skip to main content
10.1145/3314111.3319839acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Analyzing gaze transition behavior using bayesian mixed effects Markov models

Published:25 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The complex stochastic nature of eye tracking data calls for exploring sophisticated statistical models to ensure reliable inference in multi-trial eye-tracking experiments. We employ a Bayesian semi-parametric mixed-effects Markov model to compare gaze transition matrices between different experimental factors accommodating individual random effects. The model not only allows us to assess global influences of the external factors on the gaze transition dynamics but also provides comprehension of these effects at a deeper local level. We experimented to explore the impact of recognizing distorted images of artwork and landmarks on the gaze transition patterns. Our dataset comprises sequences representing areas of interest visited when applying a content independent grid to the resulting scan paths in a multi-trial setting. Results suggest that image recognition to some extent affects the dynamics of the transitions while image type played an essential role in the viewing behavior.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Dale J Barr. 2008. Analyzing 'visual world' eye-tracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of memory and language 59, 4 (2008), 457--474.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. J. Besag and D. Mondal. 2013. Exact Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Markov Chains: Exact Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Markov Chains. Biometrics 69, 2 (June 2013), 488--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephen R Ellis and Lawrence Stark. 1986. Statistical dependency in visual scanning. Human factors 28, 4 (1986), 421--438. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Andrew Gelman, Hal S Stern, John B Carlin, David B Dunson, Aki Vehtari, and Donald B Rubin. 2013. Bayesian data analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Joseph H Goldberg and Xerxes P Kotval. 1999. Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 24, 6 (1999), 631--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Laurent Itti, Christof Koch, and Ernst Niebur. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 20, 11 (1998), 1254--1259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jason Kottke. 2011. Mona Lisa in 140 dots. (2011). https://kottke.org/11/07/mona-lisa-in-140-dotsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Krzysztof Krejtz, Andrew Duchowski, Tomasz Szmidt, Izabela Krejtz, Fernando GonzÃąlez Perilli, Ana Pires, Anna Vilaro, and Natalia Villalobos. 2015. Gaze Transition Entropy. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 13, 1 (Dec. 2015), 4:1--4:20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Giancarlo Pastor, Inmaculada Mora-Jiménez, Riku Jäntti, and Antonio J Caamano. 2015. Mathematics of sparsity and entropy: Axioms core functions and sparse recovery. arXiv preprint arXiv.1501.05126 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mary C. Potter, Brad Wyble, Carl Erick Hagmann, and Emily S. McCourt. 2014. Detecting meaning in RSVP at 13 ms per picture. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 76, 2 (Feb. 2014), 270--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Abhra Sarkar, Jonathan Chabout, Joshua Jones Macopson, Erich D. Jarvis, and David B. Dunson. 2018. Bayesian Semiparametric Mixed Effects Markov Models With Application to Vocalization Syntax. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 0, 0 (Jan. 2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lisa Vandeberg, Samantha Bouwmeester, Bruno R. Bocanegra, and Rolf A. Zwaan. 2013. Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. Journal of Memory and Language 69, 3 (Oct. 2013), 445--460.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Analyzing gaze transition behavior using bayesian mixed effects Markov models

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        ETRA '19: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications
        June 2019
        623 pages
        ISBN:9781450367097
        DOI:10.1145/3314111

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate69of137submissions,50%

        Upcoming Conference

        ETRA '24
        The 2024 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications
        June 4 - 7, 2024
        Glasgow , United Kingdom

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader