skip to main content
10.1145/3322640.3326721acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicailConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

NAI: The Normative Reasoner

Published: 17 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

No abstract available.

References

[1]
Layman E Allen. 1956. Symbolic logic: A razor-edged tool for drafting and interpreting legal documents. Yale LJ 66 (1956), 833.
[2]
Layman E Allen and C Rudy Engholm. 1977. Normalized legal drafting and the query method. J. Legal Educ. 29 (1977), 380.
[3]
Guido Boella, Luigi Di Caro, Llio Humphreys, Livio Robaldo, Piercarlo Rossi, and Leendert van der Torre. 2016. Eunomos, a legal document and knowledge management system for the web to provide relevant, reliable and up-to-date information on the law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 24, 3 (2016), 245--283.
[4]
Anne-Marie Burley and Walter Mattli. 1993. Europe before the court: a political theory of legal integration. International organization 47, 1 (1993), 41--76.
[5]
Henry DeYoung et al. 2010. Experiences in the logical specification of the HIPAA and GLBA privacy laws. In Proc. of the 9th annual ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society. ACM, 73--82.
[6]
Guido Governatori and Sidney Shek. 2013. Regorous: a business process compliance checker. In Proc. of the 14th Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM, 245--246.
[7]
Tomer Libal and Matteo Pascucci. 2018. Automated Reasoning in Normative Detachment Structures with Ideal Conditions. CoRR abs/1810.09993 (2018). arXiv:1810.09993
[8]
Pablo E Navarro and Jorge L Rodríguez. 2014. Deontic logic and legal systems. Cambridge University Press.
[9]
Monica Palmirani and Guido Governatori. 2018. Modelling Legal Knowledge for GDPR Compliance Checking. In Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2018: The Thirty-first Annual Conference, Vol. 313. IOS Press, 101.
[10]
John Zeleznikow and Andrew Stranieri. 1995. The split-up system: integrating neural networks and rule-based reasoning in the legal domain. In Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Artiicial Intelligence and Law. ACM, 185--194.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Administrative prejudice in cases of petty theft (the Article 7.27 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses and the Article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): how the big data of judicial acts reflect humanization and quality of justiceЮридические исследования10.25136/2409-7136.2021.9.36521(81-124)Online publication date: Sep-2021
  • (2021)Application of Machine Learning Metrics for Dynamic E-justice Processes2021 28th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)10.23919/FRUCT50888.2021.9347598(293-300)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Towards Transparent Legal FormalizationExplainable and Transparent AI and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_18(296-313)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
ICAIL '19: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law
June 2019
312 pages
ISBN:9781450367547
DOI:10.1145/3322640
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

  • Univ. of Montreal: University of Montreal
  • AAAI
  • IAAIL: Intl Asso for Artifical Intel & Law

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 17 June 2019

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Automated reasoning
  2. Deontic logic
  3. Graphical user interfaces
  4. Legal reasoning

Qualifiers

  • Demonstration
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

ICAIL '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 69 of 169 submissions, 41%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 08 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Administrative prejudice in cases of petty theft (the Article 7.27 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses and the Article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): how the big data of judicial acts reflect humanization and quality of justiceЮридические исследования10.25136/2409-7136.2021.9.36521(81-124)Online publication date: Sep-2021
  • (2021)Application of Machine Learning Metrics for Dynamic E-justice Processes2021 28th Conference of Open Innovations Association (FRUCT)10.23919/FRUCT50888.2021.9347598(293-300)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2021
  • (2021)Towards Transparent Legal FormalizationExplainable and Transparent AI and Multi-Agent Systems10.1007/978-3-030-82017-6_18(296-313)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2021
  • (2021)Towards Automated GDPR Compliance CheckingTrustworthy AI - Integrating Learning, Optimization and Reasoning10.1007/978-3-030-73959-1_1(3-19)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2021
  • (2020)A Meta-level Annotation Language for Legal TextsLogic and Argumentation10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_9(131-150)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2020
  • (2020)Towards an Executable Methodology for the Formalization of Legal TextsLogic and Argumentation10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3_10(151-165)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2020

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media