skip to main content
10.1145/332040.332407acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Helper agent: designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2000Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces a new application area for agents in the computer interface: the support of human-human interaction. We discuss an interface agent prototype that is designed to support human-human communication in virtual environments. The prototype interacts with users strategically during conversation, spending most of its time listening. The prototype mimics a party host, trying to find a safe common topic for guests whose conversation has lagged. We performed an experimental evaluation of the prototype's ability to assist in cross-cultural conversations. We designed the prototype to introduce safe or unsafe topics to conversation pairs, through a series of questions and suggestions. The agent made positive contributions to participants' experience of the conversation, influenced their perception of each other and of each others' national group, and even seemed to effect their style of behavior. We discuss the implications of our research for the design of social agents to support human-human interaction.

References

  1. 1.Cassell, J., Bickmore, T., Billinghurst, M., Campbell, L., Chang, K., Vilhjalmsson, H., and Yan, H., Embodiment in Conversational Interfaces: Rea, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI-99), pp.520-527, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Clark, H.H., Using Language, Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Foner, L., Entertaining Agents: A Sociological Case Study, in Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Marina del Rey, CA, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.Hall, E.T., The Hidden Dimension, Anchor Books/Doubleday, 1982 (1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Hall, E.T., and Hall, M.R., Hidden Differences: Doing Business with the Japanese, Anchor Books, 1990 reprint.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Isbister, K., and Doyle, P. Touring Machines: Guide Agents for Sharing Stories about Digital Places, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Narrative and Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Fall Symposium Series, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Isbister, K., and Hayes-Roth, B. Social Implicatibns of Using Synthetic Characters, in Animated Interface Agents: Making Them Intelligent (a workshop in IJCAI- 97, Nagoya, JAPAN, August 1997), 19-20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Lester, J.C., Barlow, S.T., Converse, S.A., Stone, B.A., Kahler, S.E., and Bhogal, R.S. The Persona Effect: Affective impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents. Proceedings of CHI '97 (Atlanta GA, March 1997), ACM Press, 359-366. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.McCloud, S., Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art, Harper Perennial, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Nakanishi, H., Yoshida, C., Nishimura, T., and ishida, T., FreeWalk: A 3D Virtual Space for Casual Meetings, IEEE MultiMedia, 6(2), pp.20-28, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11.Parise, S., Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., and Waters, K. My Partner is a Real Dog: Cooperation with Social Agents, in Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work '96 (Cambridge, MA), ACM Press, 399-408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Reeves, B., and Nass, C., The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, andNew Media Like Real People and Places, Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.Sugawara, S., Suzuki, G., Nagashima, Y., Matsuura, M., Tanigawa, H., and Moriuchi, M., InterSpace: Networked Virtual World for Visual Communication, IEICE (The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers) Transactions on Information and Systems, E77-D(12), pp.1344-1349, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Waters, R.C., and Barrus, J.W., The Rise of Shared Virtual Environments, IEEE Spectrum, 34(3), pp.20-25, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Helper agent: designing an assistant for human-human interaction in a virtual meeting space

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                CHI '00: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                April 2000
                587 pages
                ISBN:1581132166
                DOI:10.1145/332040

                Copyright © 2000 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 April 2000

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                CHI '00 Paper Acceptance Rate72of336submissions,21%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader