skip to main content
10.1145/3325480.3326557acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesc-n-cConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Feedback and Creativity: A Practice-Exploration in Design Studios

Published:13 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

The effect of feedback as an educational tool to nurture creativity varies via circumstances. My dissertation will propose an authentic-performance-based investigation of effective practices of feedback on creativity in an interior design studio. The primary work found that students with high feedback receptivity outperformed in creativity. The next step is examining the smaller percentage of those with low feedback receptivity but still achieved decent creative outcomes.

References

  1. National Endowment for the Arts. The U.S. Arts and Cultural Production Satellite Account (1998--2015). 2018. Retrieved March 15, 2019 from https://www.arts.gov/artistic-fields/research-analysis/arts-data-profiles/arts-data-profile-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Yu-Chun Grace Yen, Steven P. Dow, Elizabeth Gerber, Brian P. Bailey. 2017. Listen to Others, Listen to Yourself: Combining Feedback Review and Reflection to Improve Iterative Design. In Proceedings of 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '17), 158--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Steven P. Dow, Alana Glassco, Jonathan Kass, Melissa Schwarz, Daniel L. Schwartz, Scott R. Klemmer. 2010. Parallel Prototyping Leads to Better Design Results, More Divergence, and Increased Self-Efficacy. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 17, 4: 18:1--18:24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ron Pat-El, Harm Tillema, Sabine W.M. van Koppen. 2012. Effects of Formative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation: Examining Ethnic Differences. Learning and Individual Differences 22, 4 (2012), 449--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brian Frank, Natalie Simper, James Kauup. 2018. Formative Feedback and Scaffolding in Developing Complex Problem Solving and Modeling Outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education 43, 4 (2018), 552--568.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Y. Wayne Wu and Brian P. Bailey. 2017. Bitter Sweet or Sweet Bitter? How Valence Order and Source Identity Influence Feedback Acceptance. In Proceedings of 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '17), 137--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Agnoli S., Runco M., Kirsch C., Corazza G. 2018. The role of motivation in the prediction of creative achievement inside and outside of school environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity 28 (2018),167--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Alwin de Rooij, Philip J. Corr, Sara Jones. 2017. Creativity and Emotion: Enhancing Creative Thinking by the Manipulation of Computational Feedback to Determine Emotional Intensity. In Proceedings of 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (C&C '17), 148--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Wooten O., Ulrich T. 2017. Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production and Operations Management 26, 1 (2017), 80--99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Woodman R., Sawyer J., Griffin R. 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review 18, 2 (1993), 293--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Kudrowitz B. and Wallace D. 2012. Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design 24, 2 (2012), 120--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Gabora L. 2010. Revenge of the ?Neurds": Characterizing creative thought in terms of the structure and dynamics of memory. Creativity Research Journal 22, 1 (2010), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Green A., Kraemer D., Fugelsang J., Gray J., Dunbar K. 2012. Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 38, 2 (2012), 264--272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Koutstaal W. and Binks J. 2015. Innovating minds: Rethinking creativity to inspire change. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sawyer R. 2012. The science of human innovation: Explaining creativity. New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Baer J. 2015. The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review 37, 3 (2015), 165--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Huang P., Peng S., Chen H., Tseng L., Hsu L. 2017. The relative influences of domain knowledge and domain-general divergent thinking on scientific creativity and mathematical creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity 25 (2017), 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Kane M. and Mitchell R. 2013. Implementing performance assessment: Promises, problems, and challenges. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Amabile T. 1982. Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43, 5 (1982) 997--1013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Asojo A. 2013. Connecting Academia with Industry: Pedagogical experiences from a collaborative design project. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 105 (2013), 304--313.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Oygur I. and McCoy J. 2011. User: Inspiration or constraint? Journal of Interior Design 36, 3 (2011), 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Vo H. and Asojo A. 2018. Feedback Responsiveness and Students' Creativity. Academic Exchange Quarterly 1, 1 (2018), 53--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Cseh G. and Jeffries K. 2019. A Scattered CAT: A Critical Evaluation of the Consensual Assessment Technique for Creativity Research. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Arter J. and Chappuis J. 2006. Creating & recognizing quality rubrics. Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Amabile T. 2012. Componential theory of creativity. Harvard Business School 12, 96 (2012), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Feedback and Creativity: A Practice-Exploration in Design Studios

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      C&C '19: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Creativity and Cognition
                      June 2019
                      745 pages
                      ISBN:9781450359177
                      DOI:10.1145/3325480

                      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 13 June 2019

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • abstract

                      Acceptance Rates

                      C&C '19 Paper Acceptance Rate30of101submissions,30%Overall Acceptance Rate108of371submissions,29%

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader