skip to main content
10.1145/3318464.3384699acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

STAR: A Distributed Stream Warehouse System for Spatial Data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:31 May 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of mobile phones and location-based services gives rise to an explosive growth of spatial data. This spatial data contains valuable information, and calls for data stream warehouse systems that can provide real-time analytical results with the latest integrated spatial data. In this demonstration, we present the STAR (Spatial Data Stream Warehouse) system. STAR is a distributed in-memory spatial data stream warehouse system that provides low-latency and up-to-date analytical results over a fast spatial data stream. STAR supports a rich set of aggregate queries for spatial data analytics, e.g., contrasting the frequencies of spatial objects that appear in different spatial regions, or showing the most frequently mentioned topics being tweeted in different cities. STAR processes aggregate queries by maintaining distributed materialized views. Additionally, STAR supports dynamic load adjustment that makes STAR scalable and adaptive. We demonstrate STAR on top of Amazon EC2 clusters using real data sets.

References

  1. Michael Carey, Steven Jacobs, and Vassilis Tsotras. 2016. Breaking BAD: a data serving vision for big active data. In DEBS. 181--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zhida Chen, Gao Cong, Zhenjie Zhang, Tom ZJ Fuz, and Lisi Chen. 2017. Distributed publish/subscribe query processing on the spatio-textual data stream. In ICDE. IEEE, 1095--1106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tyson Condie, Neil Conway, Peter Alvaro, Joseph M Hellerstein, Khaled Elmeleegy, and Russell Sears. 2010. MapReduce online. In NSDI, Vol. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lukasz Golab, Theodore Johnson, J Spencer Seidel, and Vladislav Shkapenyuk. 2009. Stream warehousing with DataDepot. In SIGMOD. ACM, 847--854.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmed R Mahmood, Anas Daghistani, Ahmed M Aly, Mingjie Tang, Saleh Basalamah, Sunil Prabhakar, and Walid G Aref. 2018. Adaptive processing of spatial-keyword data over a distributed streaming cluster. In SIGSPATIAL. ACM, 219--228.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Varun Pandey, Andreas Kipf, Thomas Neumann, and Alfons Kemper. 2018. How Good Are Modern Spatial Analytics Systems? PVLDB, Vol. 11, 11 (2018), 1661--1673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. STAR: A Distributed Stream Warehouse System for Spatial Data

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGMOD '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data
          June 2020
          2925 pages
          ISBN:9781450367356
          DOI:10.1145/3318464

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 31 May 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate785of4,003submissions,20%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader