skip to main content
10.1145/3326365.3326371acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

E-Toll Laut: Blockchain Port as the Key for Realizing Indonesia's Maritime Fulcrum

Published:03 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Since the concept of Indonesia as the world's maritime fulcrum was initiated in 2014, the Government of Indonesia has begun to quickly formulate Indonesia's maritime connectivity policy. Indonesia's so-called "sea highway" (Tol Laut) program is one of them. However, this policy is considered to be less effective in solving logistical distribution chain problems which often caused the high price of basic goods in the market. Based on the results of the authors' observation, the process of dismantling containers at Indonesian ports can take more than 4 days. This is quite alarming, Indonesian port is the key to logistics distribution both between Indonesian islands and the international world, yet the condition. Therefore, the writing team formulated a concept of Indonesian "E-Toll Laut" (sea e-highway) policy as an e-governance solution to improve port management in Indonesia. E-Toll Laut itself is a name that the team of authors designates to explain the mechanism of blockchain port management in Indonesia. Based on the author's research team, this system is proven to be able to guarantee accountability, simplify the monitoring process, and accelerate bureaucratic processes and port transactions that are considered as accidents of the dwelling time process in Indonesia. The writing team then used Makassar port as a case study to give clearer picture for the problem.

References

  1. Cas van der Baan, Adhi Dipo, David Wignal, Dini Takola, Hafida Fahmiasari, and Vincent Hinssen. 2015. State of Logistics Indonesia 2015, Jakarta, indonesia: World Bank.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Coen Van Dijk, Pieter Van de Mheen, and Martin Bloem. 2015. Indonesia Maritime Hotspot, Rotterdam, Netherland: nederland maritiem land.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mary R. Brooks and Kevin Cullinane. 2007. Devolution, port governance and port performance, Amsterdam: Elsevier-JAI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Magali Delmas and Yesim Tokat. 2005. Deregulation Process, Governance Structures and Efficiency: The U.S. Electric Utility Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal (2005), 441--460.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Isaac Dyner and Erik Larsen. 2001. From Planning to Strategy in the Elctricity Industry. Energy Policy 29, 13 (November 2001), 1145--1154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Mattia Francisconi. 2017. An explorative study on blockchain technology in application to port logistics. thesis. Delft: Delft University of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Muhammad Idris, Muh Asdar, and Ganding Sitepu. 2017. The feasibility analysis of container terminal in Makassar as an international port of era free trade. Int. Ref. J. Eng. Sci 6 (2017), 46--52.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Patot, V. 1973. Introduction to Transport Policy. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Erwin Raza. 2013. Development of National Logistics System Framework, Jakarta: Ministry for Economic Affairs Republic of Indonesia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Eva Harpøth Skjoldborg. 2015. Sustainability Report 2015, Copenhagen: Maersk.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ganding Sitepu and Oktavera Sulistiana. 2014. Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Operasional Terminal Peti Kemas Makassar dan Bitung. Celebes Ocean Science and Engineering Seminar 2 (2014), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sy Firmansyah, Muhammad Ruslin Anwar, and Alwafi Pujiraharjo. 2016. Kajian Pengembangan pelabuhan Makasar. REKAYASA SIPIL 10, 1 (2016), 10--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert Wagenaar. 1992. Interorganizational Systems in the Global Environment. In Business Network Redesign-Lessons from the Port of Rotterdam Simulation Game. 390--404Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nuria Rodríguez Domínguez and Charles Bastos Rodríguez. 2010. Introduction to e-Government: ICT-driven Change Management, Project Management and Process Management, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina: Atos Origin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Mohammed Alshehri and Steve Drew. E-GOVERNMENT FUNDAMENTALS. In IADIS International Conference ICT, Society and Human Beings 2010. Freiburg: IADIS.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Valentina Dardha Ndou. 2004. E - Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 18, 1 (2004), 1--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Pwc. 2018. Proof of Concept For a National Trade Community System, Sydney, Australia: PricewaterhouseCoopers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. E-Toll Laut: Blockchain Port as the Key for Realizing Indonesia's Maritime Fulcrum

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEGOV '19: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
      April 2019
      538 pages
      ISBN:9781450366441
      DOI:10.1145/3326365

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 April 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ICEGOV '19 Paper Acceptance Rate81of171submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate350of865submissions,40%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader