skip to main content
10.1145/3328020.3353935acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Disaster documentation: the impact of Oregon's evolving damage assessment methodology for emergency declarations

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This experience report focuses on the impact of Oregon's evolving methodology for documenting and publishing data and information about damage from natural disasters and other emergencies. In tracing public damage assessment genre sets through organizational levels and user groups, the report (a) outlines the current processes by which data and information are generated and transferred and (b) connects the potential future damage assessment methodology to a larger paradigm shift in the state's broader data-sharing approach.

References

  1. M. J.; Bawarshi, A.; Reiff and A. Devitt. 2018. Writing Scenes: Strategies for Composing with Genres. Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. I. Chivite. 2017. Using FEMA's Survey123 Preliminary Damage Assessment Templates. https://community.esri.com/groups/survey123/blog/2018/09/11/using-fema-s-survey123-preliminary-damage-assessment-templatesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. FEMA. 2016. Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended, and Related Authorities as of August 2016. https://www.fema.gov/media-library/assets/documents/15271Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. FEMA. 2018. Preliminary Damage Assessment Reports. https://www.fema.gov/preliminary-damage-assessment-reportsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. FEMA. 2019. Disasters. https://www.fema.gov/disastersGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. FEMA. 2019. Per Capita Impact Indicator and Project Thresholds. https://www.fema.gov/public-assistance-indicator-and-project-thresholdsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. J. J. Garrett. 2011. The Elements of User Experience (2nd ed.). New Riders.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. C.(trans.) Latour, B.; Porter. 1996. Aramis: or, the Love of Technology. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Oregon State Legislature. 2017. Public body duty to share geospatial framework data with council; conditions and exceptions; methods for sharing; limitations of liability. https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors276A.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Low. 2019. The natural disasters of 2018 in figures: Losses in 2018 dominated by wildfires and tropical storms. Munich Reinsurance Company (January 2019). https://www.munichre.com/topics-online/en/climate-change-and-natural-disasters/natural-disasters/the-natural-disasters-of-2018-in-figures.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Oregon Emergency Management. 2019. Damage Assessment Forms, Templates and Resources. https://www.oregon.gov/oem/emresources/disasterassist/Pages/Damage-Assessment.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Oregon Emergency Management. 2019. Disaster Assistance for Individuals, Families and Businesses. https://www.oregon.gov/oem/emresources/disasterassist/Pages/Individual-Assistance.aspxGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oregon Emergency Management. 2019. Local and Tribal Emergency Managers. https://www.oregon.gov/oem/Documents/locals_list.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Oregon Geographic Enterprise Office. 2018. Joint Hazards / Preparedness FIT. ftp://ftp.gis.oregon.gov/MINUTES/FIT/TEAMS/PREPAREDNESS/_PREPAREDNESS/2018/2018.12.04.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Potts. 2008. Diagramming with Actor Network Theory: A Method for Modeling Holistic Experience. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (July 2008). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. B. Sauer. 2003. The Rhetoric of Risk: Technical Documentation in Hazardous Environments. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. K. Schulz. 2015. The Really Big One: An earthquake will destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest. The question is when. New Yorker (July 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Congressional Research Service. 2017. Preliminary Damage Assessments for Major Disasters: Overview, Analysis, and Policy Observations. (2017), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Spinuzzi. 2003. Tracing Genres Through Organizations: A Sociocultural Approach to Information Design. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Spinuzzi. 2008. Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Disaster documentation: the impact of Oregon's evolving damage assessment methodology for emergency declarations

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SIGDOC '19: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
          October 2019
          308 pages
          ISBN:9781450367905
          DOI:10.1145/3328020

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 October 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper

          Acceptance Rates

          SIGDOC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate85of105submissions,81%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader