skip to main content
10.1145/3313950.3313977acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Towards integration of user-centered designed tutorials for better virtual reality immersion

Published:23 February 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Virtual reality (VR) has been contributing to education, health sciences and entertainment of late. The technology has made itself flexible enough to cater to users of different ages. Additionally head-mounted displays (HMDs) has led to the increase of immersion in the VR environment. Yet, it is sometimes hard for the users to get engaged if not instructed properly to on how to interact with the environment, adding stress to what was expected to be an entertaining experience. Hands-on instructions about environment before VR exposure is common in VR commercial studios. Also, VR game developers after completing their game, put tutorial sessions for the users to understand how the game works. In this paper, we suggested that there is a need for immersive user-center designed (UCD) tutorials for the VR games, including other high interaction and engagement environments. This approach allows users to get hands-off experience and sense of achievement through well-descriptive and interactive tutorials before going into the full VR Immersion.

References

  1. Roberto Andreoli, Angela Corolla, Armando Faggiano, Delfina Malandrino, Donato Pirozzi, Mirta Ranaldi, Gianluca Santangelo, and Vittorio Scarano. Immersivity and playability evaluation of a game experience in cultural heritage. In Euro-Mediterranean Conference, pages 814--824. Springer, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Luís Miguel Alves Fernandes, Gonçalo Cruz Matos, Diogo Azevedo, Ricardo Rodrigues Nunes, Hugo Paredes, Leonel Morgado, Luís Filipe Barbosa, Paulo Martins, Benjamim Fonseca, Paulo Cristóvão, et al. Exploring educational immersive videogames: an empirical study with a 3d multimodal interaction prototype. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(11): 907--918, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Guillaume Loup, Audrey Serna, Sébastien Iksal, and Sébastien George. Immersion and persistence: improving learnersâĂŹ engagement in authentic learning situations. In European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, pages 410--415. Springer, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Leonard A Annetta, James Minogue, Shawn Y Holmes, and Meng-Tzu Cheng. Investigating the impact of video games on high school studentsâĂŹ engagement and learning about genetics. Computers & Education, 53(1):74--85, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Marc Prensky. Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1):21--21, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Johanna Bertram, Johannes Moskaliuk, and Ulrike Cress. Virtual training: Making reality work? Computers in Human Behavior, 43:284--292, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. FD Rose, Elizabeth A Attree, BM Brooks, DM Parslow, and PR Penn. Training in virtual environments: transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics, 43(4):494--511, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael Zyda. From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38(9):25--32, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Simon Davis, Keith Nesbitt, and Eugene Nalivaiko. Comparing the onset of cybersickness using the oculus rift and two virtual roller coasters. In Proceedings of the 11th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (IE 2015), volume 27, page 30, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Omar Merhi, Elise Faugloire, Moira Flanagan, and Thomas A Stoffregen. Motion sickness, console video games, and head-mounted displays. Human Factors, 49(5):920--934, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Young Youn Kim, Eun Nam Kim, Min Jae Park, Kwang Suk Park, Hee Dong Ko, and Hyun Taek Kim. The application of biosignal feedback for reducing cybersickness from exposure to a virtual environment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17(1):1--16, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Syed Fawad Mustafa Zaidi and Thomas Male. Experimenting novel virtual-reality immersion strategy to alleviate cybersickness. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, page 89. ACM, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jayfus Doswell and Kathleen Harmeyer. Extending the'serious game'boundary: Virtual instructors in mobile mixed reality learning games. In Digital Games Research Association International Conference (DiGRA 2007). Citeseer, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Fei Xia, Amir R Zamir, Zhiyang He, Alexander Sax, Jitendra Malik, and Silvio Savarese. Gibson env: Real-world perception for embodied agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 9068--9079, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Barney Dalgarno and Mark JW Lee. What are the learning affordances of 3-d virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1):10--32, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. Point & teleport locomotion technique for virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pages 205--216. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jan Gugenheimer, Evgeny Stemasov, Julian Frommel, and Enrico Rukzio. Sharevr: Enabling co-located experiences for virtual reality between hmd and non-hmd users. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 4021--4033. ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Julian Frommel, Kim Fahlbusch, Julia Brich, and Michael Weber. The effects of context-sensitive tutorials in virtual reality games. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, pages 367--375. ACM, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lily Prasuethsut. Htc vive: Everything you need to know about the steamvr headset. Retrieved January, 3:2017, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Epic Games. Unreal engine. Online: https://www.unrealengine.com, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Michael C Medlock, Dennis Wixon, Mark Terrano, Ramon Romero, and Bill Fulton. Using the rite method to improve products: A definition and a case study. Usability Professionals Association, 51, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Aaron Bangor, Philip T Kortum, and James T Miller. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6):574--594, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. Determining what individual sus scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies, 4(3):114--123, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. John Brooke et al. Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, 189(194):4--7, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Towards integration of user-centered designed tutorials for better virtual reality immersion

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICIGP '19: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
        February 2019
        151 pages
        ISBN:9781450360920
        DOI:10.1145/3313950

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 February 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader