skip to main content
10.1145/3325291.3325365acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Proposal for Subjective Evaluation Method in Small Sample using Visual Analog Scale

Authors Info & Claims
Published:29 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research on impression evaluation such as painting, music, and design is widely implemented in the field of psychology / affective engineering. However, the style of the questionnaire is stepwise in the most case. Numerical values obtained from these questionnaires are treated as interval measures in many cases for convenience but should be handled as an ordinal scale in a strict sense. We propose a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which marks one point on a straight line as an evaluation value, not a stepwise style. It became possible to perform statistical analysis to comprehend the overall tendency even in a subjective evaluation experiment of a small sample. The feature is to visualize the experimental results by overlaying a box-and-whisker plot and a univariate scatter plot. We conducted an impression evaluation experiment on a representational painting and an abstract painting for the same group of subjects. The number of adjective pairs is 15, and the number of subjects is 30. The box-and-whisker plots can intuitively understand the distribution and trend of the whole. Furthermore, we compare two paintings using hierarchical clustering and could see common clusters. Also, we show box-whisker charts in which the data is pseudo-converted into five stages and clarify the difference between VAS and LS.

References

  1. Shirahama, N., Watanabe, S., Nakaya, N. and Mori, Y. 2018. A Proposal for New Subjective Evaluation Analysis Method using the Visual Analog Scale. In Proceedings of the 6th IIAE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Image Processing 2018 (ICISIP2018), pp. 200--204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Winham SJ and Garovic VD. 2015. Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm, PLoS Biol 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002128Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mayumi Nakajima. 2015. Visual Analogue Scale Use in Pain Assessment: A Literature Review, Seisen J. Nurs. Stud., Vol. 4. pp. 83--90. (in Japanese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Watanabe, S., Shirahama, N., Tsukamoto, H. 2016. Matsumoto, Y., Nakagawa, M., Miyamoto, K., Nakaya, N., Tomita, M. and Mori, Y., Trend of the Subjective Evaluation Based on Visual Analog Scale and Likert Scale, ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications (ICIC-ELB), 7(1), pp. 37--42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Shirahama, N., Watanabe, S., Ikegami, F., Nakaya N. and Mori, Y. 2017. A Study on the Impression Received from the Response of a Communication Robot, Proceedings of the 5th IIAE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Image Processing 2017 (ICISIP2017) pp. 335--338.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Watanabe, S., Tsuruta, T., Shirahama, N., Nakaya, N., Matsumoto, Y., Tsukamoto, H. and Mori, Y. 2018. Visualizations of Subjective Evaluation for the Participation Attitude to the Internet of Male College Students Based on Visual Analog Scale. In Proceedings of the 6th IIAE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Image Processing 2018 (ICISIP2018) pp. 193--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Watanabe, S., Takaue, R., Fenghui Yao, Matsumoto, Y., Tsukamoto, H., Shirahama, N., Nakaya, N. and Mori, Y. 2018. Effects of 1/f Fluctuation Music Listening on Autonomic Nervous System Activity, Journal of the Institute of Industrial Applications Engineers, 6(2), pp. 86--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Watanabe, S., Shirahama, N., Matsumoto, Y., Tsukamoto, H., Nakagawa, M., Miyamoto, K., Nakaya, N., Tomita, M. and Mori, Y. 2016. Distribution Trend of the Information Skills for Students Based on Visual Analog Scale and Likert Scale, International Journal of Biomedical Soft Computing and Human Sciences, 20(2), pp. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shirahama, N., Watanabe, S., Ikegami, F. and Mori Y. 2016. Development of VAS app to Improve Youth Mental Health Research Environment, ICIC Express Letters, Part B: Applications (ICIC-ELB), 7(9), pp. 1939--1944.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Andrew Wyeth. 1952. Faraway. In Andrew Wyeth Work collection (2017), page 39, Tokyo Bijutshu, Tokyo Japan. (in Japanese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackson Pollock. 1947. Galaxy. In Artists of the 20th Century 15 (2008) page 47, Nigensha, Tokyo Japan. (in Japanese)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jackson Pollock. 1947. Galaxy. Retrieved from https://www.jackson-pollock.org/galaxy.jspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Morihiro Okada and Jun Inoue. 1991. A psychological analysis about the elements of artistic evaluation on viewing paintings. The educational sciences Journal of the Yokohama National University, 31, pp. 45--66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Shigeru Ichihara. 2009. The Perspective of the Research for the Semantic Differential and the Problems to Be Solved, General remarks, Kansei Information Processing Research Group, pp. 263--269. https://doi.org/10.5100/jje.45.263Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Proposal for Subjective Evaluation Method in Small Sample using Visual Analog Scale

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ACIT '19: Proceedings of the 7th ACIS International Conference on Applied Computing and Information Technology
        May 2019
        248 pages
        ISBN:9781450371735
        DOI:10.1145/3325291

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 29 May 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader