skip to main content
10.1145/3328778.3366806acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Longitudinal View of Gender Balance in a Large Computer Science Program

Published:26 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Computer Science has a persistent lack of women's participation. In order to best effect change, we require a more fine-grain analysis of the gender disparity as it changes throughout an undergraduate Computer Science curriculum. In this paper, we use a quantitative approach to highlight, with greater specificity, the point in an undergraduate career where gender balance changes. We also examine the role of grades in students' decisions to stay in the course sequence. Our goal is to enable targeted interventions that will make Computer Science a more welcoming discipline. Our study examines 30,890 unique student records over ten years at a large, public research institution. The records include students who took a Computer Science course over the past ten years. The dataset contains information about gender, majors, minors, academic level, and GPA. The dataset also includes a record from each course taken by each student and their final grade. We observed a modest increase in women's participation in all Computer Science courses over the past ten years. Despite this increase, the gender disparity is still large. Through our analysis, we found that women consistently choose not to continue through the Computer Science sequence at a higher rate than men. This higher attrition could be linked to women receiving lower grades in most introductory CS courses despite having the same or higher GPAs than men. Our results reveal specific areas where intervention can be the most effective in changing the stubborn gender disparity in Computer Science.

References

  1. Lecia Barker, Charles Mcdowell, and Kimberly Kalahar. 2009. Exploring Factors that Influence Computer Science Introductory Course Students to Persist in the Major. ACM Sigcse Bulletin 41, 153--157. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508923Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. David Beede, Tiffany Julian, David Langdon, George McKittrick, Beethika Khan, and Mark Doms. 2011. Women in STEM: A Gender Gap to Innovation. Economics and Statistics Administration 4--11 (Aug 2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sylvia Beyer, Kristina Rynes, Julie Perrault, Kelly Hay, and Susan M. Haller. 2003. Gender differences in computer science students. ACM Sigcse Bulletin 35, 49--53. https://doi.org/10.1145/792548.611930Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Maureen Biggers, Anne Martinelli, and Tuba Yilmaz. 2008. Student perceptions of computer science: a retention study comparing graduating seniors with cs leavers. 402--406. https://doi.org/10.1145/1352135.1352274Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. McGrath. Cohoon and William Aspray. 2008. Just Get Over It or Just Get On With It? Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing. MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Linda J. Sax, Jennifer Blaney, Kathleen Lehman, Sarah Rodriguez, Kari George, and Christina Zavala. 2018. Sense of Belonging in Computing: The Role of Introductory Courses forWomen and Underrepresented Minority Students. Social Sciences 7 (07 2018), 122. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7080122Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Considerations for switching: exploring factors behind CS students' desire to leave a CS major. 290--295. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197091.3197113Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Understanding Professional Identities and Goals of Computer Science Undergraduate Students. 191--196. https://doi.org/10.1145/3159450.3159474Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Catherine Mavriplis, Rachelle Heller, Cheryl Beil, Kim Dam, Natalya Yassinskaya, Megan Shaw, and Charlene Sorensen. 2010. Mind the Gap: Women in STEM Career Breaks. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation 5, 1 (Apr 2010).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Iwona Miliszewska, Gayle Barker, Fiona Henderson, and Ewa Sztendur. 2006. The Issue of Gender Equity in Computer Science - What Students Say. Journal of Information Technology Education 5 (2006). https://doi.org/10.28945/2986Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stuart Zweben and Betsy Bizot. 2018. 2017 CRA Taulbee Survey. Computing Research Association (May 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A Longitudinal View of Gender Balance in a Large Computer Science Program

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
          February 2020
          1502 pages
          ISBN:9781450367936
          DOI:10.1145/3328778

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 February 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

          Upcoming Conference

          SIGCSE Virtual 2024

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader