skip to main content
10.1145/3328778.3366877acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Algebra I Before High School as a Gatekeeper to Computer Science Participation

Published:26 February 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

A complex web of factors can influence whether students participate in computer science (CS) during high school. In order to increase participation in CS for all students, we need to better understand who is currently participating and what factors might be hindering participation. This study utilized a large-scale, student-level dataset from the Texas Education Research Center to investigate factors that predict high school student participation in CS and advanced CS courses. Our dataset contained information on over 1.1 million Texas high school students from the 2017-2018 school year, allowing us visibility into CS course availability in schools, student course taking, and detailed demographic information. We used multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models to explore predictive factors of student participation in CS and advanced CS courses, limiting our analysis to students whose schools offered CS. In both models, our results showed that students who took Algebra I before high school had more than double the odds of being enrolled in a CS course. This work supports and extends previous understanding of factors that are predictive of CS participation in high school, contributing to the existing literature by uncovering the importance of Algebra I before high school as a potential gatekeeper to participation in CS.

References

  1. Clifford Adelman. 1999. Answers in the Tool Box. Academic Intensity, Attendance Patterns, and Bachelor's Degree Attainment. Report. National Institute on Postsecondary Education, Libraries, andLifelong Learning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Texas Education Agency. [n. d.]. Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills for Technology Applications, Subchapter C. http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/ chapter126/ch126c.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Christine Bailie and Amy Wiseman. 2018. Improving equity and driving degree completion through acceleration in mathematics. Report. E3 Alliance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. The College Board. 2018. Frequently Asked Questions AP Computer Science Principles: AP Central. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ ap-computer-science-principles/course/frequently-asked-questionsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. The College Board. 2019. AP Computer Science A Frequently Asked Questions: AP Central. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-computer-science-a/ course/frequently-asked-questionsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Code.org Advocacy Coalition and Computer Science Teachers Association. 2018. 2018 State of computer science education. Report. https://advocacy.code.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Code.org. 2017. Does Making CS "Count" Make a Difference? https://medium. com/@codeorg/does-making-cs-count-make-a-difference-7ab5ca6b8407Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Code.org. 2018. https://hourofcode.com/usGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gallup Inc. Google Inc. 2016. Computer Science Learning: Closing the Gap: Black Students. Findings from: Diversity Gaps in Computer Science: Exploring the Underrepresentation of Girls, Blacks and Hispanics. Technical Report. https: //goo.gl/FIhXKpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallup Inc. Google Inc. 2016. Trends in the State of Computer Science in U.S. K-12 Schools. Technical Report. http://goo.gl/j291E0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. E. M. Gordon and D. J. Heck. 2019. 2018 NSSME+: Status of high school computer science. Report. Horizon Research, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jason A. Grissom and Christopher Redding. 2016. Discretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open 2, 1 (2016), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Tom Loveless. 2013. The 2013 Brown Center Report on American Education: How well are American students learning Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jane Margolis. 2008. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Seymour Papert. 1980. Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. Basic Books, Inc., New York.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Frances R. Spielhagen. 2006. Closing the achievement gap in math: The Long- Term Effects of Eighth-Grade Algebra. Journal of Advanced Academics 18, 1 (2006), 34--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. JenniferWang and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2017. Diversity barriers in K12 computer science education: Structural and social. In SIGCSE Technical Symposium. 615--620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Zweben. 2011. Computing degree andenrollment trends. Report. Computing Research Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Algebra I Before High School as a Gatekeeper to Computer Science Participation
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCSE '20: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
        February 2020
        1502 pages
        ISBN:9781450367936
        DOI:10.1145/3328778

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 26 February 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

        Upcoming Conference

        SIGCSE Virtual 2024

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader