skip to main content
10.1145/3332165.3347923acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

BubBowl: Display Vessel Using Electrolysis Bubbles in Drinkable Beverages

Published:17 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research was conducted regarding a display that presents digital information using bubbles. Conventional bubble displays require moving parts, because it is common to use air taken from outside of the water to represent pixels. However, it is difficult to increase the number of pixels at a low cost. We propose a liquid-surface display using pixels of bubble clusters generated from electrolysis, and present the cup-type device BubBowl, which generates a 10×10 pixel dot matrix pattern on the surface of a beverage. Our technique requires neither a gas supply from the outside nor moving parts. Using the proposed electrolysis method, a higher-resolution display can easily be realized using a PCB with a higher density of matrix electrodes.Moreover, the method is simple and practical, and can be utilized in daily life, such as for presenting information using bubbles on the surface of coffee in a cup.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

ufp6742pv.mp4

mp4

16.2 MB

ufp6742vf.mp4

mp4

69.5 MB

p619-ishii.mp4

mp4

229.8 MB

References

  1. Andrew Dahley, Craig Wisneski, and Hiroshi Ishii. 1998. Water Lamp and Pinwheels: Ambient Projection of Digital Information into Architectural Space. In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 269--270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/286498.286750Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Jeremy M. Heiner, Scott E. Hudson, and Kenichiro Tanaka. 1999. The Information Percolator: Ambient Information Display in a Decorative Object. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '99). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 141--148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/320719.322595Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Shiho Hirayama and Yasuaki Kakehi. 2010. Shaboned Display: An Interactive Substantial Display Using Soap Bubbles. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2010 Emerging Technologies (SIGGRAPH '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 21, 1 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1836821.1836842Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hiroshi Ishii, Craig Wisneski, Scott Brave, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. ambientROOM: Integrating Ambient Media with Architectural Space. In CHI 98 Conference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '98). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 173--174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/286498.286652Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Takaki Kimura and Yasuaki Kakehi. 2014. MOSS-xels: Slow Changing Pixels Using the Shape of Racomitrium Canescens. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2014 Posters (SIGGRAPH '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 1 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2614217.2630572Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Yuki Kubo, Hirobumi Tomita, Shuta Nakamae, Takayuki Hoshi, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2016. Bubble Cloud: Projection of an Image Onto a Bubble Cluster. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 41, 4 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3001773.3001815Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Kota Kumagai, Satoshi Hasegawa, and Yoshio Hayasaki. 2017. Volumetric bubble display. Optica 4, 3 (2017), 298--302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000298Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Masahiro Nakamura, Go Inaba, Jun Tamaoki, Kazuhito Shiratori, and Junichi Hoshino. 2006. Mounting and Application of Bubble Display System: Bubble Cosmos. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178879Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Amanda Parkes and Dietmar Offenhuber. 2007. Dewy: A Condensation Display. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 Posters (SIGGRAPH '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1280720.1280769Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Deepak Ranjan Sahoo, Timothy Neate, Yutaka Tokuda, Jennifer Pearson, Simon Robinson, Sriram Subramanian, and Matt Jones. 2018. Tangible Drops: A Visio-Tactile Display Using Actuated Liquid-Metal Droplets. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 177, 14 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173751Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sue Ann Seah, Diego Martinez Plasencia, Peter D. Bennett, Abhijit Karnik, Vlad Stefan Otrocol, Jarrod Knibbe, Andy Cockburn, and Sriram Subramanian. 2014. SensaBubble: A Chrono-sensory Mid-air Display of Sight and Smell. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2863--2872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557087Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Yuki Tsujimoto, Yuichi Itoh, and Takao Onoye. 2016. Ketsuro-Graffiti: An Interactive Display with Water Condensation. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces (ISS '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2992154.2992159Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Udayan Umapathi, Patrick Shin, Ken Nakagaki, Daniel Leithinger, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2018. Programmable Droplets for Interaction. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article VS15, 1 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3186607Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Akira Wakita and Midori Shibutani. 2006. Mosaic Textile: Wearable Ambient Display with Non-emissive Color-changing Modules. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1178823.1178880Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Craig Wisneski, Hiroshi Ishii, Andrew Dahley, Matt Gorbet, Scott Brave, Brygg Ullmer, and Paul Yarin. 1998. Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In Proceedings of Cooperative Buildings: Integrating Information, Organization, and Architecture (CoBuild 1998). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 22--32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3--540--69706--3_4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. BubBowl: Display Vessel Using Electrolysis Bubbles in Drinkable Beverages

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '19: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
      October 2019
      1229 pages
      ISBN:9781450368162
      DOI:10.1145/3332165

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader