skip to main content
10.1145/3331184.3331367acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Modeling Transferable Topics for Cross-Target Stance Detection

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Targeted stance detection aims to classify the attitude of an opinionated text towards a pre-defined target. Previous methods mainly focus on in-target setting that models are trained and tested using data specific to the same target. In practical cases, the target we concern may have few or no labeled data, which restrains us from training a target-specific model. In this paper we study the problem of cross-target stance detection, utilizing labeled data of a source target to learn models that can be adapted to a destination target. To this end, we propose an effective method, the core intuition of which is to leverage shared latent topics between two targets as transferable knowledge to facilitate model adaptation. Our method acquires topic knowledge with neural variational inference, and further adopts adversarial training that encourages the model to learn target-invariant representations. Experimental results verify that our proposed method is superior to the state-of-the-art methods.

References

  1. Isabelle Augenstein, Tim Rockt"aschel, Andreas Vlachos, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2016. Stance detection with bidirectional conditional encoding. In EMNLP .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research , Vol. 3, Jan (2003). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daniel Cohen, Bhaskar Mitra, Katja Hofmann, and W Bruce Croft. 2018. Cross domain regularization for neural ranking models using adversarial learning. In SIGIR . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. William Ferreira and Andreas Vlachos. 2016. Emergent: A novel data-set for stance classification. In NAACL-HLT .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Yaroslav Ganin and Victor Lempitsky. 2015. Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation. ICML . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Myungha Jang and James Allan. 2018. Explaining controversy on social media via stance summarization. In SIGIR . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Diederik P Kingma and Max Welling. 2014. Auto-encoding variational Bayes. In ICLR .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng Li, Xiaoxiao Guo, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2017. Deep memory networks for attitude identification. WSDM . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yishu Miao, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2017. Discovering discrete latent topics with neural variational inference. In ICML . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, Parinaz Sobhani, Xiao-Dan Zhu, and Colin Cherry. 2016. SemEval-2016 task 6: Detecting stance in tweets. SemEval .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitra Mohtarami, Ramy Baly, James Glass, Preslav Nakov, Llu'is Màrquez, and Alessandro Moschitti. 2018. Automatic stance detection using end-to-end memory networks. In NAACL-HLT .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Darsh J Shah, Tao Lei, Alessandro Moschitti, Salvatore Romeo, and Preslav Nakov. 2018. Adversarial domain adaptation for duplicate question detection. In EMNLP .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Swapna Somasundaran and Janyce Wiebe. 2010. Recognizing stances in ideological on-line debates. In NAACL-HLT Workshop on Computational Approaches to Analysis and Generation of Emotion in Text . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Akash Srivastava and Charles Sutton. 2017. Autoencoding variational inference for topic models. In ICLR .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Arthur Szlam, Jason Weston, and Rob Fergus. 2015. End-to-end memory networks. In NIPS . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018. FEVER: A Large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification. In NAACL-HLT .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Penghui Wei, Junjie Lin, and Wenji Mao. 2018. Multi-target stance detection via a dynamic memory-augmented network. In SIGIR . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Chang Xu, Cecile Paris, Surya Nepal, and Ross Sparks. 2018. Cross-target stance classification with self-attention networks. In ACL .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jichuan Zeng, Jing Li, Yan Song, Cuiyun Gao, Michael R Lyu, and Irwin King. 2018. Topic memory networks for short text classification. In EMNLP .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Modeling Transferable Topics for Cross-Target Stance Detection

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
        July 2019
        1512 pages
        ISBN:9781450361729
        DOI:10.1145/3331184

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 18 July 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • short-paper

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR'19 Paper Acceptance Rate84of426submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader