skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331247acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Effects of User Negative Experience in Mobile News Streaming

Published: 18 July 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Online news streaming services have been one of the major information acquisition resources for mobile users. In many cases, users click an article but find it cannot satisfy or even annoy them. Intuitively, these negative experiences will affect users' behaviors and satisfaction, but such effects have not been well understood. In this work, a retrospective analysis is conducted using real users' log data, containing user's explicit feedback of negative experiences, from a commercial news streaming application. Through multiple intra-session comparison experiments, we find that in current session, users will spend less time reading the content, lose activeness and leave sooner after having negative experiences. Later return and significant changes of user behaviors in the next session are also observed, which demonstrates the existence of inter-session effects of negative experiences.
Since users' negative experiences are generally implicit, we further investigate the possibility and the approach to automatically identify them. Results show that using changes of both users' intra-session and inter-session behaviors achieves significant improvement. Besides the effects on user behaviors, we also explore the effects on user satisfaction by incorporating a laboratory user study. Results show that negative experiences reduce user satisfaction in the current session, and the impact will last to the next session. Moreover, we demonstrate users' negative feedback helps on the meta-evaluation of online metrics. Our research has comprehensively analyzed the impacts of users' item-level negative experiences, and shed light on the understanding of user behaviors and satisfaction.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (cite2-14h30-d3.mp4)

References

[1]
Nir Grinberg. Identifying modes of user engagement with online news and their relationship to information gain in text. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web, pages 1745--1754. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2018.
[2]
Heather L. O'Brien and Elaine G. Toms. What is user engagement? a conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6):938--955, 2008.
[3]
Jean Garcia-Gathright, Brian St. Thomas, Christine Hosey, Zahra Nazari, and Fernando Diaz. Understanding and evaluating user satisfaction with music discovery. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 55--64. ACM, 2018.
[4]
Frances A. Pogacar, Amira Ghenai, Mark D. Smucker, and Charles L. A. Clarke. The positive and negative influence of search results on people's decisions about the efficacy of medical treatments. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval, pages 209--216. ACM, 2017.
[5]
Ryen White. Beliefs and biases in web search. In Proceedings of the 36th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '13, pages 3--12, New York, NY, USA, 2013. ACM.
[6]
Ben Miroglio, David Zeber, Jofish Kaye, and Rebecca Weiss. The effect of ad blocking on user engagement with the web. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web, pages 813--821. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2018.
[7]
Soroush Vosoughi, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380):1146--1151, 2018.
[8]
Hongyu Lu, Min Zhang, and Ma Shaoping. Between clicks and satisfaction: Study on multi-phase user preferences and satisfaction for online news reading. In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 2018.
[9]
Georges E. Dupret and Benjamin Piwowarski. A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. In Proceedings of the 31st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 331--338. ACM, 2008.
[10]
Rong Pan, Yunhong Zhou, Bin Cao, Nathan N. Liu, Rajan Lukose, Martin Scholz, and Qiang Yang. One-class collaborative filtering. In Data Mining, 2008. ICDM'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on, pages 502--511. IEEE, 2008.
[11]
Yifan Hu, Yehuda Koren, and Chris Volinsky. Collaborative filtering for implicit feedback datasets. In Data Mining, 2008. ICDM'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on, pages 263--272. Ieee, 2008.
[12]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, and Geri Gay. Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback. In ACM SIGIR Forum, volume 51, pages 4--11. ACM, 2017.
[13]
Thorsten Joachims, Laura Granka, Bing Pan, Helene Hembrooke, Filip Radlinski, and Geri Gay. Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 25(2):7, 2007.
[14]
Yisong Yue, Rajan Patel, and Hein Roehrig. Beyond position bias: Examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 1011--1018. ACM, 2010.
[15]
Hongyu Lu, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma, Yunqiu Shao, Yiqun Liu, and Shaoping Ma. Quality effects on user preferences and behaviors in mobile news streaming. In The World Wide Web Conference, pages 1187--1197. ACM, 2019.
[16]
Chao Wang, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, Meihong Zheng, Jing Qian, and Kuo Zhang. Incorporating vertical results into search click models. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 503--512. ACM, 2013.
[17]
Jimmy Lin, Salman Mohammed, Royal Sequiera, and Luchen Tan. Update delivery mechanisms for prospective information needs: An analysis of attention in mobile users. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '18, pages 785--794, New York, NY, USA, 2018. ACM.
[18]
Steve Fox, Kuldeep Karnawat, Mark Mydland, Susan Dumais, and Thomas White. Evaluating implicit measures to improve web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 23(2):147--168, 2005.
[19]
Ahmed Hassan and Ryen W. White. Personalized models of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management, pages 2009--2018. ACM, 2013.
[20]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, and Imed Zitouni. Comparing client and server dwell time estimates for click-level satisfaction prediction. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research & development in information retrieval, pages 895--898. ACM, 2014.
[21]
Ahmed Hassan. A semi-supervised approach to modeling web search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 275--284. ACM, 2012.
[22]
Youngho Kim, Ahmed Hassan, Ryen W. White, and Imed Zitouni. Modeling dwell time to predict click-level satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM international conference on Web search and data mining, pages 193--202. ACM, 2014.
[23]
Peifeng Yin, Ping Luo, Wang-Chien Lee, and Min Wang. Silence is also evidence: interpreting dwell time for recommendation from psychological perspective. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 989--997. ACM, 2013.
[24]
Jeff Huang and Abdigani Diriye. Web user interaction mining from touch-enabled mobile devices. In HCIR workshop, 2012.
[25]
Qian Zhao, Shuo Chang, F. Maxwell Harper, and Joseph A. Konstan. Gaze prediction for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pages 131--138. ACM, 2016.
[26]
Yixuan Li, Pingmei Xu, Dmitry Lagun, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. Towards measuring and inferring user interest from gaze. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pages 525--533. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 2017.
[27]
Thorsten Hennig-Thurau and Alexander Klee. The impact of customer satisfaction and relationship quality on customer retention: A critical reassessment and model development. Psychology & marketing, 14(8):737--764, 1997.
[28]
Louise T. Su. Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 28(4):503--516, 1992.
[29]
Diane Kelly et al. Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, 3(1-2):1--224, 2009.
[30]
Henry A. Feild, James Allan, and Rosie Jones. Predicting searcher frustration. In Proceedings of the 33rd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 34--41. ACM, 2010.
[31]
Azzah Al-Maskari and Mark Sanderson. A review of factors influencing user satisfaction in information retrieval. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 61(5):859--868, May 2010.
[32]
Jiaxin Mao, Yiqun Liu, Ke Zhou, Jian Yun Nie, Jingtao Song, Min Zhang, Hengliang Luo, Hengliang Luo, and Hengliang Luo. When does relevance mean usefulness and user satisfaction in web search? In International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 463--472, 2016.
[33]
Ovidiu Dan and Brian D. Davison. Measuring and predicting search engine users' satisfaction. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 49(1):18, 2016.
[34]
Martijn C. Willemsen, Mark P. Graus, and Bart P. Knijnenburg. Understanding the role of latent feature diversification on choice difficulty and satisfaction. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 26(4):347--389, Oct 2016.
[35]
Saúl Vargas. Novelty and diversity enhancement and evaluation in recommender systems and information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR '14, pages 1281--1281, New York, NY, USA, 2014. ACM.
[36]
Olivier Chapelle, Donald Metlzer, Ya Zhang, and Pierre Grinspan. Expected reciprocal rank for graded relevance. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 621--630. ACM, 2009.
[37]
Aleksandr Chuklin, Pavel Serdyukov, and Maarten De Rijke. Click model-based information retrieval metrics. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, pages 493--502. ACM, 2013.
[38]
Filip Radlinski, Madhu Kurup, and Thorsten Joachims. How does clickthrough data reflect retrieval quality? In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management, pages 43--52. ACM, 2008.
[39]
Ye Chen, Ke Zhou, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. Meta-evaluation of online and offline web search evaluation metrics. SIGIR, 2017.
[40]
Ahmed Hassan, Xiaolin Shi, Nick Craswell, and Bill Ramsey. Beyond clicks: query reformulation as a predictor of search satisfaction. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Conference on information & knowledge management, pages 2019--2028. ACM, 2013.
[41]
Masrour Zoghi, Tomáš Tunys, Lihong Li, Damien Jose, Junyan Chen, Chun Ming Chin, and Maarten de Rijke. Click-based hot fixes for underperforming torso queries. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 195--204. ACM, 2016.
[42]
Kun Kuang, Peng Cui, Bo Li, Meng Jiang, Shiqiang Yang, and Fei Wang. Treatment effect estimation with data-driven variable decomposition, 2017.
[43]
Kun Kuang, Meng Jiang, Peng Cui, and Shiqiang Yang. Steering social media promotions with effective strategies. In ICDM, pages 985--990, 2016.
[44]
Ben Miroglio, David Zeber, Jofish Kaye, and Rebecca Weiss. The effect of ad blocking on user engagement with the web. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, WWW '18, pages 813--821, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.
[45]
Julia Kiseleva, Kyle Williams, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Aidan C. Crook, Imed Zitouni, and Tasos Anastasakos. Predicting user satisfaction with intelligent assistants. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pages 45--54. ACM, 2016.
[46]
Fan Zhang, Ke Zhou, Yunqiu Shao, Cheng Luo, Min Zhang, and Shaoping Ma. How well do offline and online evaluation metrics measure user satisfaction in web image search? In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval, pages 615--624. ACM, 2018.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Where Are the Values? A Systematic Literature Review on News Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36548052:3(1-40)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
  • (2024)A holistic view on positive and negative implicit feedback for micro-video recommendationKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111299284(111299)Online publication date: Jan-2024
  • (2024)Data Collaborative Contrastive Recommendation model with self-adaptive noiseExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124899256(124899)Online publication date: Dec-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Effects of User Negative Experience in Mobile News Streaming

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
      July 2019
      1512 pages
      ISBN:9781450361729
      DOI:10.1145/3331184
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 18 July 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. log analysis
      2. negative experience
      3. news recommendation
      4. user behavior modeling
      5. user satisfaction

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Funding Sources

      • Natural Science Foundation of China
      • National Key Research and Development Program of China

      Conference

      SIGIR '19
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate 84 of 426 submissions, 20%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 792 of 3,983 submissions, 20%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
      Reflects downloads up to 27 Feb 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Where Are the Values? A Systematic Literature Review on News Recommender SystemsACM Transactions on Recommender Systems10.1145/36548052:3(1-40)Online publication date: 28-Mar-2024
      • (2024)A holistic view on positive and negative implicit feedback for micro-video recommendationKnowledge-Based Systems10.1016/j.knosys.2023.111299284(111299)Online publication date: Jan-2024
      • (2024)Data Collaborative Contrastive Recommendation model with self-adaptive noiseExpert Systems with Applications10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124899256(124899)Online publication date: Dec-2024
      • (2024)Robust enhanced collaborative filtering without explicit noise filteringThe Journal of Supercomputing10.1007/s11227-024-06086-w80:11(15763-15782)Online publication date: 6-Apr-2024
      • (2023)SLED: Structure Learning based Denoising for RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/361138542:2(1-31)Online publication date: 8-Nov-2023
      • (2023)Scanning or Simply Unengaged in Reading? Opportune Moments for Pushed News Notifications and Their Relationship with Smartphone Users' Choice of News-reading ModesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042687:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
      • (2023)Understanding User Immersion in Online Short Video InteractionProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management10.1145/3583780.3615099(731-740)Online publication date: 21-Oct-2023
      • (2023)Personal or General? A Hybrid Strategy with Multi-factors for News RecommendationACM Transactions on Information Systems10.1145/355537341:2(1-29)Online publication date: 13-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Improving Implicit Feedback-Based Recommendation through Multi-Behavior AlignmentProceedings of the 46th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval10.1145/3539618.3591697(932-941)Online publication date: 19-Jul-2023
      • (2023)Long and Short-Term Interest Contrastive Learning Under Filter-Enhanced Sequential RecommendationIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2023.328602111(95928-95938)Online publication date: 2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Figures

      Tables

      Media

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media