skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331231acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human Behavior Inspired Machine Reading Comprehension

Published: 18 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Machine Reading Comprehension (MRC) is one of the most challenging tasks in both NLP and IR researches. Recently, a number of deep neural models have been successfully adopted to some simplified MRC task settings, whose performances were close to or even better than human beings. However, these models still have large performance gaps with human beings in more practical settings, such as MS MARCO and DuReader datasets. Although there are many works studying human reading behavior, the behavior patterns in complex reading comprehension scenarios remain under-investigated. We believe that a better understanding of how human reads and allocates their attention during reading comprehension processes can help improve the performance of MRC tasks. In this paper, we conduct a lab study to investigate human's reading behavior patterns during reading comprehension tasks, where 32 users are recruited to take 60 distinct tasks. By analyzing the collected eye-tracking data and answers from participants, we propose a two-stage reading behavior model, in which the first stage is to search for possible answer candidates and the second stage is to generate the final answer through a comparison and verification process. We also find that human's attention distribution is affected by both question-dependent factors (e.g., answer and soft matching signal with questions) and question-independent factors (e.g., position, IDF and Part-of-Speech tags of words). We extract features derived from the two-stage reading behavior model to predict human's attention signals during reading comprehension, which significantly improves performance in the MRC task. Findings in our work may bring insight into the understanding of human reading and information seeking processes, and help the machine to better meet users' information needs.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (cite3-11h40-d2.mp4)

References

[1]
Jeanette Altarriba, Judith F Kroll, Alexandra Sholl, and Keith Rayner. 1996. The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times. Memory & Cognition 24, 4 (1996), 477--492.
[2]
Maria Barrett, Joachim Bingel, Frank Keller, and Anders Søgaard. 2016. Weakly supervised part-of-speech tagging using eye-tracking data. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers).
[3]
Klinton Bicknell and Roger Levy. 2010. A rational model of eye movement control in reading. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
[4]
Georg Buscher, Andreas Dengel, Ralf Biedert, and Ludger V Elst. 2012. Attentive documents: Eye tracking as implicit feedback for information retrieval and beyond. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 1, 2 (2012), 9.
[5]
Kyunghyun Cho, Bart Van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078 (2014).
[6]
Uschi Cop, Denis Drieghe, and Wouter Duyck. 2015. Eye movement patterns in natural reading: A comparison of monolingual and bilingual reading of a novel. PloS one 10, 8 (2015), e0134008.
[7]
Robert G. Crowder and Richard K. Wagner. 1992. The psychology of reading: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Bhuwan Dhingra, Hanxiao Liu, Zhilin Yang, William W. Cohen, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2016. Gated-attention readers for text comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01549 (2016).
[9]
Ralf Engbert, André Longtin, and Reinhold Kliegl. 2002. A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision research 42, 5 (2002), 621--636.
[10]
Ralf Engbert, Antje Nuthmann, Eike M. Richter, and Reinhold Kliegl. 2005. SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological review 112, 4 (2005), 777.
[11]
Joseph L. Fleiss. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological bulletin 76, 5 (1971), 378.
[12]
Yoav Freund, Raj Iyer, Robert E. Schapire, and Yoram Singer. 2003. An efficient boosting algorithm for combining preferences. Journal of machine learning research 4, Nov (2003), 933--969.
[13]
Jerome H. Friedman. 2001. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of statistics (2001), 1189--1232.
[14]
Wei He, Kai Liu, Jing Liu, Yajuan Lyu, Shiqi Zhao, Xinyan Xiao, Yuan Liu, Yizhong Wang, Hua Wu, Qiaoqiao She, et al. 2017. Dureader: A Chinese machine reading comprehension dataset from real-world applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05073 (2017).
[15]
Marcel A. Just and Patricia A. Carpenter. 1980. A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological review 87, 4 (1980), 329.
[16]
J. Richard Landis and Gary G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 1 (1977), 159--174.
[17]
Jiajia Li, Grace Ngai, Hong Va Leong, and Stephen C. F. Chan. 2016. Your eye tells how well you comprehend. In Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2016 IEEE 40th Annual.
[18]
Xiangsheng Li, Yiqun Liu, Jiaxin Mao, Zexue He, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. {n. d.}. Understanding reading attention distribution during relevance judgement. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
[19]
Chin-Yew Lin and Franz Josef Och. 2004. Automatic evaluation of machine translation quality using longest common subsequence and skip-bigram statistics. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.
[20]
Yiqun Liu, Chao Wang, Ke Zhou, Jianyun Nie, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2014. From skimming to reading: A two-stage examination model for web search. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management.
[21]
Yiqun Liu, Xiaohui Xie, Chao Wang, Jian-Yun Nie, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. 2017. Time-aware click model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 35, 3 (2017), 16.
[22]
omas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013).
[23]
Tri Nguyen, Mir Rosenberg, Xia Song, Jianfeng Gao, Saurabh Tiwary, Rangan Majumder, and Li Deng. 2016. MS MARCO: A human generated machine reading comprehension dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.09268 (2016).
[24]
Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics.
[25]
Tao Qin and Tie-Yan Liu. 2013. Introducing LETOR 4.0 datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.2597 (2013).
[26]
Pranav Rajpurkar, Jian Zhang, Konstantin Lopyrev, and Percy Liang. 2016. Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250 (2016).
[27]
Keith Rayner. 1998. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological bulletin 124, 3 (1998), 372.
[28]
Erik D. Reichle, Alexander Pollatsek, Donald L. Fisher, and Keith Rayner. 1998. Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological review 105, 1 (1998), 125.
[29]
Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner, and Alexander Pollatsek. 2003. The EZ Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and brain sciences 26, 4 (2003), 445--476.
[30]
Yelong Shen, Po-Sen Huang, Jianfeng Gao, and Weizhu Chen. 2017. Reasonet: Learning to stop reading in machine comprehension. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
[31]
Alessandro Sordoni, Philip Bachman, Adam Trischler, and Yoshua Bengio. 2016. Iterative alternating neural attention for machine reading. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.02245 (2016).
[32]
Sara Stymne, Henrik Danielsson, Sofia Bremin, Hongzhan Hu, Johanna Karlsson, Anna Prytz Lillkull, and Martin Wester. 2012. Eye tracking as a tool for machine translation error analysis. In LREC.
[33]
Chuanqi Tan, Furu Wei, Nan Yang, Bowen Du, Weifeng Lv, and Ming Zhou. 2017. S-net: From answer extraction to answer generation for machine reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.04815 (2017).
[34]
Takenobu Tokunaga, Hitoshi Nishikawa, and Tomoya Iwakura. 2017. An eyetracking study of named entity annotation. In Proceedings of the International Conference Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing, RANLP.
[35]
Adam Trischler, Zheng Ye, Xingdi Yuan, Philip Bachman, Alessandro Sordoni, and Kaheer Suleman. 2016. Natural language comprehension with the EpiReader. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
[36]
Wenhui Wang, Nan Yang, Furu Wei, Baobao Chang, and Ming Zhou. 2017. Gated self-matching networks for reading comprehension and question answering. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers).
[37]
Yizhong Wang, Kai Liu, Jing Liu, Wei He, Yajuan Lyu, Hua Wu, Sujian Li, and Haifeng Wang. 2018. Multi-passage machine reading comprehension with crosspassage answer verification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02220 (2018).
[38]
Dirk Weissenborn. 2016. Separating answers from queries for neural reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.03316 (2016).
[39]
Qiang Wu, Christopher J. C. Burges, Krysta M. Svore, and Jianfeng Gao. 2010. Adapting boosting for information retrieval measures. Information Retrieval 13, 3 (2010), 254--270.
[40]
Liu Yang, Qingyao Ai, Damiano Spina, Ruey-Cheng Chen, Liang Pang, W. Bruce Croft, Jiafeng Guo, and Falk Scholer. 2016. Beyond factoid QA: Effective methods for non-factoid answer sentence retrieval. In European Conference on Information Retrieval.
[41]
Adams Wei Yu, David Dohan, Minh-Thang Luong, Rui Zhao, Kai Chen, Mohammad Norouzi, and Quoc V. Le. 2018. QANet: Combining local convolution with global self-Attention for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.09541 (2018).

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)VTG-GPT: Tuning-Free Zero-Shot Video Temporal Grounding with GPTApplied Sciences10.3390/app1405189414:5(1894)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information RetrievalProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657849(1916-1929)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Gist, Content, Target-Oriented: A 3-Level Human-Like Framework for Video Moment RetrievalIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2024.344367226(11044-11056)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
July 2019
1512 pages
ISBN:9781450361729
DOI:10.1145/3331184
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. eye tracking
  2. reading behavior model
  3. reading comprehension
  4. user behavior analysis

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • National Key Research and Development Program of China
  • Natural Science Foundation of China

Conference

SIGIR '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 426 submissions, 20%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)40
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5
Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)VTG-GPT: Tuning-Free Zero-Shot Video Temporal Grounding with GPTApplied Sciences10.3390/app1405189414:5(1894)Online publication date: 25-Feb-2024
  • (2024)Evaluating Generative Ad Hoc Information RetrievalProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3626772.3657849(1916-1929)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2024
  • (2024)Gist, Content, Target-Oriented: A 3-Level Human-Like Framework for Video Moment RetrievalIEEE Transactions on Multimedia10.1109/TMM.2024.344367226(11044-11056)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2024
  • (2024)Gazing After Glancing: Edge Information Guided Perception Network for Video Moment RetrievalIEEE Signal Processing Letters10.1109/LSP.2024.340353331(1535-1539)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)Where Did I Get Lost? A Prototype Tool for Predicting Local-Level Comprehension Difficulties With Wearables and Explainable Machine LearningIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.348080912(152224-152240)Online publication date: 2024
  • (2024)LLM Assists Hypothesis Generation and Testing for Deliberative QuestionsNatural Language Processing and Chinese Computing10.1007/978-981-97-9434-8_33(424-436)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2024
  • (2023)Retrospective Multi-granularity Fusion Network for Chinese Idiom Cloze-style Reading ComprehensionACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing10.1145/360337022:7(1-20)Online publication date: 20-Jul-2023
  • (2023)Achieving Human Parity on Visual Question AnsweringACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/357283341:3(1-40)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2023
  • (2023)A Passage-Level Reading Behavior Model for Mobile SearchProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202310.1145/3543507.3583343(3236-3246)Online publication date: 30-Apr-2023
  • (2023)LadRa-Net: Locally Aware Dynamic Reread Attention Net for Sentence Semantic MatchingIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems10.1109/TNNLS.2021.310318534:2(853-866)Online publication date: Feb-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media