ABSTRACT
Today's global digital climate is characterized by a variety of UX communities that are emerging online for the first time. While many technology companies have developed design systems and practices to address the needs of global users, there is a noticeable gap in understanding of global UX in technical communication and even in UX education. The purpose of such experience report is to outline a framework for establishing a shared understanding of global UX. The framework relies on inclusive design as a guiding philosophy and is based on my experience developing and teaching a global UX course in an undergraduate UX program. This paper briefly outlines the purpose and key topics of a global UX course at [school name omitted intentionally]. The paper concludes with a call for UX educators to engage with the topic of global UX through curriculum development and research.
- Lee Okan. 2018. UX education: The rise of educational programs. User Experience Magazine 18(5), http://uxpamagazine.org/ux-education-2/.Google Scholar
- Yubo Kou and Colin M. Gray. 2019. A practice-led account of the conceptual evolution of UX knowledge. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. May 4--9, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linn Vizard. 2016. The evolution of UX education. Adobe Blog, December 19, 2016, https://theblog.adobe.com/the-evolution-of-ux-education/.Google Scholar
- Alberto Ferreira. 2017. Universal UX Design: Building Multicultural User Experience. Elsevier: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Robert Schumacher. 2010. Handbook of Global User Research. Morgan Kaufmann Press: Oakbrook Terrace, IL.Google Scholar
- Whitney Quesenbery and Daniel Szuc, 2012. Global UX: Design and Research in a Connected World. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Jan Brejcha, 2015. Cross-Cultural Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience Design: A Semiotic Perspective. CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Kirk St. Amant. 2017. The cultural context of care in international communication design: A heuristic for addressing usability in international health and medical communication. Communication Design Quarterly. 5 (2), 62--70.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tatiana Batova. 2018. Global technical communication in 7.5 weeks online: Combining industry and academic perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 61 (3), 311--329.Google Scholar
- Josephine Walwema. 2018. Transliteracies in Intercultural Professional Communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 6 (3), 330--345.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Microsof. n.d. Inclusive Design Toolkit, https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/.Google Scholar
- Google. 2018. Designing for global accessibility, Part I-III. UX for the Next Billion of Users, https://design.google/library/ux-next-billion-users/Google Scholar
- Luciano Floridi (Ed.). 2015. The Online Manifesto: Being Human in an Interconnected Era. Springer. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Center for Human Technology. 2019. https://humanetech.com/.Google Scholar
- Professional Association of Design. nd. Diversity and inclusion initiative. https://www.aiga.org/diversity-and-inclusion-initiative.Google Scholar
- Design for Social Good. 2019. Can good design change the world? https://designforsocialgood.org/.Google Scholar
- Harvard Project Zero. 2018. Digital Civics Toolkit. http://www.pz.harvard.edu/resources/digital-civics-toolkit.Google Scholar
- Open Lab at Newcastle University. 2019. Digital Civics. https://digitalcivics.io/Google Scholar
- Emma J. Rose. 2016. Design as advocacy: Using a human- centered approach to investigate the needs of vulnerable populations. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 46(4), 427--445.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cynthia Putnam, Maria Dahman, Emma J. Rose, Jinghui Cheng, Glee Bradford. 2016. Best practices for teaching accessibility in university classrooms: Cultivating awareness, understanding, and appreciation for diverse users. In ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 8 (4), 13:1-13:26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rose, Emma & Edenfield, Avery & Walton, Rebecca & Gonzales, Laura & Shivers McNair, Ann & Zhvotovska, Tetyana & Jones, Natasha & I. Garcia de Mueller, Genevieve & Moore, Kristen. 2018. Social Justice in UX: Centering Marginalized Users. 1--2. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Josephine Miller. 2018. How to design for social change. Medium, https://medium.com/nyc-design/how-to-design-for-social-change-571a18e70bf5.Google Scholar
- Web Accessibility Initiative. 2016. Making the Web Accessible, https://www.w3.org/WAI/.Google Scholar
- IBM. n.d. IBM Accessibility Handbook, http://accessibility-handbook.mybluemix.net/design/a11y-handbook/.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. n.d. Inclusive Design Toolkit, https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/.Google Scholar
- Google. 2018. Designing for global accessibility, Part I-III. UX for the Next Billion of Users, https://design.google/library/ux-next-billion-users/.Google Scholar
- Samsung Design. 2019. Right to Access, http://design.samsung.com/global/contents/accessibility/.Google Scholar
- Institute for Human-Centered Design. n.d. Inclusive Design: History, https://www.w3.org/WAI/.Google Scholar
- Roger Coleman, John Clarkson, Hua Dong, and Julia Cassim (eds). 2007. Design for Inclusivity: A Practical Guide to Accessible, Innovative and User-Centered Design. Lancaster University, UK.Google Scholar
- Laura Calbag. 2017. Accessibility of everyone. A Book Apart. New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Nithya Sambasivan and Jess Holbrook. 2019. Towards Responsible AI for the Next Billion Users. Interactions, 68--71.Google Scholar
- Google. 2018. Designing for global accessibility, Part I-III. UX for the Next Billion of Users, https://design.google/library/ux-next-billion-users/Google Scholar
- Google Developer. 2017. Designing Great Apps for New Internet Users. Global UX Speaker Series, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fo-1qrHeQXQGoogle Scholar
- Google. n.d. The Making of YouTube Go. https://design.google/library/making-youtube-go/.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. n.d. Inclusive Design Toolkit, https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/.Google Scholar
- Facebook Design. 2019. Diverse Device Hands. https://facebook.design/handskit.html.Google Scholar
- Apple. 2018. Apple brings more than 70 new emoji to iPhone with iOS 12.1. Newsroom, https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/10.Google Scholar
- Google. n.d. Material Design, https://material.io/design/.Google Scholar
- Adobe XD. n.d. Adobe Design systems from the inside out, https://www.adobe.com/products/xd/design-systems/design-systems-what-how-why.html.Google Scholar
- Anna Cavender, Shari Trewin, and Vicki Hanson. 2015. Accessible writing guide. ACM Interactions 22 (6), 62--65.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Google. n.d. Material Design WritingGoogle Scholar
- https://material.io/design/communication/writing.html.Google Scholar
- Hans Persson, Henrik Åhman, Alexander Arvei Yngling, Jan Gulliksen. 2015. Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts-one goal? On the concept of accessibility-historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Journal of Universal Access in the Information Society. 14 (4), 505--526.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Microsof. n.d. Inclusive Design Toolkit, https://www.microsoft.com/design/inclusive/.Google Scholar
- World Economic Forum (2018). The Future of Jobs. http://reports.weforum.org/future-of-jobs-2018/.Google Scholar
- Nithya Sambasivan. 2019. The remarkable illusions of technology for social good. ACM Interactions 26 (3), 64--67.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max Krüger, Ana Bustamante Duarte, Anne Weibert, Konstantin Aal, Reem Talhouk, and Oussama Metatla. 2019. What is participation? Emerging challenges for participatory design in globalized conditions. ACM Interactions. 26 (3), 50--54.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Kiess. 2019. Building an ethics framework for UX design. User Experience Magazine 18 (5), from http://uxpamagazine.org/building-an-ethics-framework-for-ux-design/.Google Scholar
- Tatiana Batova. 2018. Global technical communication in 7.5 weeks online: Combining industry and academic perspectives. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. 61 (3), 311--329.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Beyond cultural dimensions: digital inclusion in global UX
Recommendations
Evaluation of interactive puppet theater based on inclusive design methods: a case study of students at elementary school for the deaf
IDC '13: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenIn this study, evaluation experiment was conducted on an interactive puppet theater, a puppetry system designed for deaf children to enhance their enjoyment of performances. An interactive puppet theater has two features: a feature that ensures the ...
The accessibility of television news with live subtitling on digital television
EuroITV '10: Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Interactive TV and VideoThis paper focuses on live subtitles for the deaf and hard of hearing. DR conducted an exploratory study on live subtitles used in conjunction with the main news on DR1 to establish whether there were significant accessibility issues. A sample of 27 ...
Evaluation of the puppet theater based on inclusive design method: a case study of fourth-year elementary school students with normal hearing
IDC '12: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and ChildrenIn this study, we examined the feature of the audience participation in the progress of the story in Puppet Theater. Puppet Theater is a puppet show system developed that is designed for appreciation by hearing-impaired children. Wada et al. (2012) ...
Comments