skip to main content
10.1145/3328020.3353913acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Comparative study of networked communities, crisis communication, and technology: rhetoric of disaster in Nepal earthquake and hurricane Maria

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In April and May 2015, Nepal suffered two massive earthquakes of 7.5 and 6.5 magnitudes in the Richter scale, killing 8856 and injuring 22,309. Two years later in September 2017, Puerto Rico underwent category five hurricane Maria, killing an estimate of 800 to 8000 people and displacing hundreds of thousands of Puerto Ricans [1]. This poster presents preliminary results from a comparative study of Nepal's and Puerto Rico's networked communities who used crisis communication practices to address the havoc created by the disaster. This mixed methods research uses assemblage theory and comparative rhetorics to argue that disasters create situations where networked communities emerge with innovative digital composition practices.

References

  1. N. Kishore, D. Marqués, A. Mahmud, MV. Kiang MV, I Rodriguez, A. Fuller, et al. 2018. Mortality in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. New England Journal of Medicine 12, 379, 2, (Jul. 2018), 162--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Liza Potts. 2014. Social media in disaster response: how experience architects can build for participation. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chris Ingraham. 2015. Affective ecologies: The cultural public sphere in a digital world. Ph.D. Dissertations. University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. UMI Order Number: 3704725Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Robert R. Johnson. 1998. User-centered technology: a rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Liza Potts and, Michael J. Salvo. 2017. Rhetoric and experience architecture. Parlor Press, Anderson, SC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruno Latour. 2005. Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Clay Spinuzzi. 2003. Tracing genres through organizations: a sociocultural approach to information design. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Manuel DeLanda M. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press; Edinburgh, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. John Scott. 2000. Social network analysis: a handbook. (2nd. Ed.) Sage Publications, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Stamely Wasserman and Katherine Faust. 1994 Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York. NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Zizi Papacharisi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. Oxford University Press, New York. NYGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. LuMing Mao. 2013. Beyond Bias, Binary, and Border: Mapping out the Future of Comparative Rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 43, 3, 209--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Comparative study of networked communities, crisis communication, and technology: rhetoric of disaster in Nepal earthquake and hurricane Maria

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SIGDOC '19: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
          October 2019
          308 pages
          ISBN:9781450367905
          DOI:10.1145/3328020

          Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 October 2019

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • extended-abstract

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGDOC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate85of105submissions,81%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader