skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331286acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Query-Task Mapping

Published:18 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Several recent task-based search studies aim at splitting query logs into sets of queries for the same task or information need. We address the natural next step: mapping a currently submitted query to an appropriate task in an already task-split log. This query-task mapping can, for instance, enhance query suggestions---rendering efficiency of the mapping, besides accuracy, a key objective. Our main contributions are three large benchmark datasets and preliminary experiments with four query-task mapping approaches: (1) a Trie-based approach, (2) MinHash~LSH, (3) word movers distance in a Word2Vec setup, and (4) an inverted index-based approach. The experiments show that the fast and accurate inverted index-based method forms a strong baseline.

References

  1. Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Ryen W. White, Patrick Pantel, Susan T. Dumais, and Yi-Min Wang. 2014. Supporting complex search tasks. In Proceedings of CIKM 2014, 829--838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Mayank Bawa, Tyson Condie, and Prasanna Ganesan. 2005. LSH Forest: Self-tuning indexes for similarity search. In Proceedings of WWW 2005, 651--660. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paolo Boldi, Francesco Bonchi, Carlos Castillo, Debora Donato, Aristides Gionis, and Sebastiano Vigna. 2008. The query-flow graph: Model and applications. In Proceedings of CIKM 2008, 609--618. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Ben Carterette, Evangelos Kanoulas, Mark M. Hall, and Paul D. Clough. 2014. Overview of the TREC 2014 Session track. In Proceedings of TREC 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Rene De La Briandais. 1959. File searching using variable length keys. In Proceedings of IRE-AIEE-ACM 1959, 295--298. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Debora Donato, Francesco Bonchi, Tom Chi, and Yoëlle S. Maarek. 2010. Do you want to take notes?: Identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad. In Proceedings of WWW 2010, 321--330. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Daniel Gayo-Avello. 2009. A survey on session detection methods in query logs and a proposal for future evaluation. Information Sciences, Vol. 179, 12 (2009), 1822--1843. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Matthias Hagen, Jakob Gomoll, Anna Beyer, and Benno Stein. 2013. From search session detection to search mission detection. In Proceedings of OAIR 2013, 85--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matthias Hagen, Martin Potthast, Michael Völske, Jakob Gomoll, and Benno Stein. 2016. How writers search: Analyzing the search and writing logs of non-fictional essays. In Proceedings of CHIIR 2016, 193--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Daqing He, Ayse Göker, and David J. Harper. 2002. Combining evidence for automatic web session identification. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 38, 5 (2002), 727--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Wen Hua, Yangqiu Song, Haixun Wang, and Xiaofang Zhou. 2013. Identifying users' topical tasks in web search. In Proceedings of WSDM 2013, 93--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Bernard J. Jansen, Amanda Spink, Chris Blakely, and Sherry Koshman. 2007. Defining a session on web search engines. JASIST, Vol. 58, 6 (2007), 862--871. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Rosie Jones and Kristina Lisa Klinkner. 2008. Beyond the session timeout: Automatic hierarchical segmentation of search topics in query logs. In Proceedings of CIKM 2008, 699--708. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Evangelos Kanoulas, Emine Yilmaz, Rishabh Mehrotra, Ben Carterette, Nick Craswell, and Peter Bailey. 2017. TREC 2017 Tasks track overview. In Proceedings of TREC 2017 .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Alexander Kotov, Paul N. Bennett, Ryen W. White, Susan T. Dumais, and Jaime Teevan. 2011. Modeling and analysis of cross-session search tasks. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2011, 5--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Matt J. Kusner, Yu Sun, Nicholas I. Kolkin, and Kilian Q. Weinberger. 2015. From word embeddings to document distances. In Proceedings of ICML 2015, 957--966. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Liangda Li, Hongbo Deng, Anlei Dong, Yi Chang, and Hongyuan Zha. 2014. Identifying and labeling search tasks via query-based Hawkes processes. In Proceedingsof KDD 2014, 731--740. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Zhen Liao, Yang Song, Yalou Huang, Li-wei He, and Qi He. 2014. Task trail: An effective segmentation of user search behavior. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., Vol. 26, 12 (2014), 3090--3102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Zheng Lu, Hongyuan Zha, Xiaokang Yang, Weiyao Lin, and Zhaohui Zheng. 2013. A new algorithm for inferring user search goals with feedback sessions. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., Vol. 25, 3 (2013), 502--513. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Claudio Lucchese, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Gabriele Tolomei. 2011. Identifying task-based sessions in search engine query logs. In Proceedings of WSDM 2011, 277--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Claudio Lucchese, Salvatore Orlando, Raffaele Perego, Fabrizio Silvestri, and Gabriele Tolomei. 2013. Discovering tasks from search engine query logs. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., Vol. 31, 3 (2013), 14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Rishabh Mehrotra, Prasanta Bhattacharya, and Emine Yilmaz. 2016. Deconstructing complex search tasks: A Bayesian nonparametric approach for extracting sub-tasks. In Proceedings of NAACL 2016, 599--605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Rishabh Mehrotra and Emine Yilmaz. 2015. Terms, topics & tasks: Enhanced user modelling for better personalization. In Proceedings of ICTIR 2015, 131--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Rishabh Mehrotra and Emine Yilmaz. 2017a. Extracting hierarchies of search tasks & subtasks via a Bayesian nonparametric approach. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2017, 285--294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Rishabh Mehrotra and Emine Yilmaz. 2017b. Task embeddings: Learning query embeddings using task context. In Proceedings of CIKM 2017, 2199--2202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Donald Metzler, Susan T. Dumais, and Christopher Meek. 2007. Similarity measures for short segments of text. In Proceedings of ECIR 2007. 16--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv, Vol. abs/1301.3781 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Greg Pass, Abdur Chowdhury, and Cayley Torgeson. 2006. A picture of search. In Proceedings of Infoscale 2006, 1. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Procheta Sen, Debasis Ganguly, and Gareth J. F. Jones. 2018. Tempo-lexical context driven word embedding for cross-session search task extraction. In Proceedings of NAACL 2018. 283--292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Amanda Spink, Minsoo Park, Bernard J. Jansen, and Jan O. Pedersen. 2006. Multitasking during web search sessions. Inf. Process. Manage., Vol. 42, 1 (2006), 264--275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Manisha Verma and Emine Yilmaz. 2014. Entity oriented task extraction from query logs. Proceedings of CIKM 2014, 1975--1978. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Manisha Verma and Emine Yilmaz. 2016. Category oriented task extraction. In Proceedings of CHIIR 2016, 333--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zi Yang and Eric Nyberg. 2015. Leveraging procedural knowledge for task-oriented search. In Proceedings of SIGIR 2015, 513--522. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Query-Task Mapping

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
              July 2019
              1512 pages
              ISBN:9781450361729
              DOI:10.1145/3331184

              Copyright © 2019 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 18 July 2019

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Acceptance Rates

              SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate84of426submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader