skip to main content
research-article

Congestion-Aware Ride-Sharing

Published:12 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In its current form, ride-sharing is responsible for a small fraction of traffic load compared to other transportation modes, especially private vehicles. As its benefits became more evident, and obstacles, e.g., lack of liability legislation, that may hinder its larger scale adoption are being overcome, ride-sharing will be a more common mode of transportation. In particular, autonomous vehicles (AVs) are showing their proficiency on the roads, which may also catalyze ride-sharing ubiquity. For example, while an AV owner is at work, he may find it appealing to offer his AV as a service or rent it to Uber so that the vehicle serves others’ transportation requests. Furthermore, this disruptive technology is backed up by companies like Google (Waymo), Tesla, and Uber. Therefore, ride-sharing will soon become a source of traffic congestion itself. In this article, we present an efficient congestion-aware ride-sharing algorithm which, instead of finding optimal travel plans based on traffic load generated by other means of transportation, it computes optimal travel plans for thousands of ride-sharing requests within a time interval. Note that in this problem, an optimal travel plan for a group of requests may affect an already computed travel plan for another concurrent group of requests, therefore plans cannot be isolated from each other.

References

  1. James Arbib and Tony Seba. 2017. Rethinking transportation 2020-2030. RethinkX, May (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Roberto Baldacci, Vittorio Maniezzo, and Aristide Mingozzi. 2004. An exact method for the car pooling problem based on Lagrangean column generation. Operations Research 52, 3 (2004), 422--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andreas Baltz and Anand Srivastav. 2004. Fast approximation of minimum multicast congestion—Implementation VERSUS theory. RAIRO - Operations Research 38, 4 (2004), 319--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Oscar Correa, Kotagiri Ramamohanarao, Egemen Tanin, and Lars Kulik. 2018. From ride-sourcing to ride-sharing through hot-spots. In Proceedings of the 14th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. ACM, New York, NY, 136--145. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. E. Dreyfus and R. A. Wagner. 1971. The Steiner problem in graphs. Networks 1, 3 (1971), 195--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Daniel J. Fagnant and Kara M. Kockelman. 2016. Dynamic ride-sharing and fleet sizing for a system of shared autonomous vehicles in Austin, Texas. Transportation (2016), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yan Huang, Favyen Bastani, Ruoming Jin, and Xiaoyang Sean Wang. 2014. Large scale real-time ridesharing with service guarantee on road networks. VLDB 7, 14 (2014), 2017--2028. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. K. Jansen and H. Zhang. 2002. An approximation algorithm for the multicast congestion problem via minimum Steiner trees. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Approximation and Randomized Algorithms in Communication Networks. 77--90.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Klaus Jansen and Hu Zhang. 2008. Approximation algorithms for general packing problems and their application to the multicast congestion problem. Mathematical Programming 114, 1 (2008), 183--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. K. M. Mustafizur Rahman Khan. 2016. Location Based Services for Groups. Ph.D. Dissertation. Melbourne School of Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. K. M. Mustafizur Rahman Khan, Oscar Correa, Egemen Tanin, Lars Kulik, and Kotagiri Ramamohanarao. 2017. Ride-sharing is about agreeing on a destination. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS’17). 6:1--6:10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shuo Ma, Yu Zheng, and Ouri Wolfson. 2013. T-share: A large-scale dynamic taxi ridesharing service. In ICDE. 410--421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shuo Ma, Yu Zheng, and Ouri Wolfson. 2015. Real-time city-scale taxi ridesharing. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 27, 7 (2015), 1782--1795.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Traffic Assignment Manual. 1964. Bureau of public roads. U.S. Department of Commerce.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniel Mölle, Stefan Richter, and Peter Rossmanith. 2006. A faster algorithm for the Steiner tree problem. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 561--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Martin Olsen. 2013. On the complexity of computing optimal private park-and-ride plans. In Computational Logistics. 73--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Michael Patriksson. 2015. The Traffic Assignment Problem: Models and Methods. Courier Dover Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. D. Van Vliet. 1973. Road assignment: A case for incremental loading. In GLTS Note 30. Department of Planning and Transportation, Greater London Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Santosh Vempala and Berthold Vöcking. 1999. Approximating multicast congestion. In International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation. Springer, 367--372. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yaoli Wang, Ronny J. Kutadinata, and Stephan Winter. 2016. Activity-based ridesharing: Increasing flexibility by time geography. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (GIS’16). 1:1--1:10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Congestion-Aware Ride-Sharing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems
      ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems  Volume 5, Issue 1
      Special Issue on SIGSPATIAL 2017
      March 2019
      146 pages
      ISSN:2374-0353
      EISSN:2374-0361
      DOI:10.1145/3336122
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 June 2019
      • Accepted: 1 January 2019
      • Revised: 1 October 2018
      • Received: 1 July 2018
      Published in tsas Volume 5, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format