ABSTRACT
Prototype-driven design research often involves collecting and analyzing designed artifacts in annotated portfolios and design workbooks. These collections constitute important sources of intellectual influence for researchers, yet communicating this influence presents unique challenges, such as the difficulty of translating the aesthetic, material, or interactive qualities of a designed artifact into written text. Building on discourses of visual thinking and visual imagery in science communication and HCI research, this paper introduces, and elaborates, a novel research communication design concept called "visual references," which combine bibliographic information with photographic images, textual annotations, and diagrammatic annotations in order to communicate design-related intellectual influence.
- [n.d] Zotero | Your personal research assistant. http://www.zotero.org/Google Scholar
- Daren Arsenault, Laurence D. Smith, and Edith A. Beauchamp. 2006. Visual inscriptions in the scientific hierarchy. Science Communication 27, 3 (2006), 376--428.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eli Blevis. 2011. Digital imagery as meaning and form in HCI and design. interactions 18, 5 (sep 2011), 60. http://doi.org/10/1145/2008176.2008190Google Scholar
- Eli Blevis. 2014. Stillness and motion, meaning and form. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eli Blevis, Elizabeth Churchill, William Odom, James Pierce, David Roedl, and Ron Wakkary. 2012. Visual thinking and digital imagery. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts - CHI EA '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2715--2718. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eli Blevis, Sabrina Hauser, and William Odom. 2015. Sharing the hidden treasure in pictorials. interactions 22, 3 (Apr. 2015) 32--43. Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Bowers. 2012. The logic of annotated portfolios. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hans-Jurgen Bucher and Philipp Niemann. 2012. Visualizing science: The reception of powerpoint presentations. Visual Communication 11, 3(2012), 283--306. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Audrey Desjardins, Ron Wakkary, and William Odom. 2016. Behind the lens. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '16. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 360--376. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tom Djajadiningrat, Stephan Wensveen, Joep Frens, and Kees Overbeeke. 2004. Tangible products: Redressing the balance between appearance and action. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 8, 5 (Sept 2004), 294--309. Google ScholarDigital Library
- YJ Doran. 2019. Building knowledge through images in physics. Visual Communication 18, 2(2019), 251--277. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elsevier. 2019. Graphical abstracts. https://www.elsevier.com/authors/journal-authors/graphical-abstractGoogle Scholar
- Fabiola Cristina Rodriguez Estrada and Lloyd Spencer Davis. 2015. Improving visual communication of science through the incorporation of graphic design theories and practice into science communication. Science Communication 37, 1 (2015), 140--148. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel Fallman. 2003. Design-oriented human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '03. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 225--232. Google ScholarDigital Library
- William Gaver. 2011. Making spaces: How design workbooks work. In Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '11. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1551--1560. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ronald N. Giere. 1999. Visual models and scientific judgment. In Science without laws. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
- Lars-Erik Janlert and Erik Stolterman. 2018. Things that keep us busy: The elements of interaction, The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Ilpo Koskinen, John Zimmerman, Thomas Binder, Johan Redström, and Stephan Wensveen (1st ed.). 2011. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. 5--29. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruno Latour. 1990. Drawing things together. In Representation in Scientific Practice, Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar (Eds.). The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. 19--68Google Scholar
- Louise Ravelli, Brian Paltridge, Sue Starfield, and Kathryn Tuckwell. 2013. Extending the notion of text: The visual and performing arts doctoral thesis. Visual Communication 12, 4 (2013), 395--422. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mark Roxburgh. 2010. Design and the aesthetics of research. Visual Communication 9, 4 (2010), 425--439. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean Trumbo. 1999. Visual literacy and science communication. Science Communication 20, 4 (1999), 409--425. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean Trumbo. 2000. Seeing science: Research opportunities in the visual communication of science. Science Communication 21, 4 (2000), 379--391. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anthony F.C. Wallace. 1978. Rockdale: The growth of an American village in the early industrial revolution. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
- Mikael Wiberg and Erik Stolterman. 2014. What makes a prototype novel?: A knowledge contribution concern for interaction design research. In Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational (NordiCHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 531--540. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Zimmerman, Jodi Forlizzi, and Shelley Evenson. 2007. Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '07. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 493--502. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Zimmerman, Erik Stolterman, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. An analysis and critique of research through design. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS '10. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 310--319. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Communicating design-related intellectual influence: towards visual references
Recommendations
Communicating science and technology visually
ISDOC '14: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of CommunicationData visuals are everywhere, from the most trite like bar charts to the most complex like network graphs, and computer animations and simulations. While the diversity and abundance of data visuals is clearly a result of our technological revolution, ...
The art of the interface: visual ideas, principles and inspiration for interface designers
CHI '98: CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThree-Dimensional Representation in Visual Communication of Science
Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience in Advanced Technological EnvironmentsAbstractTechnology has been used to communicate complex information and brought opportunities for science development and science communication. Three-dimensional representation systems allow design to use image and video in innovative ways and enable ...
Comments