skip to main content
10.1145/3328020.3353953acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Using content analysis to explore users' perceptions and experiences using a novel citizen first responder app

Published:04 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Our experience report describes a pilot project that investigates users' self-reported perceptions and experiences using PulsePoint---a novel citizen first responder app. Our study includes analyzing select reviewer comments posted on the iOS and Android platforms and using grounded theory distillation practices to develop an evaluative heuristic/framework. We argue that these comments provide a rich source of untapped data for understanding how users experience mHealth apps from users' perspectives. We propose that the preliminary findings from this study can be used to inform the development and design of mHealth apps in the future from a patient/user-centered perspective, especially those that rely on citizen first responders.

References

  1. Sagar Goyal and Joseph A. Cafazzo. 2013. Medical phone health apps for diabetes management: current evidenc and future developments. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 106, 12 (October 2013), 1067--1069 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Mark S. Smolinski, Adam W. Crawley, Kristin Baltrusaitis, Rumi Chunara, Jennifer M. Olsen, Oktawia Wójcik, ... and John S. Brownstein. 2015. Flu near you: Crowdsourced symptom reporting spanning 2 influenza seasons. American Journal of Public Health 105, 10 (March 2015), 2124--2130. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Candice A. Welhausen. 2017. At your own risk: User-contributed flu maps, participatory surveillance, and an emergent DIY risk assessment ethic. Communication Design Quarterly 5, 2 (July 2017), 51--61. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sudden Cardiac Arrest Foundation. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.scaaware.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Carolina Malta Hansen, Kristian Kragholm, David A. Pearson, Clark Tyson, Lisa Monk, Brent Myers, ... and Christopher B. Granger. 2015. Association of bystander and first-responder intervention with survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in North Carolina, 2010--2013. JAMA 314, 3 (July 2015), 255--264. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maddalena Fiordelli, Nicola Diviani, and Peter J. Schulz. 2013. Mapping mHealth research: A decade of evolution. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, 5 (1013). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Arul Chib and Sapphire H. Lin. 2018. Theoretical advancements in mHealth: A systematic review of mobile apps. Journal of Health Communication 23, 10--11 (Nov. 2018), 909--955. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Matthew Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Ben Richardson, Britt Klein, Helen Skouteris, Helen Christensen, David Austin, ... and Anna Ware. 2018. A mobile app-based intervention for depression: End-user and expert usability testing study. JMIR Mental Health 5, 3 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Danielle E. Jake-Schoffman, Valerie J. Silfee, Molly E. Waring, Edwin D. Boudreaux, Rajani S. Sadasivam, Sean P. Mullen, ... and Sherry L. Pagoto. 2017. Methods for evaluating the content, usability, and efficacy of commercial mobile health apps. JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth 5, 12 (2017). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fiona H. McKay, Christina Cheng, Annemarie Wright, Jane Shill, Hugh Stephens, and Mary Uccellini. 2016. Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 24, 1 (Oct. 2016), 22--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chiwon Ahn, Yongtak Cho, Jaehoon Oh, Yeongtak Song, Tae Ho Lim, Hyunggoo Kang, and Juncheol Lee. 2016. Evaluation of smartphone applications for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in South Korea. BioMed Research International. Retrieved from https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/6418710/abs/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Tomohiko Sakai, Tetsuhisa Kitamura, Chika Nishiyama, Yukiko Murakami, Masahiko Ando, Takashi Kawamura, ... and Taku Iwami. 2015. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation support application on a smartphone-randomized controlled trial. Circulation Journal 79, 5 (2015), 1052--1057. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Marco Kalz, Niklas Lenssen, Marc Felzen, Rolf Rossaint, Bernardo Tabuenca, Marcus Specht, and Max Skorning. 2014. Smartphone apps for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training and real incident support: A mixed-methods evaluation study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16, 3 (2014). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Steven C. Brooks, Graydon Simmons, Heather Worthington, Bentley J. Bobrow, and Laurie J. Morrison. 2016. The PulsePoint Respond mobile device application to crowdsource basic life support for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Challenges for optimal implementation. Resuscitation, 98, (Jan. 2016), 20--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Steven C. Brooks, Heather Worthington, T. Gonedalles, Bentley Bobrow, and Laurie J. Morrison. 2014. Implementation of the PulsePoint smartphone application for crowd-sourcing bystander resuscitation. Critical Care 18, 1 (March 2014), 484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Effie Lai-Chong Law, Virpi Roto, Marc Hassenzahl, Arnold P.O.S. Vermeeren, and Joke Kort. 2009. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, 719--728. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Institute of Medicine. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Frydman. 2010. A Patient-Centric Definition of Participatory Medicine. Society for Participatory Medicine. Retrieved from https://participatorymedicine.org/epatients/2010/04/a-patient-centric-definition-of-participatory-medicine.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Lora Arduser. 2017. Living Chronic: Agency and Expertise in the Rhetoric of Diabetes. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Artur Direito, Leila Pfaeffli Dale, Emma Shields, Rosie Dobson, Robyn Whittaker, and Ralph Maddison. 2014. Do physical activity and dietary smartphone applications incorporate evidence-based behaviour change techniques?. BMC Public Health 14, 1 (Feb. 2014), 646. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Anouk Middelweerd, Julia S. Mollee, C. Natalie van der Wal, Johannes Brug, and Saskia J. te Velde. 2014. Apps to promote physical activity among adults: A review and content analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 11, 1 (2014), 97. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. 1999. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pulse Point. 2019. Retrieved from www.pulsepoint.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Pulse Point. 2019. Retrieved from https://www.pulsepoint.org/pulsepoint-respond/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Apple Store Preview. PulsePoint Respond. 2019. Retrieved from https://apps.apple.com/us/app/pulsepoint-respond/id500772134Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Katie N. Dainty, Haris Vaid, and Steven C. Brooks. 2017. North American public opinion survey on the acceptability of crowdsourcing basic life support for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with the PulsePoint mobile phone app. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 5, 5 (2017). DOI:http://dx.doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Using content analysis to explore users' perceptions and experiences using a novel citizen first responder app

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SIGDOC '19: Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication
        October 2019
        308 pages
        ISBN:9781450367905
        DOI:10.1145/3328020

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 October 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGDOC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate85of105submissions,81%Overall Acceptance Rate355of582submissions,61%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader