skip to main content
10.1145/3323716.3323759acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieeaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Voltage output comparison of self-sustaining and externally powered fixed angle, single axis and dual axis solar tracking systems

Published:16 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Dual axis solar tracking system generates the highest power against single axis and fixed panel. For self-sustaining small scale solar tracking system however, power consumption from its system may be too high, causing disruption to power generation. Self-sustaining system is when the system's solar panel provides its own power to its battery without additional external power. This paper provides evidence by comparing voltage outputs from 3 solar tracking systems that self-sustaining, small solar panel is not efficient enough to use dual axis solar tracking system. Power consumption in small solar panel system was found to increase by 175% and 100% while voltage generation may drop by 6V and 3V for battery charging when the system utilized dual axis and single axis tracking capability respectively when under self-sustained powering. Externally powered system generate 13% more voltage compared to self-sustaining system and this depends on how many times the battery in self-sustaining system needs to be charged.

References

  1. Rizk, J. and Chaiko, Y., 2008, Solar Tracking System: More Efficient Use of Solar Panels, World Acad. of Sci., Eng. and Techno., 41, 313--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Deepthi, S., Ponni, A., Ranjitha, R. and Dhanabal, R., 2013, Comparison of Efficiencies of Single-Axis Tracking System and Dual-Axis Tracking System with Fixed Mount, Int. J. Eng. Sci. and Inno. Techno., 2, 2, 425--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhan, T. S., Lin, W. M., Tsai, M. H. and Wang, G. S, 2013, Design and implementation of the dual-axis solar tracking system, IEEE 37<sup>th</sup> Annu. Comp. Soft. & Appli. Conf., 276--277. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Wang, J. M. and Lu., C. L., 2013, Design and implementation of a sun tracker with a dual-axis single-motor for an optical sensor-based photovoltaic system, Sensors, 13, 3157--3168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mohaimin, A. H., Uddin, M. R., Law, F. K., 2018, Design and fabrication of single-axis and dual-axis solar tracking systems, IEEE Stu. Conf. Res. Eng. & Dev. unpublished.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mousazadeh, H., Keyhani, A., Javadi, A., Mobli, H., Abrinia, K. and Sharifi, A., 2009, A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output, Renew. & Sust. Ene. Rev., 13, 1800--1818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jinayim, T., Arunrungrasmi, J., Tanitteerapan, T., Mungkung, N., 2007, Highly efficient low power consumption tracking solar cells for white LED-based lighting system, Int. J. Ele. Com. & Sys. Eng., 1, 1307--5179.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Abdallah, S., 2004, The effect of using sun tracking systems on the voltage-current characteristics and power generation of flat plate PV, Ener. Conv. & Manag., 45, 1671--1679.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Abdallah, S. and Badran, O. O., 2008, Sun tracking system for productivity of solar still, Desalination, 220, 669--676.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Abu-Khader M. M., Badran, O. O. and Abdallah, S., 2008, Evaluating multi-axes sun-tracking system of different modes of operation in Jordan, Renew. & Sust. Ene. Rev., 12, 864--873.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Khalifa, A. J. N. and Al-Mutawalli, S. S., 1998, Effect of two-axis sun tracking on the performance of compound parabolic concentrators, Ene. Conv. & Manag. 39, 10, 1073--1079.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Koussa, M., Cheknane, A., Hadji, S., Haddadi, M. and Noureddine, S., 2011, Measured and modelled improvement in solar energy yield from flat plate photovoltaic systems utilizing different tracking systems and under a range of environmental conditions, Appl. Ene., 88, 1756--1771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Beringer, S., Schilke, H., Lohse, I. and Seckmeyer, G., 2011, Case study showing that the tilt angle of photovoltaic plants is nearly irrelevant, Sol. Ene., 85, 470--476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Li, D. H. W. and Lam, T. N. T, 2007, Determining the optimum tilt angle and orientation for solar energy collection based on measured solar radiance data, Int. J. of Photoen., 2007, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohaimin A. H., Uddin, M. R., Hashim, H., Tuah, N. and Zahari, M. R., 2018, Design and simulation of single-axis and dual-axis solar tracking systems, Bru. Int. Conf. Eng. & Techno., unpublished.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Voltage output comparison of self-sustaining and externally powered fixed angle, single axis and dual axis solar tracking systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        IEEA '19: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Informatics, Environment, Energy and Applications
        March 2019
        281 pages
        ISBN:9781450361040
        DOI:10.1145/3323716

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 March 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader