skip to main content
10.1145/3328243.3328257acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiuxidConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Identification of Usability Impact of Mobile Learning STEM in a Local University Context

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Despite the rapid progress of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) subjects in developed countries, in Malaysia, STEM is still lagging. Malaysia also lacks the local digital content for STEM, including mobile learning. Furthermore, from previous studies, the Human Computer Interaction (HCI) of local cultural aspects has been overlooked, which is unfortunate, as they can contribute to better usability design of the mobile devices and their apps. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the insights of the impact of the usability factors in terms of the general usability and culturally appropriate design factors of mobile devices, such as smart phones. The methodology deployed is largely qualitative with focus group discussions with respondents from a local university. The findings highlight insights, such as general usability and the culturally appropriate design of smart phones. This study can be of benefit as it provides insights concerning the usability impact factors for the local context.

References

  1. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin. 2018. Towards a Smart Educational Environment Framework for mLearning in a Malaysian context. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia, CHIuXiD '18 (CHIuXiD '18), Yohannes Kurniawan, Eunice Sari, and Josh Adi Tedjasaputra (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 74--81. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin, Maizatul Hayati Mohamad Yatim, Syamsul Bahrin Zaibon, Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali, Abu Bakar Ibrahim, Salman Firdaus Sidek, and Fadhil Harfiez Abdul Muttalib, and Mohd Fadhil Harfiez Mutalib. 2018. An Investigation of Student Experience of STEM Mobile Learning in a Local Malaysian University. In D. Parsons, R. Power, A. Palalas, H. Hambrock & K. MacCallum (Eds.), In Proceedings of 17th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning (pp. 36--50). Concordia University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Retrieved November 23, 2018 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/184921/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin. 2017. Needs and Potentials for Studying Local Malaysian Culture through Mobile Learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction and User Experience in Indonesia (pp. 60--66). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin and Laurel Evelyn Dyson. 2015. Culturally Appropriate Design of Mobile Learning Applications in the Malaysian Context. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cross-Cultural Design (pp. 3--14). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin. 2014. The Contribution of mLearning to the Study of Local Culture in the Malaysian University Context, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Shamsul Arrieya Ariffin, Laurel Evelyn Dyson, and Darlene Hoskins-McKenzie. 2012. Content is King: Malaysian Industry Experts' Point of View on Local Content for Mobile Phones. Journal of Mobile Technologies, Knowledge & Society 2012, 1: 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Carl Auerbach and Louise Silverstein. 2003. Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis, New York University Press, New York and London.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernama 2010. Telcos should have more cultural content: Rais, Star Publication (M) Bhd, Malaysia. Retrieved January 1, 2017, from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2010/01/19/telcos-should-have-more-cultural-content-rais/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 2: 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Boreum Choi, Inseong Lee, Jinwoo Kim, and Yunsuk Jeon. 2005. A qualitative cross-national study of cultural influences on mobile data service design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 661--670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Michael David Myers, & David Avison. 2002. An introduction to qualitative research in information systems. SAGE Publications Ltd. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Donald McMillan, Moira McGregor, and Barry Brown. 2015. From in the wild to in vivo: Video Analysis of Mobile Device Use. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 494--503. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Laurel Evelyn Dyson. 2012. Student-generated mobile learning: A shift in the educational paradigm for the 21st century. anzMLearn Transactions on Mobile Learning 1, 1: 5-19Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Naveenta Gupta, Sonia Garg and Khushdeep Arora. 2016. Pattern of mobile phone usage and its effects on psychological health, sleep, and academic performance in students of a medical university. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy & Pharmacology 6, 2: 132--139.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Supyan Hussin, Mohd Radzi Manap, Zaini Amir, and Pramela Krish. 2012. Mobile learning readiness among Malaysian students at higher learning institutes. Asian Social Science 8, 12: 276--283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Timo Jokela, Jussi Koivumaa, Jani Pirkola, Petri Salminen, and Niina Kantola. 2006. Methods for quantitative usability requirements: a case study on the development of the user interface of a mobile phone. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 10, 6 (September 2006), 345--355. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. David Kolb. 1984. Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development, Prentice Hall, New Jersey USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Agnes Kukulska-Hulme and John Traxler. 2007. Designing for mobile and wireless learning. Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning, 180--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, John Traxler, and John Pettit. 2007. Designed and user-generated activity in the mobile age. Journal of Learning Design 2, 1: 52--65Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Agnes Kukulska-Hulme. 2008. Human factors and innovation with mobile devices. In Handbook of research on digital information technologies: innovations, methods, and ethical issues (pp. 392--403). IGI Global.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Lim Keng Yaik. 2005. Minister speech, TM Forum, Sheraton Imperial KL, Retrieved June 7, 2011 from http://www.tmforum.org/WhyAttend/2719/home.html?linkid=31446.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Norazah Nordin, Mohamed Amin Embi, Helmi Norman, and Ebrahim Panah. 2017. A Historical Review of Mobile Learning Research in Malaysia and Its Implications for Malaysia and the Asia-Pacific Region. In Mobile Learning in Higher Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 137--150). Springer, Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jakob Nielsen (Ed.). 1990. Designing User Interfaces for International Use. Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd., Essex, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Marc Prensky. 2005. What can you learn from a cell phone? Almost anything. Innovate: Journal of Online Education 1, 5:1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. RMK 11. 2016. Main Document of Malaysian Plan, Retrieved June 5, 2016 from http://rmk11.epu.gov.my/index.php/bm/muat-turun-dokumenGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Everett Rogers. 2003. Diffusion of innovations, Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnny Saldaña, J. 2009. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. David Silverman. 2013. Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: SAGE Publications Limited.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Hyo-Jeong So. 2012. Turning on mobile learning in Asia: Illustrative initiatives and policy implications. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning, UNESCO, Paris. Retrieved January 1, 2017 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002162/216283E.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. John-Harmen Valk, Ahmed T. Rashid, and Laurent Elder. 2010. Using mobile phones to improve educational outcomes: An analysis of evidence from Asia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11, 1: 117--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Benjamin Xie, Isra Shabir, and Hal Abelson. 2015. Measuring the usability and capability of App inventor to create mobile Applications. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Programming for Mobile and Touch (PROMOTO 2015). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Patricia Young. 2008. Integrating culture in the design of ICTs. British Journal of Educational Technology 39, 1: 6--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Identification of Usability Impact of Mobile Learning STEM in a Local University Context

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CHIuXiD'19: Proceedings of the 5th International ACM In-Cooperation HCI and UX Conference
      April 2019
      205 pages
      ISBN:9781450361873
      DOI:10.1145/3328243

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 April 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate22of50submissions,44%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader