skip to main content
10.1145/3328526.3329621acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simplicity Creates Inequity: Implications for Fairness, Stereotypes, and Interpretability

Published:17 June 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Algorithms can be a powerful aid to decision-making - particularly when decisions rely, even implicitly, on predictions [7]. We are already seeing algorithms play this role in domains including hiring, education, lending, medicine, and criminal justice [2, 6, 10]. As is typical in machine learning applications, accuracy is an important measure for these tasks.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p807-kleinberg.mp4

mp4

1.5 GB

References

  1. Solon Barocas and Andrew Selbst. 2016. Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, Vol. 104 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Chouldechova, D. Prado, O. Fialko, and R. Vaithianathan. 2018. A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability Transparency (FAT*) .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sam Corbett-Davies and Sharad Goel. 2018. The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness. arxiv.org/1808.00023.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Finale Doshi-Velez and Been Kim. 2017. A Roadmap for a Rigorous Science of Interpretability. arxiv.org/1702.08608.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hanming Fang and Andrea Moro. 2011. Theories of statistical discrimination and affirmative action: A survey. In Handbook of social economics . Vol. 1. Elsevier, 133--200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Jon Kleinberg, Hima Lakkaraju, Jure Leskovec, Jens Ludwig, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2018. Human Decisions and Machine Predictions. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 133, 1 (2018), 237--293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jon Kleinberg, Jens Ludwig, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Ziad Obermeyer. 2015. Prediction policy problems. American Economic Review, Vol. 105, 5 (2015), 491--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Jon Kleinberg and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2018. Simplicity Creates Inequity: Implications for Fairness, Stereotypes, and Interpretability. arxiv.org/1809.04578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zachary C. Lipton. 2018. The mythos of model interpretability. Commun. ACM, Vol. 61, 10 (2018), 36--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jonah E. Rockoff, Brian A. Jacob, Thomas J. Kane, and Douglas O. Staiger. 2011. Can you recognize an effective teacher when you recruit one? Education Finance and Policy, Vol. 6, 1 (2011), 43--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Simplicity Creates Inequity: Implications for Fairness, Stereotypes, and Interpretability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      EC '19: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      June 2019
      947 pages
      ISBN:9781450367929
      DOI:10.1145/3328526

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 June 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      EC '19 Paper Acceptance Rate106of382submissions,28%Overall Acceptance Rate664of2,389submissions,28%

      Upcoming Conference

      EC '24
      The 25th ACM Conference on Economics and Computation
      July 8 - 11, 2024
      New Haven , CT , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader