skip to main content
10.1145/3314183.3323463acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Explaining Need-based Educational Recommendations Using Interactive Open Learner Models

Published:06 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Students might pursue different goals throughout their learning process. For example, they might be seeking new material to expand their current level of knowledge, repeating content of prior classes to prepare for an exam, or working on addressing their most recent misconceptions. Multiple potential goals require an adaptive e-learning system to recommend learning content appropriate for students' intent and to explain this recommendation in the context of this goal. In our prior work, we explored explainable recommendations for the most typical 'knowledge expansion goal". In this paper, we focus on students' immediate needs to remedy misunderstandings when they solve programming problems. We generate learning content recommendations to target the concepts with which students have struggled more recently. At the same time, we produce explanations for this recommendation goal in order to support students' understanding of why certain learning activities are recommended. The paper provides an overview of the design of this explainable educational recommender system and describes its ongoing evaluation

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Jordan Barria-Pineda and Peter Brusilovsky. 2019. Making Educational Recommendations Transparent through a Fine-Grained Open Learner Model. In Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI 2019 Workshops co-located with the 24th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM IUI 2019), Los Angeles, USA, March 20, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Roya Hosseini and Peter Brusilovsky. 2017. A Study of Concept-Based Similarity Approaches for Recommending Program Examples. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 23, 3 (2017), 161--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Roya Hosseini, Peter Brusilovsky, and Julio Guerra. 2013. Knowledge Maximizer: Concept-based Adaptive Problem Sequencing for Exam Preparation. In the 16th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013) (LNAI), Vol. 7926. 848--851.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Roya Hosseini, I-Han Hsiao, Julio Guerra, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2015. What Should I Do Next? Adaptive Sequencing in the Context of Open Social Student Modeling. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World, Gráinne Conole, Toma? Klobu?ar, Christoph Rensing, Johannes Konert, and Elise Lavoué (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 155--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O'Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2019. Personalized explanations for hybrid recommender systems. In the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '19). ACM, 379--390.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Tomasz D Loboda, Julio Guerra, Roya Hosseini, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2014. Mastery grids: An open source social educational progress visualization. In European conference on technology enhanced learning. Springer, 235--248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Nikos Manouselis, Hendrik Drachsler, Katrien Verbert, and Erik Duval. 2013. Recommender Systems for Learning. Springer, Berlin. http://www.springer.com/ us/book/9781461443605 Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonnie M Muir. 1994. Trust in automation: Part I. Theoretical issues in the study of trust and human intervention in automated systems. Ergonomics 37, 11 (1994), 1905--1922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cataldo Musto, Fedelucio Narducci, Pasquale Lops, Marco De Gemmis, and Giovanni Semeraro. 2016. ExpLOD: A Framework for Explaining Recommendations Based on the Linked Open Data Cloud. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 151--154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vanessa Putnam and Cristina Conati. 2019. Exploring the Need for Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS). In Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI 2019 Workshops co-located with the 24th ACM Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM IUI 2019), Los Angeles, USA, March 20, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Masahiro Sato, Budrul Ahsan, Koki Nagatani, Takashi Sonoda, Qian Zhang, and Tomoko Ohkuma. 2018. Explaining Recommendations Using Contexts. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 659--664. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2011. Designing and Evaluating Explanations for Recommender Systems. In Recommender Systems Handbook, Francesco Ricci, Lior Rokach, Bracha Shapira, and Paul B. Kantor (Eds.). Springer US, Boston, MA, 479--510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michael Yudelson, Peter Brusilovsky, and Vladimir Zadorozhny. 2007. A User Modeling Server for Contemporary Adaptive Hypermedia: An Evaluation of the Push Approach to Evidence Propagation. In User Modeling 2007, Cristina Conati, Kathleen McCoy, and Georgios Paliouras (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 27--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Explaining Need-based Educational Recommendations Using Interactive Open Learner Models

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UMAP'19 Adjunct: Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
        June 2019
        455 pages
        ISBN:9781450367110
        DOI:10.1145/3314183

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 6 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        UMAP'19 Adjunct Paper Acceptance Rate30of122submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

        Upcoming Conference

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader