W. Michele Simmons
ABSTRACT
This article investigates tensions and challenges with enacting community-engaged research (CER) in the fields of communication design, technical communication, and community literacy. Drawing from interviews with 13 participants, we constructed a heuristic that identifies six tensions community-engaged researchers (CERs) often negotiate through their research stance: (1) embodiment and identity, (2) access and relationships, (3) interventions and actions, (4) institutions and disciplinarity, (5) intentions and outcomes, and (6) disclosure and write-up. CERs described the tensions as concurrent, noting that shifting commitments, liminality, and time were factors that span categories. These findings underscore the necessity of opening spaces in disciplinary and institutional contexts to value and recognize intellectual work associated with CER such as trust building, boundary negotiation, methodological construction, and relationship maintenance.
- Timothy R. Amidon and W. Michele Simmons. 2016. Negotiating 'Messy' Research Context and Design Through Adaptive Research Stances: Experience Report. In SIGDOC '16: Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (SIGDOC '16), Sarah Gunning (Ed.). ACM, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1--6. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Timothy R. Amidon, Elizabeth A. Williams, Tiffany Lipsey, Randy Callahan, Gary Nuckols, and Spencer Rice. 2017. Sensors and gizmos and data, oh my: informating frefighters' personal protective equipment. Communication Design Quarterly 5, 4 (2017), 15--30. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elizabeth L. Angeli. 2019. Rhetorical Work in Emergency Medical Serivces: Communicating in the Unpredictable Workplace. Routledge, New York, NY. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth L. Angeli and Christina D. Norwood. 2017. Responding to Public Health Crises: Bridging Collective Mindfulness and User Experience to Create Communication Interventions. Communication Design Quarterly 5, 2 (2017), 29--39. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jane Bennett. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristin M. Bivens. 2018. Rhetorically Listening for Microwithdrawals of Consent in Research Practice. In Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, Lisa Melocon and J. Blake Scott (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, 138--156.Google Scholar
- Rachel Bloom-Pojar. 2018. Translingual Rhetorical Engagement in Transcultural Health Spaces. In Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, Lisa Melocon and J. Blake Scott (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, 214--233.Google Scholar
- Stuart Blythe, Jeffrey T. Grabill, and Kirk Riley. 2008. Action research and wicked environmental problems: Exploring appropriate roles for researchers in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 22, 3 (2008), 272--298.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristie S. Fleckenstein, Clay Spinuzzi, Rebecca J. Rickly, and Clark Papper. 2008. The importance of harmony: An ecological metaphor for research writing. College Composition and Communication 60, 2 (2008), 388--419.Google Scholar
- Erin A. Frost. 2008. Transcultural Risk Communication on Dauphin Island: An Analysis of Ironically Located Responses to the Deepwater Horizon Disaster. Technical Communication Quarterly 22, 1 (2008), 50--66.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erin A. Frost and Angela M. Haas. 2017. Seeing and Knowing the Womb: A Technofeminist Reframing of Fetal Ultrasound toward a Decolonization of Our Bodies. Computers and Composition 43 (2017), 88--105.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura Gonzales. 2018. Translation as Technology: From Linguistic 'Deficit' to Rhetorical Strength. In Racial Shorthand: Coded Discrimination Contested in Social Media, Cruz Medina and Octavio Pimentel (Eds.). Computers and Composition Digital Press/University Press of Colorado/Utah State University Press, Louisville, CO. https://ccdigitalpress.org/book/shorthand/chapter_gonzales.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Jeffrey T. Grabill. 2006. The Study of Writing in the Social Factory: Methodology and Rhetorical Agency. In Critical Power Tools: Technical Communication and Cultural Studies, Bernadette Longo J. Blake Scott and Katherine V. Wills (Eds.). State University of New York, Albany, NY, 151--170.Google Scholar
- Jeffrey T. Grabill. 2012. Community-based research and the importance of a researcher stance. In Writing Studies Research in Practice, Lee Nickoson and Mary P. Sheridan (Eds.). S. Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 210--219.Google Scholar
- Angela M. Haas and Michelle F. Eble. 2018. Introduction: The Social Justice Turn. In Key Theoretical Frameworks: Teaching Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century, Angela M. Haas and Michelle F. Eble (Eds.). Utah State University Press / University Press of Colorado, Louisville, CO, 3--22. Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Law. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. Routledge, New York, NY.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian McNely, Clay Spinuzzi, and Christa Teston. 2015. Contemporary Research Methodologies in Technical Communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 24, 1 (2015), 1--13. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisa Meloncon and J. Blake Scott. 2018. Manifesting Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine. In Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, Lisa Melocon and J. Blake Scott (Eds.). Routledge, New York, NY, 1--23.Google Scholar
- Cathryn Molloy. 2019. Durable, Portable Research Partnerships with Interdisciplinary Advocacy Groups, Specific Research Topics, and Larger Data Sets. Technical Communication Quarterly 28, 2 (2019), 1--13. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristen R. Moore, Natasha Jones, Bailey S. Cundiff, and Leah Heilig. 2017. Contested sites of health risks: using wearable technologies to intervene in racial oppression. Communication Design Quarterly 5, 4 (2017), 52--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dawn S. Opel. 2018. Ethical Research in 'Health 2.0': Considerations for Scholars of Medical Rhetoric. In Methodologies for the Rhetoric of Health and Medicine, Lisa Melocon and J. Blake Scott (Eds.). New York, NY, 176--194.Google Scholar
- Liza Potts. 2009. Using Actor Network Theory to Trace and Improve Multimodal Communication Design. Technical Communication Quarterly 18, 3 (2009), 281--301. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liza Potts. 2014. Social Media in Disaster Response: How Experience Architects Can Build for Participation. Routledge, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Liza Potts and Dave Jones. 2011. Contextualizing experiences: Tracing the relationships between people and technologies in the social web. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 25, 3 (2011), 338--358.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rebecca Rickly. 2007. Messy Contexts. In Research as Rhetorical Situation, Heida A. McKee and Danielle Nicole DeVoss (Eds.). Hampton Press, Cresskill, NJ, 377--397.Google Scholar
- Emma Rose and Josh Tenenberg. 2016. Arguing about design: A taxonomy of rhetorical strategies deployed by user experience practitioners. In SIGDOC '16: Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication (SIGDOC '16), Sarah Gunning (Ed.). ACM, Silver Spring, Maryland, 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donnie Johnson Sackey. 2018. An Environmental Justice Paradigm for Technical Communication. In Key Theoretical Frameworks: Teaching Technical Communication in the Twenty-First Century, Angela M. Haas and Michelle F. Eble (Eds.). Utah State University Press/ University Press of Colorado, Louisville, CO, 138--162. Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Blake Scott. 2003. Risky Rhetoric: AIDS and the Cultural Practices of HIV Testing. S. Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL.Google Scholar
- J. Blake Scott and Bernadette Longo. 2006. Introduction: Making the Cultural Turn. Technical Communication Quarterly 15, 1 (2006), 3--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Blake Scott, Bernadette Longo, and Katherine V. Wills. 2006. Critical Power Tools: Technical Communication and Cultural Studies. State University of New York, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
- Rebecca Walton, Maggie Zraly, and Jean Pierre Mugengana. 2015. Values and Validity: Navigating Messiness in a Community-Based Research Project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly 24, 1 (2015), 45--69. Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Negotiating research stance: an ecology of tensions in the design and practice of community-engaged research
Recommendations
Negotiating "Messy" Research Context and Design Through Adaptive Research Stances: Experience Report
SIGDOC '16: Proceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on the Design of CommunicationResearchers in communication design increasingly find themselves conducting research in their own communities. Following posthuman and critical methodologies which suggest that research sites are often shifting and messy, this experience report argues ...
The contested ontology of affordances
Ontological debates on affordances hinder research on technological affordances.Theories and conceptualizations of (technical) affordances have evolved over time.ANT-informed research allows a richer understanding of technological affordances. ...
"Why Don't You Just Adopt?": A Theoretical Exploration of the Dynamics of Everyday Appropriation and its Implications for Product Design
This article introduces two theoretical perspectives on users' creative appropriations of new products which underline that product adoption goes beyond the moment of buying a product. It points out that successful and sustainable product adoption ...
Comments