Ariel Rosenfeld
ABSTRACT
Human space exploration creates unique challenges and opportunities for many scientific disciplines. From the human-agent interaction perspective, these require significant advances in the way that agents model, adapt and personalize their behavior to individual astronauts and groups of astronauts. In this paper, we highlight the key challenges and opportunities that human space exploration provides to the agent and UMAP communities and present two avenues for future research. We further propose a viable way to explore these challenges and opportunities through the world-wide analogue space programs which solicit research proposals from all scientific disciplines.
- Moon village: A vision for global cooperation and space 4.0. https://moonvillageassociation.org/. Accessed: 2019-03-03.Google Scholar
- NASA releases plan outlining next steps in the journey to mars. https://www.nasa.gov/topics/moon-to-mars. Accessed: 2019-03-03.Google Scholar
- Team dynamics in spaceflight analogs: Shared mental models, informal social roles, and team viability and conflict in the human exploration research analog (HERA).Google Scholar
- Kenneth J Arrow. Social choice and individual values, volume 12. Yale university press, 2012.Google Scholar
- David Benrimoh, Robert Fratila, Sonia Israel, Kelly Perlman, Nykan Mirchi, Sneha Desai, Ariel Rosenfeld, Sabrina Knappe, Jason Behrmann, Colleen Rollins, et al. Aifred health, a deep learning powered clinical decision support system for mental health. In The NIPS'17 Competition: Building Intelligent Systems, pages 251--287. Springer, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sheryl L Bishop. From earth analogues to space: learning how to boldly go. In On orbit and beyond, pages 25--50. Springer, 2013.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SL Bishop. Psychological and psychosocial health and well-being at pole station. Project Boreas: A Station for the Martian Geographic North Pole, pages 160--171, 2006.Google Scholar
- Tathagata Chakraborti, Sarath Sreedharan, Sachin Grover, and Subbarao Kambhampati. Plan explanations as model reconciliation. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pages 258--266. IEEE, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michal Chalamish and Sarit Kraus. Automed: an automated mediator for multi-issue bilateral negotiations. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 24(3):536--564, 2012.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara Grosz. What question would turing pose today? AI Magazine, 33(4):73, 2012.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott Kelly. Endurance: My Year in Space, a Lifetime of Discovery. Vintage, 2017.Google Scholar
- Akiva Kleinerman, Ariel Rosenfeld, and Sarit Kraus. Providing explanations for recommendations in reciprocal environments. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 22--30. ACM, 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth Song Lockard. Current directions in space exploration. In Human Migration to Space, pages 11--37. Springer, 2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reuth Mirsky, Yakov Kobi Gal, and Stuart M Shieber. Cradle: an online plan recognition algorithm for exploratory domains. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 8(3):45, 2017. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanjay Modgil, Francesca Toni, Floris Bex, Ivan Bratko, Carlos I Chesnevar, Wolfgang Dvovr ák, Marcelo A Falappa, Xiuyi Fan, Sarah Alice Gaggl, Alejandro J Garc'ia, et al. The added value of argumentation. In Agreement technologies, pages 357--403. Springer, 2013.Google Scholar
- Hanan Rosemarin, Ariel Rosenfeld, and Sarit Kraus. Emergency department online patient-caregiver scheduling. In AAAI. 2019.Google Scholar
- Ariel Rosenfeld, Noa Agmon, Oleg Maksimov, and Sarit Kraus. Intelligent agent supporting human--multi-robot team collaboration. Artificial Intelligence, 252:211--231, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ariel Rosenfeld, David Benrimoh, Caitrin Armstrong, Nykan Mirchi, Timothe Langlois-Therrien, Colleen Rollins, Myriam Tanguay-Sela, Joseph Mehltretter, Robert Fratila, Sonia Israel, et al. Big data analytics and ai in mental healthcare. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.12071, 2019.Google Scholar
- Ariel Rosenfeld and Sarit Kraus. Providing arguments in discussions on the basis of the prediction of human argumentative behavior. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 6(4):30, 2016. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ariel Rosenfeld and Sarit Kraus. Predicting human decision-making: From prediction to action. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 12(1):1--150, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saya Shacham. A shortened version of the profile of mood states. Journal of personality assessment, 47(3):305--306, 1983.Google Scholar
- Onn Shehory and Sarit Kraus. Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial intelligence, 101(1--2):165--200, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tammar Shrot, Avi Rosenfeld, Jennifer Golbeck, and Sarit Kraus. Crisp: an interruption management algorithm based on collaborative filtering. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 3035--3044. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter Suedfeld and G Daniel Steel. The environmental psychology of capsule habitats. Annual review of psychology, 51(1):227--253, 2000.Google Scholar
- Alan M Turing. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59(236):433--460, 1950.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Douglas A Vakoch. Psychology of space exploration: Contemporary research in historical perspective. Government Printing Office, 2011.Google Scholar
- Douglas A Weigmann and Scott A Shappell. Human factors analysis of postaccident data: Applying theoretical taxonomies of human error. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 7(1):67--81, 1997.Google ScholarCross Ref
- JA Williamson, RK Webb, A Sellen, WB Runciman, and JH Van der Walt. Human failure: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesthesia and intensive care, 21(5):678--683, 1993.Google Scholar
- Christopher Winship and Stephen L Morgan. The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual review of sociology, 25(1):659--706, 1999.Google Scholar
- John Young and Robert Crippen. Wings in Orbit: Scientific and Engineering Legacies of the Space Shuttle, 1971--2010, volume 3409. Government Printing Office, 2011.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Human-Agent Interaction for Human Space Exploration
Recommendations
Studying Human-Agent Interactions in Space Invaders
HAI '20: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent InteractionWe conducted an exploratory study to investigate human-agent interactions in the context of the Space Invaders game. In the study, the participants experienced an Uncooperative and a Cooperative agent. Although cooperation was unexpected, our results ...
The effects of cooperative agent behavior on human cooperativeness
AAMAS '09: Proceedings of The 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 2In this paper we examine the question of how cooperativeness of a software agent affects cooperativeness of a human player. Our data shows that humans behave more cooperatively towards agents that negotiate with them in a cooperative way.
Improving of Robotic Virtual Agent’s Errors Accepted by Agent’s Reaction and Human’s Preference
Social RoboticsAbstractOne way to improve the relationship between humans and anthropomorphic agents is to have humans empathize with the agents. In this study, we focused on a task between an agent and a human in which the agent makes a mistake. To investigate ...
Comments