skip to main content
10.1145/3322276.3322321acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

DynaKnob: Combining Haptic Force Feedback and Shape Change

Published: 18 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Despite the advantages of tangible interaction, physical controls like knobs seem to be disappearing from a wide range of products in our everyday life. The work presented in this paper explores how physical controls can become dynamic, in terms of both shape, and haptic force feedback. The paper contains two strands of work: First, we present a study that explores the relationship between haptic force feedback and different knob shapes, evaluating twelve distinct haptic stimuli in relation to six widely used knob shapes. Second, based on the insights collected in the study, we present the design of DynaKnob, a shape changing knob that can change between four different knob shapes. DynaKnob illustrates how dynamic content control, can be combined with dynamic shape and force feedback. Both the study and the design of DynaKnob contribute to understanding how adaptive physical interface controls could be designed in the future.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (disfp1254.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Jason Alexander, Anne Roudaut, Jürgen Steimle, Kasper Hornbæk, Miguel Bruns Alonso, Sean Follmer, and Timothy Merritt. 2018. Grand Challenges in Shape-Changing Interface Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 299, 14 pages.
[2]
Apple Watch. Retrieved on 16.04.2019 from https://www.apple.com/lae/watch/
[3]
Konrad Baumann, and Bruce Thomas. 2002. User Interface Design of Electronic Appliances. CRC Press. 2001 Apr 5.
[4]
BMW iDrive. Retrieved on 16.04.2019 from https://www.bmw.com/en/innovation/meteorite-styled-car.html
[5]
Harold P. van Cott, and Robert G. Kinkade. 1972. Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design.
[6]
Corentin Coulais, Eial Teomy, Koen de Reus, Yair Shokef, and Martin van Hecke (2016). Combinatorial Design of Textured Mechanical Metamaterials. Nature, 535(7613), 529.
[7]
Tom Djajadiningrat, Ben Matthews, and Marcelle Stienstra. 2007. Easy Doesn't Do It: Skill and Expression in Tangible Aesthetics. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 11, 8 (December 2007), 657--676.
[8]
George W. Fitzmaurice and William Buxton. 1997. An Empirical Evaluation of Graspable User Interfaces: towards Specialized, Space-multiplexed Input. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '97). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 43--50.
[9]
William W. Gaver. 1991. "Technology Affordances." In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (CHI '91), ACM, 79--84.
[10]
Lars-Erik Janlert. 2014. The ubiquitous button. Interactions, 21(3), 26--33.
[11]
Jerome H. Ely, Robert M. Thomson, and Jesse Orlansky. 1956. Design of controls. Dunlap And Associates East Inc Norwalk Ct.
[12]
Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: Dynamic Physical Affordances and Constraints through Shape and Object Actuation. In Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (UIST '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 417--426.
[13]
Chris Harrison and Scott E. Hudson. 2009. Providing Dynamically Changeable Physical Buttons on a Visual display. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 299--308.
[14]
Immersion Haptic Effects Library (2004)
[15]
Alexandra Ion, Robert Kovacs, Oliver S. Schneider, Pedro Lopes, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Metamaterial Textures. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 336, 12 pages.
[16]
Sergi Jordà, Günter Geiger, Marcos Alonso, and Martin Kaltenbrunner. 2007. The ReacTable: Exploring the Synergy between Live Music Performance and Tabletop Tangible Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (TEI '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 139--146.
[17]
Hyunyoung Kim, Céline Coutrix, and Anne Roudaut. 2018. KnobSlider: Design of a Shape-Changing UI for Parameter Control. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 339, 13 pages.
[18]
Laehyun Kim, Wanjoo Park, Hyunchul Cho and Sehyung Park, "An Universal Remote Controller with Haptic Interface for Home Devices," In 2010 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp. 209--210, IEEE, 2010.
[19]
William B. Knowles, and Thomas B. Sheridan. 1966. The "Feel" of Rotary Controls: Friction and Inertia. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 8(3), 209--215.
[20]
Manuel Kühner, Jörg Wild, Heiner Bubb, Klaus Bengler, and Johann Schneider. Haptic Perception of Viscous Friction of Rotary Switches. 2011. IEEE World Haptics Conference, Istanbul, 2011, pp. 587--591.
[21]
Karon E. MacLean, Scott S. Snibbe, and Golan Levin. 2000. Tagged Handles: Merging Discrete and Continuous Manual Control. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 225--232.
[22]
Microsoft Surface Dial. A New Tool for the Creative Process. Retrieved on 21.09.2018 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/surface/accessories/surface-dial
[23]
Georg Michelitsch, Jason Williams, Martin Osen, Beatriz Jimenez, and Stefan Rapp. 2004. Haptic Chameleon: a New Concept of Shape-changing User Interface Controls with Force Feedback. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1305--1308.
[24]
Nest Thermostat. Retrieved on 18.01.2019 from https://nest.com/thermostats/
[25]
Alexander Ng, Stephen A. Brewster, Frank Beruscha, and Wolfgang Krautter. 2017. An Evaluation of Input Controls for In-Car Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2845--2852.
[26]
Anke van Oosterhout, Miguel Bruns Alonso, and Satu Jumisko-Pyykkö. 2018. Ripple Thermostat: Affecting the Emotional Experience through Interactive Force Feedback and Shape Change. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Paper 655, 12 pages.
[27]
Anke van Oosterhout, Majken Kirkegård Rasmussen, Eve Hoggan, and Miguel Bruns. 2018. Knobology 2.0: Giving Shape to the Haptic Force Feedback of Interactive Knobs. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct Proceedings (UIST '18 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 197--199.
[28]
Sylvain Pauchet, Catherine Letondal, Jean-Luc Vinot, Mickaël Causse, Mathieu Cousy, Valentin Becquet, and Guillaume Crouzet. 2018. GazeForm: Dynamic Gaze-adaptive Touch Surface for Eyes-free Interaction in Airliner Cockpits. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1193--1205.
[29]
Laura Peebles, and Beverley Norris. 2003. Filling 'Gaps' in Strength Data for Design. Applied Ergonomics, 34(1), 73--88.
[30]
Ahmad Rafsanjani, Abdolhamid Akbarzadeh, and Damiano Pasini. 2015. Snapping Mechanical Metamaterials under Tension. Advanced Materials 27.39 (2015): 5931--5935.
[31]
Majken K. Rasmussen, Esben W. Pedersen, Marianne G. Petersen, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2012. Shape-changing Interfaces: a Review of the Design Space and Open Research Questions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 735--744.
[32]
Simon Robinson, Céline Coutrix, Jennifer Pearson, Juan Rosso, Matheus Fernandes Torquato, Laurence Nigay, and Matt Jones. 2016. Emergeables: Deformable Displays for Continuous Eyes-Free Mobile Interaction. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3793--3805.
[33]
Sharp, E. 1962. Maximum Torque Sxertable on Knobs of Various Sizes and Rim Surfaces. MDL-TDR-62--17, Behavioral Sciences Laboratory, Aerospace Medical Division, WrightPatterson AFB, Ohio.
[34]
Jihoon Suh, Wooshik Kim, and Andrea Bianchi. 2017. Button+: Supporting User and Context Aware Interaction through Shape-Changing Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 261--268.
[35]
Colin Swindells, Karon E. MacLean, and Kellogg S. Booth. 2009. Designing for Feel: Contrasts between Human and Automated Parametric Capture of Knob Physics. IEEE transactions on haptics 2.4 (2009): 200--211.
[36]
Yue Hang Tan, Poh Kiat Ng, Adi Saptari & Kian Siong Jee. 2014. Ergonomics Aspects of Knob Designs: a Literature Review. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 16:1, 86--98.
[37]
John Tiab and Kasper Hornbæk. 2016. Understanding Affordance, System State, and Feedback in Shape-Changing Buttons. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2752--2763.
[38]
Simon Voelker, Kjell Ivar Øvergård, Chat Wacharamanotham, and Jan Borchers. 2015. Knobology Revisited: A Comparison of User Performance between Tangible and Virtual Rotary Knobs. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Interactive Tabletops & Surfaces (ITS '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 35--38.
[39]
Malte Weiss, Julie Wagner, Yvonne Jansen, Roger Jennings, Ramsin Khoshabeh, James D. Hollan, and Jan Borchers. 2009. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 481--490.
[40]
Wesley E. Woodson, and Donald W. Conover. 1964. Human engineering guide for equipment designers. Univ of California Press, 1964.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing the Impact of Force Feedback in Musical Knobs on Performance and User ExperienceActuators10.3390/act1311046213:11(462)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2024
  • (2024)3D-Printed Cells for Creating Variable SoftnessProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3635249(1-7)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Enhanced Tiny Haptic Dial With T-Shaped Shaft Based on Magnetorheological FluidIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10.1109/LRA.2024.34818309:12(10835-10841)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference
June 2019
1628 pages
ISBN:9781450358507
DOI:10.1145/3322276
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. affordance
  2. haptic force feedback
  3. mechanical metamaterials
  4. shape-changing interfaces

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

DIS '19
Sponsor:
DIS '19: Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019
June 23 - 28, 2019
CA, San Diego, USA

Acceptance Rates

DIS '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 105 of 415 submissions, 25%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%

Upcoming Conference

DIS '25
Designing Interactive Systems Conference
July 5 - 9, 2025
Funchal , Portugal

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)87
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Assessing the Impact of Force Feedback in Musical Knobs on Performance and User ExperienceActuators10.3390/act1311046213:11(462)Online publication date: 16-Nov-2024
  • (2024)3D-Printed Cells for Creating Variable SoftnessProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3635249(1-7)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Enhanced Tiny Haptic Dial With T-Shaped Shaft Based on Magnetorheological FluidIEEE Robotics and Automation Letters10.1109/LRA.2024.34818309:12(10835-10841)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • (2023)Extending the Interaction Space of Rotary Knobs by Multi-touch-based Grasp RecognitionProceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia10.1145/3626705.3627797(198-209)Online publication date: 3-Dec-2023
  • (2022)Adjustable Graphical Notation and Accessible Hardware to Accommodate the Force Feedback Design ProcessAdjunct Proceedings of the 2022 Nordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3547522.3547683(1-5)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)MoLux: Negotiating Control with a Shape-Changing Lamp at HomeNordic Human-Computer Interaction Conference10.1145/3546155.3547271(1-13)Online publication date: 8-Oct-2022
  • (2022)FlexHaptics: A Design Method for Passive Haptic Inputs Using Planar Compliant StructuresProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3502113(1-13)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)Shape-Haptics: Planar & Passive Force Feedback Mechanisms for Physical InterfacesProceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3491102.3501829(1-15)Online publication date: 29-Apr-2022
  • (2022)ClipWidgets: 3D-printed Modular Tangible UI Extensions for SmartphonesProceedings of the Sixteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3490149.3501314(1-11)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2022
  • (2022)Assessing the Perceived Realism of Kinesthetic Haptic Renderings Under Parameter Variations2022 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS)10.1109/HAPTICS52432.2022.9765610(1-6)Online publication date: 21-Mar-2022
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media