skip to main content
10.1145/3330180.3330186acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccbnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigation into User-Centric QoE and Network-Centric Parameters for YouTube Service on Mobile Networks

Published: 12 April 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The number of users on mobile networks has continuously increased due to many attractive multimedia services. According to this reason, the service operators have to regularly improve their networks in order to retain the need of existing users and also attract the expectation of new users. Nowadays, the operators concern Quality of Experience (QoE) metric as the key performance index to evaluate the networks rather than Quality of Service (QoS) metric. However, the QoE metric is based on the viewpoints of domain's experiences which the experiences from users and networks might not be correlated. Therefore, in this paper, the demonstration of user-centric and network-centric viewpoints based on QoS measurement via Drive Tests on mobile networks is presented. The difference viewpoints of QoE derived from user-centric and QoS parameters achieved by network-centric have been investigated through mobile networks of top three operators in Thailand. The results indicate that only some QoS parameters can provide the same trend as QoE. It implies that the operators should set some parameters as the higher priority for improving the network quality if they want to satisfy the experience of users.

References

[1]
Index, C. V. N. (2017). Global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016-2021 white paper. Cisco: San Jose, CA, USA.
[2]
Agiwal, M., Roy, A., & Saxena, N. (2016). Next generation 5G wireless networks: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 18(3), 1617--1655.
[3]
Brunnström, K., Beker, S. A., De Moor, K., Dooms, A., Egger, S., Garcia, M. N., ... & Lawlor, B. (2013). Qualinet white paper on definitions of quality of experience.
[4]
Chen, Y., Wu, K., & Zhang, Q. (2015). From QoS to QoE: A tutorial on video quality assessment. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17(2), 1126--1165.
[5]
Mjhool, A. Y. (2016). Evaluation of User Perceived QoE in Mobile Systems Using Social Media Analytics. {online} Available: https://repository.lib.fit.edu/handle/11141/1133.
[6]
Buenestado, V., Toril, M., Luna-Ramírez, S., Ruiz-Avilés, J. M., & Mendo, A. (2017). Self-tuning of remote electrical tilts based on call traces for coverage and capacity optimization in LTE. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 66(5), 4315--4326.
[7]
Ouyang, Y., Li, Z., Su, L., Lu, W., & Lin, Z. (2017). APP-SON: Application characteristics-driven SON to optimize 4G/5G network performance and quality of experience. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 1514--1523).
[8]
Tervo, O., Pennanen, H., Christopoulos, D., Chatzinotas, S., & Ottersten, B. (2018). Distributed optimization for coordinated beamforming in multicell multigroup multicast systems: Power minimization and SINR balancing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(1), 171--185
[9]
Wang, R., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Chen, K., & Tao, X. (2017). QoE-Oriented Random Access for Hybrid MTC and Cellular Communications. In 2017 IEEE 85th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) (pp. 1--6).
[10]
Shivakumar, M. V., & Gautam, S. (2016). MOS estimate improvement of ITU-T opinion model through erasure coding technique. In 2016 Conference on Advances in Signal Processing (CASP) (pp. 54--59). IEEE.
[11]
Jahromi, H. Z., Hines, A., & Delanev, D. T. (2018). Towards application-aware networking: Ml-based end-to-end application kpi/qoe metrics characterization in sdn. In 2018 Tenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN) (pp. 126--131). IEEE.
[12]
Anchuen, P., Uthansakul, P., & Uthansakul, M. (2016). QOE model in cellular networks based on QOS measurements using Neural Network approach. In 2016 13th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON) (pp. 1--5). IEEE.
[13]
{online} Available: http://www.azenqos.com/
[14]
International Telecommunication Union (1996). ITU-T Rec. P.800: Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)QoS to QoE Mapping Based on Optimised BP Neural Networks2023 8th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)10.1109/ICIVC58118.2023.10270792(801-806)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2023
  • (2021)QoE Analysis for Improving Multimedia Services Based on Different Operating Situations on Cellular NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31062419(116215-116230)Online publication date: 2021
  • (2021)Too Late for Playback: Estimation of Video Stream Quality in Rural and Urban ContextsPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-030-72582-2_9(141-157)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Investigation into User-Centric QoE and Network-Centric Parameters for YouTube Service on Mobile Networks

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCBN '19: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communications and Broadband Networking
    April 2019
    76 pages
    ISBN:9781450362474
    DOI:10.1145/3330180
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • UPM: Universiti Putra Malaysia
    • NITech: Nagoya Institute of Technology
    • Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Georgia

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 April 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Drive Tests
    2. Long-Term Evolution
    3. Network-centric
    4. Quality of Experience
    5. Quality of Service
    6. User-centric

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICCBN 2019

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)QoS to QoE Mapping Based on Optimised BP Neural Networks2023 8th International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC)10.1109/ICIVC58118.2023.10270792(801-806)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2023
    • (2021)QoE Analysis for Improving Multimedia Services Based on Different Operating Situations on Cellular NetworksIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2021.31062419(116215-116230)Online publication date: 2021
    • (2021)Too Late for Playback: Estimation of Video Stream Quality in Rural and Urban ContextsPassive and Active Measurement10.1007/978-3-030-72582-2_9(141-157)Online publication date: 29-Mar-2021
    • (2020)QoE-Aware Self-Tuning of Service Priority Factor for Resource Allocation Optimization in LTE NetworksIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology10.1109/TVT.2019.295256869:1(887-900)Online publication date: Jan-2020

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media