skip to main content
10.1145/3326172.3326193acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbetConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Innovative Approach to Safe Surgical Suturing Part II: Data Machine Learning Predictive Analysis

Published:28 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-invasive robotized surgery is nowadays largely in action for most interventions because of its very beneficial advantages in terms of patient health and material efficiency. However, the still recurrent problem of guaranteeing the quality of suturing action (ie avoiding thread breaking) in all robotized interventions is recurrently impairing the overall results from this approach, mainly due to defective haptic information on threads available to the surgeons from the robot. To improve the efficiency of robot-surgeon collaboration, the problem of communicating relevant and reliable information on threads used by surgeons during suturing is addressed in present paper. From collected data on an experimental setup designed for the study described in Part I, machine learning predictive analysis is built-up in present Part. The approach helps understand the influence of different parameters on the suture ruptures and determine the safety zone in which the surgeon can pull the thread without danger. A display can be added to give the surgeon a visual return during the operations. Results obtained for different types of threads show up to 99% predictive accuracy, especially concerning maximum strength and maximum elongation of a suture before breaking.

References

  1. T.A. Rockall, A.W. Darzi: Tele-manipulator Robots in Surgery, Br J Surg., Vol.90, pp. 641--643, 2003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. M.J. Mack: Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, JAMA, Vol.285, pp. 568--572, 2001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J.H. Palep: Robotic Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery, J Minim Access Surg., Vol.5(1), pp. 1--7, 2009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Marescaux, J. Leroy, F. Rubino, M. Smith, M. Vix, M. Simone, D. Mutter: Transcontinental Robot-assisted Remote Telesurgery: Feasibility and Potential Applications, Ann Surg., Vol. 235(4), pp. 487--492, 2002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. G.B. Cadiere, J. Himpens, O. Germay, R. Izizaw M. Degueldre, J. Vandromme, E. Capelluto, J. Bruyns: Feasibility of Robotic Laparoscopic Surgery: 146 cases, World J Surg, Vol.25, pp. 1467--1477, 2001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. M.O. Schurr, H. Breitwieser, A. Melzer, W. Kunert, M. Schmitt, U. Voges et al.: Experimental Telemanipulation in Endoscopic Surgery, Surg Laparosc Endosc. Vol.6, pp. 167--175, 1996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. M. Grunwald: Human Haptic Perception: Basics Applications, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 2008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Dahiya R.S., Valle M.: Robotic Tactile Sensing. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Tactile Sensing Technologies; pp. 79--136, 2013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. M.I. Tiwana, S.J. Redmond, N.H. Lovell: A Review of Tactile Sensing Technologies with Applications in Biomedical Engineering, Sens. Actuators A Phys., Vol.179, pp. 17--31, 2012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. Zou, C. Ge, Z.J. Wang, E. Cretu, X. Li: Novel Tactile Sensor Technology and Smart Tactile Sensing Systems: A Review, Sensors, Vol.17(11), pp. 26--53, 2017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. T. Horeman, E. Meijer, J.J. Harlaar, J.F. Lange, J.J. van den Dobbelsteen, J. Dankelman: Force Sensing in Surgical Sutures, PLoS One, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Martell, Th. Elmer, N. Gopalsami, Y.S. Park: Visual Measurement of Suture Strain for Robotic Surgery, Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. C.E. Reiley, T. Akinbiyi, D. Burschka, D.C. Chang, A.M. Okamura, D.D. Yuh: Effects of Visual Force Feedback on Robot-Assisted Surgical Task Performance, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A.M. Okamura: Haptic Feedback in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery, Curr. Opin. Urol., Vol.19(1), pp. 102--107,2009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. S. Ehrampoosh, M. Dave, M.A. Kia, C. Rablau, M.H. Zadeh: Providing Haptic Feedback in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery: a Direct Optical Force-Sensing Solution for Haptic Rendering of Deformable Bodies, Comput Aided Surg. Vol.18(5-6), pp. 129--141, 2013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. E. Silver, R. Wu, J. Grady, L.S. Song: Knot Security- How is it Affected by Suture Technique, Material, Size, and Number of Throws?, J Oral Maxillofac Surg., Vol.74(7), pp. 1304--1312, 2016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. B. Fong, S. Malak, Anderson: Tensile Strength of Surgical Knots in Abdominal Wound Closure, ANZ J. Surgery, Vol.78(3), pp. 164--166, 2008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. H. Mayer, F. Gomez, D. Wierstra, I. Nagy, A. Knoll, J. Schmidhuber: A System for Robotic Heart that Learns to Tie Knots Using Recurrent Neural Networks, Advanced Robotics, Vol.22(13-14), pp. 1521--1537, 2008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. A.R. Lanfranco, A.E. Castellanos, J.P. Desai, W.C. Meyers: Robotic Surgery, A Current Perspective, Ann Surg., Vol.239(1), pp. 14--21, 2004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. A. Levy, A. De Muer, J. Msellati: An Innovative Approach to Safe Surgical Suturing Part I-Experimental Setup and Tests Protocol, to be publishedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. D.B. Suits: Use of Dummy Vzariables in Regression Equationq, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc., Vol.52(280), pp. 548--551, 1957Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. E. Zdravevski, P. Lameski, A. Kulakov: Advanced Transformations for Nominal and Categorical Data into Numeric Data in Supervised Learning Problems, Proc. 10th Conf. for Informatics and Information Technology (CIIT), pp. 142--146, 2013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Innovative Approach to Safe Surgical Suturing Part II: Data Machine Learning Predictive Analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICBET '19: Proceedings of the 2019 9th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Technology
        March 2019
        327 pages
        ISBN:9781450361309
        DOI:10.1145/3326172

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 March 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader