skip to main content
10.1145/3314344.3332485acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompassConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Low-cost aerial imaging for small holder farmers

Published:03 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent work in networked systems has shown that using aerial imagery for farm monitoring can enable precision agriculture by lowering the cost and reducing the overhead of large scale sensor deployment. However, acquiring aerial imagery requires a drone, which has high capital and operational costs, often beyond the reach of farmers in the developing world. In this paper, we present TYE (Tethered eYE), an inexpensive platform for aerial imagery. It consists of a tethered helium balloon with a custom mount that can hold a smartphone (or a camera) with a battery pack. The balloon can be carried using a tether by a person or a vehicle. We incorporate various techniques to increase the operational time of the system, and to provide actionable insights even with unstable imagery. We develop path-planning algorithms and use that to develop an interactive mobile phone application that provides the user instant feedback to guide users to efficiently traverse large areas of land. We use computer vision algorithms to stitch orthomosaics by effectively countering wind-induced motion of the camera. We have used TYE for aerial imaging of agricultural land for over a year, and envision it as a low-cost aerial imaging platform for similar applications.

References

  1. 2017. Drag coefficient. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drag_coefficient. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2017. How Many Farmers Are Really Using Drones - And Who's Flying? https://dronelife.com/2017/04/17/many-farmers-really-using-drones-whos-flying/. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2017. Understanding and Evaluating Satellite Remote Sensing Technology in Agriculture. (2017). http://www.geosys.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Whitepaper_SatelliteRemoteSensingTechnology_L.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2018. Beaufort Scale. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beaufort_scale. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. James S Aber. 2004. Lighter-than-air platforms for small-format aerial photography. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 107, 1 (2004), 39--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. James S Aber, Susan W Aber, and Firooza Pavri. 2002. Unmanned small format aerial photography from kites acquiring large-scale, high-resolution, multiview-angle imagery. International Archives of Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 34, 1 (2002), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Herbert Bay, Tinne Tuytelaars, and Luc Van Gool. 2006. Surf: Speeded up robust features. Computer vision-ECCV 2006 (2006), 404--417. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Gary Bradski. 2000. The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb's Journal: Software Tools for the Professional Programmer 25, 11 (2000), 120--123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. DJI. 2018. DJI Battery Specifications. (2018). http://store.dji.com/product/phantom-3-intelligent-flight-battery.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. DJI. 2018. DJI Phantom Series. (2018). http://store.dji.com/shop/phantom-series.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Pedro F Felzenszwalb and Ramin Zabih. 2011. Dynamic programming and graph algorithms in computer vision. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 4 (2011), 721--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Martin A Fischler and Robert C Bolles. 1987. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. In Readings in computer vision. Elsevier, 726--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Patricia K. Freeman and Robert S. Freeland. 2015. Agricultural UAVs in the U.S.: potential, policy, and hype. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. M. Gevaert, J. Suomalainen, J. Tang, and L. Kooistra. 2015. Generation of Spectral-Temporal Response Surfaces by Combining Multispectral Satellite and Hyperspectral UAV Imagery for Precision Agriculture Applications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Matthias Grundmann, Vivek Kwatra, Daniel Castro, and Irfan Essa. 2012. Calibration-free rolling shutter removal. In Computational Photography (ICCP), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mitchell C. Hunter, Richard G. Smith, Meagan E. Schipanski, Lesley W. Atwood, and David A. Mortensen. 2017. Agriculture in 2050: Recalibrating Targets for Sustainable Intensification. BioScience 67, 4 (2017), 386--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. WHITTLES. JH. 1970. Tethered balloon for archaeological photos. Photogrammetric Engineering 36, 2 (1970), 181.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. AI Kasner and EA Meinecke. 1996. Porosity in rubber, a review. Rubber chemistry and technology 69, 3 (1996), 424--443.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chia-Kai Liang, Li-Wen Chang, and Homer H Chen. 2008. Analysis and compensation of rolling shutter effect. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 17, 8 (2008), 1323--1330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Tiecheng Liu and John R. Kender. 2007. Computational Approaches to Temporal Sampling of Video Sequences. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 3, 2, Article 7 (May 2007). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. I Pinnau, JG Wijmans, I Blume, T Kuroda, and KV Peinemann. 1988. Gas permeation through composite membranes. Journal of membrane science 37, 1 (1988), 81--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. DG Pitt and GR Glover. 1993. Large-scale 35-mm aerial photographs for assessment of vegetation-management research plots in eastern Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23, 10 (1993), 2159--2169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. JACOB POUSHTER. 2016. Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies. (2016). http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/02/22/smartphone-ownership-and-internet-usage-continues-to-climb-in-emerging-economies/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sylvain Ratabouil. 2015. Android NDK: beginner's guide. Packt Publishing Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Catur Aries Rokhmana. 2015. The Potential of UAV-based Remote Sensing for Supporting Precision Agriculture in Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences 24 (2015). The 1st International Symposium on LAPAN-IPB Satellite (LISAT) for Food Security and Environmental Monitoring.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeff Sharkey. 2009. Coding for Life: Battery Life, That is. (2009). https://dl.google.com/io/2009/pres/W_0300_CodingforLife-BatteryLifeThatIs.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Mike J. Smith, Jim Chandler, and James Rose. 2009. High spatial resolution data acquisition for the geosciences: kite aerial photography. Earth Surface Processes and landforms 34, 1 (2009), 155--161.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. E. Tola, V. Lepetit, and P. Fua. 2010. DAISY: An Efficient Dense Descriptor Applied to Wide Baseline Stereo. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32, 5 (May 2010), 815--830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. E. Tola, V. Lepetit, and P. Fua. 2008. A Fast Local Descriptor for Dense Matching. In Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Alaska, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Philip HS Torr and Andrew Zisserman. 2000. MLESAC: A new robust estimator with application to estimating image geometry. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 78, 1 (2000), 138--156. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. P. Tripicchio, M. Satler, G. Dabisias, E. Ruffaldi, and C. A. Avizzano. 2015. Towards Smart Farming and Sustainable Agriculture with Drones. In International Conference on Intelligent Environments. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Deepak Vasisht, Zerina Kapetanovic, Jongho Won, Xinxin Jin, Ranveer Chandra, Sudipta Sinha, Ashish Kapoor, Madhusudhan Gumbalapura Sudarshan, and Sean Stratman. 2017. FarmBeats: An IoT Platform for Data-Driven Agriculture. In 14th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 17). USENIX Association, Boston, MA. https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi17/technical-sessions/presentation/vasisht Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Low-cost aerial imaging for small holder farmers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      COMPASS '19: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies
      July 2019
      290 pages
      ISBN:9781450367141
      DOI:10.1145/3314344

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 July 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      COMPASS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%Overall Acceptance Rate25of50submissions,50%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader