skip to main content
10.1145/3316782.3322778acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

User centered design in practice: adapting HRI to real user needs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Here we present the methodological principles and technologies, which compose the backbone of designing the i-Walk platform Human Robot Interaction (HRI) environment. The reported work builds upon experience gained from previous engagement with development of the multimodal HRI communication model of the MOBOT assistive robotic rollator and its end-user evaluation, leading to our enhanced methodology for identifying and prioritizing user needs as applied in our current HRI design approach. Emphasis is placed on adopting multimodal communication patterns from actual human-human interaction in the context of mobility rehabilitation, which may enrich human-robot communication by increasing the naturalness in interaction from the side of the robotic device by adding more "human" characteristics both in respect to understanding and reaction capabilities of the robot.

References

  1. M. Hirvensalo, T. Rantanen, and M. Heikkinen, "Mobility difficulties and physical activity as predictors of mortality and loss of independence in the community-living older population," Journal of the American Geriatric Society, vol. 48, pp. 493--498, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. O.J. Chuy, Y. Hirata, Z. Wang, and K. Kosuge, "Approach in assisting a sit-to-stand movement using robotic walking support system," IEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, China, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Chugo, T. Asawa, T. Kitamura, S. Jia, and K. Takase, "A rehabilitation walker with standing and walking assistance," IEE/RSJ Int'l Conf. on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Wakita, J. Huang, P. Di, K. Sekiyama, and T. Fukuda, "Human walking-intention-based motion control of an omnidirectional-type cane robot," In IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics, vol. 18, no. 1, February 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Y. Hirata, S. Komatsuda, and K. Kosuge, "Fall prevention control of passive intelligent walker based on human model," IEE/RSJ Int'l Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Nice, France, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Papageorgiou, X., Tzafestas, C., Maragos, P., Pavlakos, G., Chalvatzaki, G., Moustris, G., Kokkinos, I., Peer, A., Stanczyk, B., Fotinea, S-E. and Efthimiou, E. 2014. Advances in Intelligent Mobility Assistance Robot-integrating Multimodal Sensory Processing. Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Aging and Assistive Environments, Stephanidis C., and Antona, M. (Eds.): UAHCI/HCII 2014, Part III, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: 8515 (ISBN: 978-3-319-07445-0 (Print) 978-3-319-07446-7 (Online)), pp. 694--705, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 692--703 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. S-E. Fotinea, et al., "The MOBOT Human-Robot Communication Model", in Proc. of 6th IEEE CogInfoCom 2015 Conference, 19-21 October 2015, Győr, Hungary, pp. 201 -- 206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. MOBOT Deliverable D5.4: Report on performance metrics and final evaluation study: http://www.mobot-project.eu/userfiles/downloads/Deliverables/MOBOT_WP5_D5.4.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Efthimiou, S-E. Fotinea, T. Goulas, M. Koutsombogera, P. Karioris, A. Vacalopoulou, I. Rodomagoulakis, P. Maragos, C. Tzafestas, V. Pitsikalis, Y. Koumpouros, A. Karavasili, P. Siavelis, F. Koureta, D. Alexopoulou. "The MOBOT Rollator Human-Robot Interaction Model and User Evaluation Process", in Proc. of the IEEE SSCI 2016 Conference, 6-9 December, 2016, Athens, Greece.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Y. Koumpouros, "A systematic review on existing measures for the subjective assessment of rehabilitation and assistive robot devices," Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2016, Article ID 1048964, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S-E. Fotinea, E. Efthimiou, T. Goulas, A-L. Dimou, C. Tzafestas, V. Pitsikalis. "The MOBOT Human-Robot Interaction - Showcasing Assistive HRI", Proc. of PCI 2016, ACM conference, 10-12 November, 2016; Patras, Greece. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Koumpouros, Y., Papageorgiou, E. Karavasili, A, and Koureta. F. 2016. PYTHEIA: A Scale for Assessing Rehabilitation and Assistive Robotics. ICPMRSM 2016: 18th International Conference on Physical Medicine, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, November 3-4, Cape Town, South Africa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. A. Kötteritzsch, and B. Weyers, "Assistive technologies for older adults in urban areas: a literature review," Cognitive Computation, vol. 8.2, pp. 299--317, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. E. Stuck and W. A. Rogers. Understanding Older Adult's Perceptions of Factors that Support Trust in Human and Robot Care Providers. In PETRA '17 Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Pages: 372-377. Island of Rhodes, Greece --- June 21 - 23, 2017. ACM New York, NY, USA ©2017, ISBN: 978-1-4503-5227-7, doi> Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User centered design in practice: adapting HRI to real user needs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PETRA '19: Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
        June 2019
        655 pages
        ISBN:9781450362320
        DOI:10.1145/3316782

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader