skip to main content
10.1145/3328020.3353908acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Games and technical communication at the crossroads: defining and designing game studies

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As connections between professional and technical communication (PTC) scholarship and games studies increase, interrogating the disciplinary landscape of game studies becomes necessary. This project presents a strategy for mixed-method analysis to undertake that interrogation, in line with the social justice turn in PTC.

References

  1. Samuel Coavoux, Maneul Boutet, and Vinciane Zabban. 2017. We we know about games: A scientometric approach to game studies in the 2000s. Games and Culture 12, 6 (2017), 563--584. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1555412016676661Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sebastian Deterding. 2017. The pyrrhic victory of game studies: Assessing the past, present, and future of interdisciplinary game research. Games and Culture 12, 6 (2017), 521--543.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jennifer deWinter and Ryan Moeller. 2014. Playing the field: Technical communication for technical games. In Computer games and technical communication: Critical methods and applications at the intersection. Ashgate, New York, NY, 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kishonna Gray. 2015. #CiteHerWork: Marginalizing women in academic and journalistic writing. http://www.kishonnagray.com/manifestmy-reality/citeherwork-marginalizing-women-in-academic-and-journalistic-writingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Natasha N. Jones. 2016. The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46, 3 (2016), 342--361. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0047281616639472Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Alisha Karabinus. 2017. We are building histories: On the need for feminist game studies. http://www.nymgamer.com/?p=16637Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tracey Lien. 2013. No girls allowed. Polygon (Dec. 2013). https://www.polygon.com/features/2013/12/2/5143856/no-girls-allowedGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Nina Lykke. 2018. Can't bibliometric analysts do better? How quality assessment without field expertise does not work. Scientometrics 117, 1 (2018), 655--666. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-018-2872-xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Edward Melcer, Truon-Huy Dinh Nguyen, Zhengxing Chen, Alessandro Canossa, Magy Seif El-Nasr, and Katherine Isbister. 2015. Games research today: Analyzing the academic landscape 2000--2014. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. Pacific Grove, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Janet H Murray. 2005. The last word on ludology v narratology in game studies. In International DiGRA Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Celia Pearce. 2016. Curating for diversity. In Diversifying Barbie and Mortal Kombat: Intersectional Perspectives and Inclusive Designs in Gaming, Yasmin B. Kafai, Gabriela T. Richard, and Brendesha M. Tynes (Eds.). ETC Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 200--218.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Bailey Poland. 2016. Haters: Harassment, abuse, and violence online. Potomac Books, Linconl, NE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Adrienne Shaw. 2018. Are we there yet? The politics and practice of intersectional feminist game studies. NYMG: Feminist Game Studies 1, 1 (2018). https://www.nymgamer.com/?p=17528Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jaakko Stenros. 2017. The game definition game: A review. Games and culture 12, 6 (2017), 499--520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Patricia Sullivan. 2017. Beckon, encounter, experience: The danger of control and the promise of encounters in the study of user experience. Rhetoric and experience architecture (2017), 17--40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Games and technical communication at the crossroads: defining and designing game studies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '19: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      October 2019
      308 pages
      ISBN:9781450367905
      DOI:10.1145/3328020

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate85of105submissions,81%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader