skip to main content
10.1145/3328833.3328858acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicsieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Portfolio Selection Factors: Egypt Equity Market Case Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 April 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Portfolio management provides portfolio managers with the appropriate models for professional management of funds. The primary objectives for portfolio managers are to maximize the expected return of their investments while minimizing the associated risk. These two objectives translate into different portfolio selection factors, and there is variety of models presented in the literature considering different combinations among such factors. In this study, we illustrate the main portfolio selection factors and conducted a survey filled by Egyptian asset managers to identify the necessary factors to be considered when investing in Egypt equity market. Based on the survey analysis, we concluded which factors to be considered, and which not to be considered when building multi-criteria portfolio management models for investing in Egypt equity market.

References

  1. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7, 77--91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferretti, A. P. (1970). Investment company portfolio management. Irwin Inc., 173--182.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lesser, K., Lobe, S., & Walkshäusl, C. (2014). Green and socially responsible investing in international markets. Journal of Asset Management, 15(5), 317--331.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Levy, H., & Sarnat, M. (1972). Investment performance in an imperfect securities market and the case for mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 77--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Lee, S. M., & Lerro, A. J. (1973). Optimizing the portfolio selection for mutual funds. Journal of Finance, 28(5), 1087--1101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zopounidis, C., Doumpos, M., & Zanakis, S. (1999). Stock evaluation using a preference disaggregation methodology. Decision Sciences, 30, 313--336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Pendaraki, K., Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2004). Towards a goal programming methodology for constructing equity mutual fund portfolios. Journal of Asset Management, 4(6), 415--428.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Sharpe, W. F. (1967). A linear programming algorithm for mutual funds portfolio selection. Management Science, 13(3), 499--510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yu JR, Lee WY (2011) Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria. European Journal of Operational Research 209(2), 166--175.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tuncer Şakar C., Köksalan M (2012) A stochastic programming approach to multicriteria portfolio optimization. Journal of Global Optimization, 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Xidonas, P., Mavrotas, G. & Psarras, Journal of Global Optimization (2010) 47: 185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Vaucher, B., & Medvedev, A. (2017). Efficient integration of risk premia exposures into equity portfolios. Journal of Asset Management, 18(7), 538--546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Ben Abdelaziz, F., El Fayedh, R., & Rao, A. (2009). A discrete stochastic goal program for portfolio selection: The case of United Arab Emirates equity market. Information Systems and Operational Research, 47, 5--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Brennan, M. J., Schwartz, E. S., & Lagnado, R. (1997). Strategic asset allocation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 21(8--9), 1377--1403.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Avramov, D. (2002). Stock return predictability and model uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(3), 423--458.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Cristo, V. G. (2015), The necessity to introduce the accounting rules and fair value in the conceptual framework. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 515--521.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Oppenheimer, Henry R. (1986). Ben Graham's Net Current Asset Values: A Performance Update. Financial Analysts Journal, 42(6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Lundholm, R., & O'keefe, T. (2001). Reconciling value estimates from the discounted cash flow model and the residual income model. Contemporary Accounting Research, 18(2), 311--335.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Amihud, Y., Mendelson, H., & Wood, R. (1990). Liquidity and the 1987 stock market crash. Journal of Portfolio Management, 16(3), 65--69.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. West, J.. Asia-Pac Financial Markets (2012) 19(1):1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Markowitz, H. M. (1959). Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. New York: Wiley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Mary, J. F., & Rathika, G. (2015). The single index model and the construction of optimal portfolio with cnxpharma scrip. International Journal of Management, 6(1), 87--96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Penrose, E., & Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Brush, T. H., Bromiley, P., & Hendrickx, M. (2000). The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21(4), 455--472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Penrose, E., & Penrose, E. T. (2009). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford university press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Lankauskienė, T., & Tvaronavičienė, M. (2013). Economic sector performance and growth: contemporary approaches in the context of sustainable development. Intellectual Economics, 7(3), 355--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wild K., Creighton B., Deloitte & Touche technical department (1999) Earnings per share. In: GAAP 2000. Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Basu, S. (1977). Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: A test of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 32(3), 663--682.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1988). Dividend yields and expected stock returns. Journal of financial economics, 22(1), 3--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Braga, M. D. (2016). Strategic Asset Allocation with Mean-Variance Optimisation. In Asset Management and Institutional Investors, 97--172. Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Leahy, D., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Divide and rule: geographical diversification and the multinational firm. Open economies review, 15(4), 363--374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Beaton, N.J., 2012. Fair Value in Financial Reporting. Standards of Value: Theory and Applications, pp.323--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Endres, A., & Radke, V. (2012). Economics for environmental studies: A strategic guide to micro-and macroeconomics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Cakici, N., & Topyan, K. (2014). Risk and Return in Asian Emerging Markets: A Practitioner's Guide. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Von Pfeil, E. (1988). Effective Control of Currency Risks. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Suriani S., Kumar M. D., Jamil, F., Muneer S., (2015). Impact of exchange rate on stock market. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5, 385--388.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Pilbeam, K. (2005). Portfolio Analysis: Risk and Return in Financial Markets. In Finance and Financial Markets (pp. 156--187). Palgrave, London.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Lipinski, P. W., (2013). Portfolio selection models based on characteristics of return distributions. Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Prokopczuk, M. (2011). Optimal portfolio choice in the presence of domestic systemic risk: empirical evidence from stock markets. Decisions in Economics and Finance, 34(2), 141--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. www.eima.org.eg (last accessed 31 October 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (Eds.). (2013). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Basingstoke, United Kingdom: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Fazzini, M. (2018). Market-Based Method. In Business Valuation, 123--174. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. www.csi.ca (last accessed 31 October 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Portfolio Selection Factors: Egypt Equity Market Case Study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ICSIE '19: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software and Information Engineering
          April 2019
          276 pages
          ISBN:9781450361057
          DOI:10.1145/3328833

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 9 April 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader