skip to main content
research-article

MenstruLoss: Sensor For Menstrual Blood Loss Monitoring

Published:21 June 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Self-monitoring of menstrual blood loss volume could lead to early detection of multiple gynecological diseases. In this paper, we describe the development of a textile-based blood volume sensor which can be integrated into the sanitary napkin to quantify the menstrual blood loss during menstruation. It is based on sensing the resistance change detected as the output voltage change, with the added volume of fluid. Benchtop characterization tests with 5 mL of fluid determined the effect of spacing, orientation and weight, and location of fluid drop on the sensor. The sensor has been evaluated by intravenous blood samples collected from 18 participants and menstrual blood samples collected from 10 participants for four months. The collected intravenous blood samples and menstrual blood samples were used to create two regression model that can predict the blood volume and menstrual blood volume from the voltage input with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 11-15% and 15-30% respectively.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Carol A. Brink. 1990. Absorbent Pads, Garments, and Management Strategies. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 38, 3 (1990), 368--373. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03524.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S. Coyle et al. 2010. BIOTEX-Biosensing Textiles for Personalised Healthcare Management. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 14, 2 (March 2010), 364--370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Sherif A. El-Nashar, Sherif A. M. Shazly, and Abimbola O. Famuyide. 2015. Pictorial blood loss assessment chart for quantification of menstrual blood loss: a systematic review. Gynecological Surgery 12, 3 (2015), 157--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Raymond M. Fish and Leslie A. Geddes. 2009. Conduction of electrical current to and through the human body: a review. Eplasty 9 (12 Oct 2009), e44--e44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19907637 19907637{pmid}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Esther W. Foo, Robert Mt Pettys-Baker, Shawn Sullivan, and Lucy E. Dunne. 2017. Garment-integrated Wetness Sensing for Leak Detection. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 26--33. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Michael J. Gannon, Philip Day, Nahed Hammadieh, and Nicholas Johnson. 1996. A new method for measuring menstrual blood loss and its use in screening women before endometrial ablation. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 103, 10 (01 Oct 1996), 1029--1033.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brynja R. Gudmundsdottir, Elin F. Hjaltalin, Gudrun Bragadottir, Arnar Hauksson, Reynir T. Geirsson, and Pall T. Onundarson. 2009. Quantification of menstrual flow by weighing protective pads in women with normal, decreased or increased menstruation. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 88, 3 (01 Jan 2009), 275--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. T H Chimbira, A.B.M. Anderson, and A c Turnbull. 1980. Relation between measured menstrual blood loss and patient's subjective assessment of loss, duration of bleeding, number of sanitary towels used, uterine weight and endometrial surface area. British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 87 (08 1980), 603--9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Hallberg and L. Nilsson. 1964. Determination of Menstrual Blood Loss. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 16, 2 (1964), 244--248. arXiv:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00365516409060511Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Patricia J. Scully John Vaughan, Christopher Woodyatt. 2007. Polymer optical fibre sensor to monitor skin moisture, Vol. 6619.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Carsten Linti, Hansjurgen Horter, Peter Osterreicher, and Heinrich Planck. 2006. Sensory Baby Vest for the Monitoring of Infants. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (BSN '06). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 135--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Mattana, T. Kinkeldei, D. Leuenberger, C. Ataman, J. J. Ruan, F. Molina-Lopez, A. V. Quintero, G. Nisato, G. TrÃűster, D. Briand, and N. F. de Rooij. 2013. Woven Temperature and Humidity Sensors on Flexible Plastic Substrates for E-Textile Applications. IEEE Sensors Journal 13, 10 (Oct 2013), 3901--3909.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. John Newton, Geoffrey Barnard, and William Collins. 1977. A rapid method for measuring menstrual blood loss using automatic extraction. Contraception 16, 3 (1977), 269--282.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Pengfei PANG, Xianjuan GAO, Xilin XIAO, Wenyue YANG, Qingyun CAI, and Shouzhuo YAO. 2007. A Wireless pH Sensor Using Magnetoelasticity for Measurement of Body Fluid Acidity. Analytical Sciences 23, 4 (2007), 463--467.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Bosco Fernandes PhD, Patrick Gaydecki PhD, Felicity Jowitt MSc, and Eleanor van den Heuvel MSc. 2011. Urinary Incontinence: A Vibration Alert System for Detecting Pad Overflow. Assistive Technology 23, 4 (2011), 218--224. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2011.614675 PMID: 22256670.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Peter C. Reid, Adeyemi Coker, and Rosemary Coltart. 2000. Assessment of menstrual blood loss using a pictorial chart: a validation study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 107, 3 (01 Mar 2000), 320--322.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ulrike Schumacher, Jens Schumacher, Uwe Mellinger, Christoph Gerlinger, Andreas Wienke, and Jan Endrikat. 2012. Estimation of menstrual blood loss volume based on menstrual diary and laboratory data. BMC Women's Health 12, 1 (20 Aug 2012), 24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. J. Siden, A. Koptioug, and M. Gulliksson. 2004. The "smart" diaper moisture detection system. In 2004 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37535), Vol. 2. 659--662 Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jai Kyoung Sim, Sunghyun Yoon, and Young-Ho Cho. 2018. Wearable Sweat Rate Sensors for Human Thermal Comfort Monitoring. Scientific Reports 8, 1 (2018), 1181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Laura Toxqui, Ana M. Pérez-Granados, Ruth Blanco-Rojo, Ione Wright, and M. Pilar Vaquero. 2014. A simple and feasible questionnaire to estimate menstrual blood loss: relationship with hematological and gynecological parameters in young women. BMC Womens Health 14 (30 May 2014), 71--71. 24886470{pmid}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Chatchai Treetampinich, Komsun Suwannarurk, Athita Chanthasenanont, Somsak Fongsupa, T Tamrongterakul, and Manee Rattanachaiyanont. 2007. Blood absorption capacity of various sanitary pads available in Thailand. Siraj Med J 59 (01 2007), 303--306.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Xingyu Zhang, Tao Zhang, Alistair A. Young, and Xiaosong Li. 2014. Applications and Comparisons of Four Time Series Models in Epidemiological Surveillance Data. PLOS ONE 9, 2 (02 2014), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gengheng Zhou, Joon-Hyung Byun, Youngseok Oh, Byung-Mun Jung, Hwa-Jin Cha, Dong-Gi Seong, Moon-Kwang Um, Sangil Hyun, and Tsu-Wei Chou. 2017. Highly Sensitive Wearable Textile-Based Humidity Sensor Made of High-Strength, Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Filaments. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9, 5 (08 Feb 2017), 4788--4797.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. MenstruLoss: Sensor For Menstrual Blood Loss Monitoring

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 3, Issue 2
          June 2019
          802 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3341982
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 June 2019
          • Accepted: 1 April 2019
          • Revised: 1 February 2019
          • Received: 1 August 2018
          Published in imwut Volume 3, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader