skip to main content
10.1145/3325480.3326555acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Artistic Vision: Providing Contextual Guidance for Capture-Time Decisions

Published:13 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

With the increased popularity of cameras, more and more people are interested in learning photography. People are willing to invest in expensive cameras as a medium for their artistic expression, but few have access to in-person classes to help improve upon their artistic skills. Inspired by critique sessions common in in-person art practice classes, we propose design principles for creative learning. We focus on applying these principles to design new interfaces that provide contextual in-camera feedback to aid users in learning visual elements of photography. We interactively visualize results of image processing algorithms as additional information for the user at capture-time. In this paper, we describe our design principles, and apply these principles in the design of three guided photography interfaces: one to explore lighting options for a portrait, one to highlight overall composition, and one to aid in de-cluttering.

References

  1. Susan A. Ambrose, Michael W. Bridges, Michele DiPietro, Marsha C. Lovett, and Marie K. Norman. 2010. How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Zoya Bylinskii, Tilke Judd, Ali Borji, Laurent Itti, Frédo Durand, Aude Oliva, and Antonio Torralba. 2015. Mit saliency benchmark. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Jennifer M. Zosh, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, James H. Gray, Michael B. Robb, and Jordy Kaufman. 2015. Putting Education in “Educational” Apps: Lessons From the Science of Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16, 1 (2015), 3--34. PMID: 25985468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Fil Hunter, Steven Biver, and Paul Fuqua. 2015. Light Science & Magic: An Introduction to Photographic Lighting. Focal Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Qifan Li and Daniel Vogel. 2017. Guided Selfies Using Models of Portrait Aesthetics. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 179--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hiroko Mitarai, Yoshihiro Itamiya, and Atsuo Yoshitaka. 2013. Interactive photographic shooting assistance based on composition and saliency. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. Springer, 348--363.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Markus Neuh"auser. 2011. Wilcoxon--mann--whitney test. In International encyclopedia of statistical science. Springer, 1656--1658.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Artistic Vision: Providing Contextual Guidance for Capture-Time Decisions

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition
          June 2019
          745 pages
          ISBN:9781450359177
          DOI:10.1145/3325480

          Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 13 June 2019

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          C&C '19 Paper Acceptance Rate30of101submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader