skip to main content
10.1145/3318216.3363321acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Deep learning-based C/U plane separation architecture for automotive edge computing

Published:07 November 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the next-generation intelligent transportation system, not only conventional static information like geographic location but also various dynamic information such as vehicle mobility, traffic signals and also in-vehicle IoT sensor data needs to be collected and transferred. In this paper, we propose a deep-learning based control plane and user plane separation (CUPS) automotive edge computing architecture to offload localized mapping information to edge server to reduce the transmitted traffic volume to central server and also the response latency of automotive applications. For each automotive application, we can deploy an Evolved Packet Core (EPC) user plane on-demand. We apply deep learning to classify packets of different automotive applications to different Radio Access Networks (RAN) slices for application-specific spectrum scheduling and also route packets to different application-specific edge servers via corresponding EPC user planes.

References

  1. 2017. Interface between the Control Plane and the User Plane of EPC Nodes. https://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/29244.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Cisco. 2011. A Business Case for Connecting Vehicles, https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/about/ac79/docs/mfg/Connected-Vehicles_Exec_Summary.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Ping Du and Akihiro Nakao. 2018. Deep Learning-based Application Specific RAN Slicing for Mobile Networks. In IEEE International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GSMA. 2012. 2025 Every Car Connected, https://www.gsma.com/iot/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/gsma2025everycarconnected.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. E. Kohler. 2000. The Click modular router. Ph.D. Dissertation. MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dirk Merkel. 2014. Docker: lightweight linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux Journal 2014, 239 (2014), 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Akihiro Nakao. 2012. FLARE: Open Deeply Programmable Network Node Architecture. http://netseminar.stanford.edu/seminars/10_18_12.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Akihiro Nakao and Ping Du et. al. 2017. End-to-End Network Slicing for 5G Mobile Networks. IPSJ Journal of Information Processing (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Navid Nikaein, Mahesh K Marina, Saravana Manickam, Alex Dawson, Raymond Knopp, and Christian Bonnet. 2014. OpenAirInterface: A flexible platform for 5G research. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 44, 5 (2014), 33--38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. OpenStreetMap. 2007. OpenStreetMap. https://www.openstreetmap.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. PWC. 2016. Connected car report 2016. https://www.pwc.nl/en/publicaties/connected-car-report-2016.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. SBD. 2015. Connected Car Global Forecast 2015. https://www.sbdautomotive.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Deep learning-based C/U plane separation architecture for automotive edge computing

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SEC '19: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing
      November 2019
      455 pages
      ISBN:9781450367332
      DOI:10.1145/3318216

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 November 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      SEC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate20of59submissions,34%Overall Acceptance Rate40of100submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader