skip to main content
10.1145/3326172.3326176acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Electrochemical DNA Sensor Based On Graphene/Zirconia Nanocomposite for Label-Free Detection of Exon-19 Mutations in Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this study, a specific impedimetric DNA sensor based on graphene/zirconia nanocomposite has been developed to serve as a simple and rapid method for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations testing, necessary to guide the treatment regime of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) therapy. The graphene/zirconia nanocomposite was synthesized via a green method without the use of harsh chemicals. The as-synthesized nanocomposite was characterized with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffractometry (XRD) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) to evaluate its morphology, crystallinity and composition. The nanocomposite was functionalized with 1-pyrenebutyric acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (PSE) and dropped casted on screen printed electrode (SPCE) to provide amide bonding with single-stranded probe-DNA that is complementary to exon-19 wild-type DNA sequence. Electrochemical responses of each assembly step of the sensing platform were characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Deposition of PSE-functionalized graphene/zirconia and immobilization of single-stranded DNA on the electrode were reflected by the increment of electron transfer resistance (Rct) in EIS analysis as well as the reduction of peak current (ip) in CV analysis. The modified electrodes were hybridized with different target DNAs and the difference in electrochemical impedance before and after hybridization (normalized value) was adopted as the measurement for label-free DNA hybridization detection. The developed genosensor demonstrated strong distinction between the Rct for exon-19 wild-type DNA to exon-19 mutated DNA, leading to promising quantitation of DNA mutations. The biosensor also exhibited high specificity to exon-19 sequence with clear discrimination against non-complementary target. The developed biosensor is disposable and requires no labelling of probe or target, making it beneficial in terms of simplicity and efficiency.

References

  1. American Cancer Society 2018. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta:American Cancer Society.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Borgonovo, A.E. et al. 2013. Evaluation of the success criteria for zirconia dental implants: A four-year clinical and radiological study. International Journal of Dentistry. 2013, (2013).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Chia, J.S.Y. et al. 2015. A bio-electrochemical sensing platform for glucose based on irreversible, non-covalent pi-pi functionalization of graphene produced via a novel, green synthesis method. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical. 210, (2015), 558--565.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chia, J.S.Y. et al. 2014. A novel one step synthesis of graphene via sonochemical-assisted solvent exfoliation approach for electrochemical sensing application. Chemical Engineering Journal. 249, (2014), 270--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Gao, F. et al. 2013. Application of graphene-pyrenebutyric acid nanocomposite as probe oligonucleotide immobilization platform in a DNA biosensor. Materials Science and Engineering C. 33, 7 (2013), 3851--3857.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jackman, D.M. et al. 2006. Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clinical Cancer Research. 12, 13 (2006), 3908--3914.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Jänne, P.A. and Johnson, B.E. 2006. Effect of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase domain mutations on the outcome of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Clinical Cancer Research. 12, 14 (2006), 4416s--4420s.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kaplan, A. et al. 2017. Current and future directions in electron transfer chemistry of graphene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 15 (2017), 4530--4571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kumar, S. et al. 2016. Nanostructured zirconia decorated reduced graphene oxide based efficient biosensing platform for non-invasive oral cancer detection. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 78, (2016), 497--504.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Lin, L.P. et al. 2018. A disposable electrochemical sensing platform for acetaminophen based on graphene/zrO2 nanocomposite produced via a facile, green synthesis method. IEEE Sensors Journal. 18, 19 (2018), 7907--7916.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Lu, J. et al. 2008. Synthesis and characterization of core-shell structural MWNT-zirconia nanocomposites. Nano Letters. 8, 11 (2008), 4070--4074.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Peng, H.P. et al. 2015. Label-free electrochemical DNA biosensor for rapid detection of mutidrug resistance gene based on Au nanoparticles/toluidine blue-graphene oxide nanocomposites. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical. 207, Part A (2015), 269--276.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Rafiee-Pour, H.A. et al. 2016. A novel label-free electrochemical miRNA biosensor using methylene blue as redox indicator: Application to breast cancer biomarker miRNA-21. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 77, (2016), 202--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Siegel, R.L. et al. 2017. Cancer Statistics, 2018. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 67, 1 (2017), 7--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Singh, A. et al. 2013. Graphene oxide-chitosan nanocomposite based electrochemical DNA biosensor for detection of typhoid. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical. 185, (2013), 675--684.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh, S. et al. 2017. Ultrasensitive nanohybrid DNA sensor for detection of pathogen to prevent damage of heart valves. Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical. 246, (2017), 300--304.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Sriram, K.B. et al. 2011. Screening for activating EGFR mutations in surgically resected nonsmall cell lung cancer. European Respiratory Journal. 38, 4 (2011), 903--910.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sumana, G. et al. 2010. A novel urea biosensor based on zirconia. Thin Solid Films. 519, 3 (2010), 1187--1191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Teymourian, H. et al. 2014. One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of zirconium dioxide nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide composite as high performance electrochemical sensing and biosensing platform. Electrochimica Acta. 143, (2014), 196--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Wang, J. 2005. Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors. Analyst. 130, 4 (2005), 421--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wang, W. et al. 2015. Low fouling label-free DNA sensor based on polyethylene glycols decorated with gold nanoparticles for the detection of breast cancer biomarkers. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 71, (2015), 51--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Xu, X.W. et al. 2016. Detection EGFR exon 19 status of lung cancer patients by DNA electrochemical biosensor. Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 80, (2016), 411--417.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Zeng, Y. et al. 2018. A sensitive label-free electrochemical immunosensor for detection of cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen 21-1 based on 3D graphene with gold nanopaticle modified electrode. Talanta. 178, June 2017 (2018), 122--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Electrochemical DNA Sensor Based On Graphene/Zirconia Nanocomposite for Label-Free Detection of Exon-19 Mutations in Lung Cancer: A Preliminary Study

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBET '19: Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology
      March 2019
      327 pages
      ISBN:9781450361309
      DOI:10.1145/3326172

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader