skip to main content
10.1145/3328020.3353911acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Optimizing design thinking: theatrical improv's effects on creativity within groups

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study builds upon current research correlating the relationship among improvisation (improv), divergent thinking, and emotions. A recent study looked at the affect improv had on an individual's ability to think divergently and effect their emotional state. My research extends this inquiry and examines the question: How does improv affect a group's ability to think divergently as it relates to the Design Thinking process? Using a modified version of the Alternative Use Test (AUT) and traditional Profile of Mood States - Short Form (POMS-SF) to measure a groups divergent thinking ability and mood, I will compare results from a control and treatment group.

References

  1. Lewis, C., & Lovatt, P. J. (2013). Breaking away from set patterns of thinking: Improvisation and divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 9, 46--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Rice-Bailey, T. (2019). Using Improvisational Games to Teach Collaboration Skills to University Students. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, S., & Kline, C. (2019). How to yes-and: Using improvisational games to improv(e) communication, listening, and collaboration techniques in tourism and hospitality education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 24, 130--142. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Stewart, C. (2016). Effects of Improv Comedy on College Students. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2013). Design Thinking Understand - Improve - Apply. Berlin: Springer Berlin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent Thinking as an Indicator of Creative Potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), 66--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Zhou, L. (2018, February 05). University Innovation. Retrieved from https://dschool.stanford.edu/programs/university-innovation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Spolin, V. (2017). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Eastford, CT: Martino Fine Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnstone, K., & Wardle, I. (2019). Impro: Improvisation and the theatre. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Elsevier/Academic Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Shacham, S. (1983). A Shortened Version of the Profile of Mood States. Journal of Personality Assessment, 47 (3), 305--306. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. McNair, D. M., Lorr, M., & Droppleman, L. F. (1992). Edits manual for the Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Optimizing design thinking: theatrical improv's effects on creativity within groups

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SIGDOC '19: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
      October 2019
      308 pages
      ISBN:9781450367905
      DOI:10.1145/3328020

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • extended-abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGDOC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate85of105submissions,81%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader