skip to main content
10.1145/3316782.3321529acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Acceptance and sustainability of health promotion solutions for the elderly in Taiwan: evidence from SHI-LIN elderly university in Taipei

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Faced with the obvious changes in the demographic structure, governments in all countries are actively developing long-term social welfare policies in response to the impact of the ageing population. Aging issues in Taiwan is becoming serious, as Taiwan already entered into an aging society in 2018 and become one of the fast aging country in the world. In this research, following the first phase research for identifying three senior participants' group namely as "Active Health," "Confident Health" and "Carefree Health" with different lifestyles, through workshop with semi-structured questionnaire, we analyze the acceptance and sustainability of three health promotion solutions, namely, S1 (10-minute exercise), S2 (smart bracelet) and S3 (health chatbot).

This research found that the elderly in Group A tends to use solution 3 (health chatbot) with high acceptance and sustainability with the triggers by "professionalism" & "self-demanding." And Group B tends to take the solution 1 (10-minute exercise) with high acceptance and sustainability triggered by "affect" & "interpersonal influences." C Group's opinions are more widely distributed. Based on our findings from experiment on three health promotion solutions, we will continue to make the next stage research on scale testing to validate the acceptance, sustainability and triggers for better understanding the health promotion behaviors for elderly in Taiwan.

References

  1. Chernoff, R. 2001. Nutrition and health promotion in older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56(2),47--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Fogg, BJ. 2003. Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Keller, G and Flery, J. 2000. Health promotion for the elderly. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ministry of the Interior. 2018. Population Estimation. Retrieved from:https://www.moi.gov.tw/chi/chi_news/news_detail.aspx?type_code=02&sn=13723Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. World Health Organization. 1986. WHO definition of health. Retrieved from: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/print.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. National Development Council. 2018. Population Estimation. Retrieved from: https://www.ndc.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=114AAE178CD95D4C&sms=DF717169EA26F1A3&s=E1EC042108072B67Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. National Health Institute. 2013. National Health Interview Survey. Retrieved from: http://www.mohw.gov.tw/news/455845157Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Michelle Lin, Hsiu-An Tsui, Hao-Che Huan and Sung, Tung-Jung. 2018. Designing a Health Promotion Program for the Elderly: Evidence from Shihlin Evergreen University in Taipei, DMI's 21th Academic Design Management Conference, London, UK, August, 1--2, pp. 1339--1349.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization. 1986. The Ottawa charter for health promotion. Retrieved from:http://www.who.int/healthpromotion/conferences/previous/ottawa/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Walker, S. N., Sechrist, K. R., & Pender, N. J. 1987. The health-promoting lifestyle profile: development and psychometric characteristics. Nursing Research, 36(2), 76--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gold, R. S., & Miner, K. R. 2002. Report of the 2000 joint committee on health education and promotion terminology. Journal of School Health, 72(1), 3--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. World Health Organization. 2002. WHO: Active Aging: a policy framework. Retrieved from : https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/active_ageing/en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. OECD. 2009. Health Working Papers. Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DELSA/HEA/WD/HWP%282009%291&docLanguage=EnGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ochieng, B. 2006. Factors affecting choice of a healthy lifestyle: implications for nurses. British Journal of Community Nursing, 11(2), 76--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Pender,. N.J. 1995. Health promotion model- instruments to measure health promoting lifestyle: Health- promoting lifestyle profile {HPLP II} (Adult Version). Retrieved from: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/85349/3/HPLP_II-English_Version.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Pender, N. J. 1996. Health Promotion Model Manual. Retrieved from: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/85350/HEALTH_PROMOTION_MANUAL_Rev_5-2011.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Fogg BJ. 2009. A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design. Stanford University. Retrieved from: https://www.mebook.se/images/page_file/38/Fogg%20Behavior%20Model.pdf. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 5% Design Action. 2018. Retrieved from http://5percent-design-action.com/index_en.php.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Acceptance and sustainability of health promotion solutions for the elderly in Taiwan: evidence from SHI-LIN elderly university in Taipei

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      PETRA '19: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
      June 2019
      655 pages
      ISBN:9781450362320
      DOI:10.1145/3316782

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader