skip to main content
10.1145/3331453.3362045acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Completeness Assessment on Product Reviews based on User-concerned Information Requirements

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

More and more stakeholders such as consumers, sales clerks, manufacturers and administrative staffs are gravitated to wade through product reviews prior to making decisions, and they often try to get more helpful concerned information with a few reviews. However, the information items included in different reviews are often limited and different users often concern different aspects, and the existing research does not achieve the completeness assessment of reviews in the form of information items. Therefore, we identify the user-concerned information items from the reviews published or clicked by a user, and develop the assessment models to assess the completeness of reviews based on the identified information items, and finally show a method for ranking review with the requirements in information completeness.

References

  1. Ghose, A., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2011). Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23(10), 1498--1512.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Zhang, J. Q., Craciun, G., & Shin, D. (2010). When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews. Journal of Business Research, 63(12), 1336--1341.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Zhang, K. Z., Cheung, C. M., & Lee, M. K. (2014). Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers' online shopping decision. International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 89--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Park, S., & Nicolau, J. L. (2015). Asymmetric effects of online consumer reviews. Annals of Tourism Research, 50, 67--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Yan, Z., Xing, M., Zhang, D., & Ma, B. (2015). EXPRS: An extended pagerank method for product feature extraction from online consumer reviews. Information & Management, 52(7), 850--858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586--607.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Huang, A. H., Chen, K., Yen, D. C., & Tran, T. P. (2015). A study of factors that contribute to online review helpfulness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 17--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Pan, Y., & Zhang, J. Q. (2011). Born unequal: a study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. Journal of Retailing, 87(4), 598--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Li, M., Huang, L., Tan, C. H., & Wei, K. K. (2013). Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17(4), 101--136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Ngo-Ye, T. L., & Sinha, A. P. (2014). The influence of reviewer engagement characteristics on online review helpfulness: A text regression model. Decision Support Systems, 61, 47--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Khan, A., Baharudin, B., & Khan, K. (2011). Sentiment classification using sentence-level lexical based semantic orientation of online reviews. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 6(10), 1141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Kwon, O., Lee, N., & Shin, B. (2014). Data quality management, data usage experience and acquisition intention of big data analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 34(3), 387--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Sharma, R., Nigam, S., & Jain, R. (2014). Mining of product reviews at aspect level. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.3714.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Miao, Q., Li, Q., & Dai, R. (2009). AMAZING: A sentiment mining and retrieval system. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7192--7198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Crawford, M., Khoshgoftaar, T. M., Prusa, J. D., Richter, A. N., & Al Najada, H. (2015). Survey of review spam detection using machine learning techniques. Journal of Big Data, 2(1), 23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B., & Yu, P. S. (2012). Identify online store review spammers via social review graph. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(4), 61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived 'helpfulness' of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548--559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Asghar, M. Z., Khan, A., Ahmad, S., & Kundi, F. M. (2014). A review of feature extraction in sentiment analysis. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(3), 181--186.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Poria S, Cambria E, Ku L W, et al (2014). A rule-based approach to aspect extraction from product reviews[C]//Proceedings of the second workshop on natural language processing for social media (SocialNLP), 28--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Heydari, A., ali Tavakoli, M., Salim, N., & Heydari, Z. (2015). Detection of review spam: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(7), 3634--3642.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Decker, R., & Trusov, M. (2010). Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 293--307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ekinci, E., Türkmen, H., & Omurca, S. İ. (2017). Multi-word Aspect Term Extraction Using Turkish User Reviews. International Journal of Computer Engineering and Information Technology (IJCEIT), 9, 15--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Zha, Z. J., Yu, J., Tang, J., Wang, M., & Chua, T. S. (2014). Product aspect ranking and its applications. IEEE Transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 26(5), 1211--1224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Jeyapriya, A., & Selvi, C. K. (2015). Extracting aspects and mining opinions in product reviews using supervised learning algorithm. In Electronics and Communication Systems (ICECS), 2015-2nd International Conference on (pp. 548--552). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Yu, H. K., Zhang, H. P., Liu, Q., Lv, X. Q., & Shi, S. C. (2006). Chinese named entity identification using cascaded hidden Markov model. JOURNAL-CHINA INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATIONS, 27(2), 87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Fan W, Geerts F, Tang N, et al. Conflict resolution with data currency and consistency[J]. Journal of Data and Information Quality (JDIQ), 2014, 5(1-2), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Completeness Assessment on Product Reviews based on User-concerned Information Requirements

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      CSAE '19: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
      October 2019
      942 pages
      ISBN:9781450362948
      DOI:10.1145/3331453

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader