skip to main content
10.1145/3322385.3322401acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Strategic View of IT and Innovativeness

Published:12 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We conduct a much-needed empirical investigation of a widely accepted but under-examined factor regarded as essential for organizational innovativeness. This factor, the organizational view of information technology (IT) as a strategic investment, is expected to result in greater innovativeness than a non-strategic view of IT. We address the surprising lack of empirical validation of this expectation and find empirical support for it. Although a strategic view of IT contributes to greater innovativeness, its explanatory power is limited. Our major finding challenges future researchers to extend theory by incorporating additional factors beyond the strategic view of IT. Our findings also caution managers to be aware that additional factors matter.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, David (2010). "Innovation and Growth: How Business Contributes to Society," Academy of Management Perspectives, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp. 11--24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alter, Steven (2013). "Work System Theory: Overview of Core Concepts, Extensions, and Challenges for the Future," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp. 72--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bennis, Warren. (2004). "'Owed' to Rosabeth Moss Kanter: Impact on management practice." Academy of Management Executive. 18, (2), 106--107.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bisesi, Michael. (1984). "The Change Masters: Innovations for Productivity in the American Corporation, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9 Issue 4, pp. 769--771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chen, Daniel Q.; Mocker, Martin; Preston, David S.; Teubner, Alexander. (2010). "Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp. 233--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fichman, Robert G. (2004). "Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 8, pp. 314--355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Fichman, R.G. (2000) "The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations," in: Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past, R.B. Zmud (ed.), Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Inc., Cincinnati, OH.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Fichman & Melville (2014) Fichman, Robert G. and Melville, Nigel P. (2014). "How Posture-Profile Misalignment in IT Innovation Diminishes Returns: Conceptual Development and Empirical Demonstration," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 203--240.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Gatian, Amy W., Brown, Robert M., and Hicks, James O. (1995). "Organizational Innovativeness, Competitive Strategy and Investment Success," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 43--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Grover, Varun; Teng, James T.C.; Fiedler, Kirk D. (1998). "IS Investment Priorities in Contemporary Organizations," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 41 Issue 2, pp. 40--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hill, C.W.L. and Rothaermel, F.T. (2003). "The Performance of Incumbent Firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, Issue 2, pp. 257--274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Hogan, S. J., Soutar, G. N., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Sweeney, J. C. (2011). Reconceptualizing professional service firm innovation capability: Scale development. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(8), 1264--1273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Hult, G. Tomas M., Hurley, Robert F., Knight, Gary A. (2004). "Innovativeness: Its Antecedents and Impact on Business Performance," Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 33, Issue 5, pp. 429--438.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Kleis, L., Chwelos, P., Ramirez, R. V., and Cockburn, I. (2012). "Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity," Information Systems Research (23:1), pp. 42--59. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Korn Ferry. (2018) "Technology Officer Pulse Survey". Retrieved 2/3/2019 from http://engage.kornferry.com/Global/FileLib/2018_CIO_pulse_survey/Technology_Officer_Pulse_Survey.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Lucas Jr., Henry C.; Agarwal, Ritu; Clemons, Eric K.; El Sawy, Omar A.; and Weber, Bruce (2013). "Impactful Research on Transformational Information Technology: An Opportunity to Inform New Audiences," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue 2, pp. 371--382. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of management Review, 21(1), 135--172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch, Patrick; Walsh, Margaret M.; and Harrington, Denis, (2010). "Defining and Dimensionalizing Organizational Innovativeness," International CHRIE Conference-Refereed Track. 18. Retrieved 3/14/2018 via http://scholarworks.umass.edu/refereed/CHRIE_2010/Saturday/18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ravichandran, T., Han, S., and Mithas, S. 2017. "Mitigating Diminishing Returns to R&D: The Role of Information Technology in Innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 812--827. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Rubera, Gala and Kirca, Ahmet H. (2012). "Firm Innovativeness and Its Performance Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration," Journal of Marketing, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp. 130--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ruvio, Ayalla A.; Shoham, Aviv; Vigoda-Gadot, Eran; and Schwabsky, Nitza (2014). "Organizational Innovativeness: Construct Development and Cross-Cultural Validation," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31, Issue 5, pp. 1004--1022.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Stratopoulos, Theophanis C. and Lim, Jee-Hae (2010). "IT Innovation Persistence: An Oxymoron?" Communications of the ACM, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp. 142--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Subramanian, A. and Nilakanta, S. (1996). "Organizational Innovativeness: Exploring the Relationship between Organizational Determinants of Innovation, Types of Innovations, and Measures of Organizational Performance," Omega, vol. 24, Issue 6, pp. 631--647.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Swanson, E. Burton and Ramiller, Neil C. (2004). "Innovating Mindfully with Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp. 553--583. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Tellis, Gerald J.; Prabhu, Jaideep C.; and Chandy, Rajesh K. (2009). "Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture," Journal of Marketing, Volume 73, Issue 1, pp. 3--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tushman, M. L., & Smith, W. (2002). "Organizational Technology," in The Blackwell Companion to Organizations, Joel Baum (ed), Blackwell Publishers Ltd., UK pp. 386--414Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Tushman, Michael; Smith, Wendy K.; Wood, Robert Chapman; Westerman, George; and O'Reilly, Charles (2010). "Organizational Designs and Innovation Streams," Industrial & Corporate Change, 19(5), pp. 1331--1366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Weiss, Joseph W.; Thorogood, Alan; and Clark, Kevin D. (2006) "Three IT-Business Alignment Profiles: Technical Resource, Business Enabler, and Strategic Weapon," Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 18, Article 33, pp. 676--691.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Yoo, Youngjin; Boland Jr., Richard J.; Lyytinen, Kalle; Majchrzak, Ann (2012). "Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World," Organization Science, Volume 23, Issue 5, pp. 1398--1408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A Strategic View of IT and Innovativeness

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGMIS-CPR '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Computers and People Research Conference
        June 2019
        211 pages
        ISBN:9781450360883
        DOI:10.1145/3322385

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 12 June 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGMIS-CPR '19 Paper Acceptance Rate20of30submissions,67%Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader