skip to main content
10.1145/3332167.3357115acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Stick User Interface

Published:14 October 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a novel device called the "Stick User Interface", comprised of a robotic projector-camera system, an onboard digital computer connected to the Internet, sensors, and a hardware interface capable of sticking to any surface such as walls, ceilings, etc. The computer further consists of other subsystems, devices, and sensors such as an accelerometer, compass, gyroscope, flashlight, etc. The device unfolds (expands) on activation, detects a surface, and attaches itself to it. After a successful attachment, the device then projects or augments images, information, and user interfaces on nearby surfaces and walls. The user interface may contain applications, information about the object being augmented, and information from the Internet. Users can interact with the user-interface using commands and gestures such as hand, body, feet, voice, etc.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

upp1070.mp4

mp4

14.5 MB

upp1070pv.mp4

mp4

14.5 MB

References

  1. Electroadhesion (Retreived on Jul 9 2019). https://www.sri.com/engage/products-solutions/electroadhesionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Keecker. https://www.keecker.com/us-en/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hrvoje Benko, Andrew D. Wilson, and Federico Zannier. 2014. Dyadic Projected Spatial Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 645--655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647402Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Oliver Bimber, Daisuke Iwai, Gordon Wetzstein, and Anselm Grundhöfer. 2008. The Visual Computing of Projector-camera Systems. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2008 Classes (SIGGRAPH '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 84, 25 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1401132.1401239Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Matthew Flagg and James M. Rehg. 2006. Projector-guided Painting. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '06). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 235--244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1166253.1166290Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Jan Gugenheimer, Pascal Knierim, Julian Seifert, and Enrico Rukzio. 2014. UbiBeam: An Interactive Projector-Camera System for Domestic Deployment. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305--310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2669485.2669537Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Thuong Hoang, Martin Reinoso, Zaher Joukhadar, Frank Vetere, and David Kelly. 2017. Augmented Studio: Projection Mapping on Moving Body for Physiotherapy Education. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1419--1430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025860Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hiroshi Kawasaki, Inose Kenji, Toshihiro Kawasaki, Ryo Furukawa, Ryusuke Sagawa, and Yasushi Yagi. 2008. Projector Camera System for Realtime 3D Scanning. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE International Workshop on Projector Camera Systems (PROCAMS '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 9, 2 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1394622.1394634Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Natan Linder and Pattie Maes. 2012. The Design Evolution of LuminAR: A Compact and Kinetic Projected Augmented Reality Interface. In CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1435--1436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212776.2212473Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Pranav Mistry and Pattie Maes. 2009. SixthSense: A Wearable Gestural Interface. In ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2009 Sketches (SIGGRAPH ASIA '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 1 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1667146.1667160Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. David Molyneaux, Hans Gellersen, Gerd Kortuem, and Bernt Schiele. 2007. Cooperative Augmentation of Smart Objects with Projector-camera Systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '07). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 501--518. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1771592.1771621Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Satoshi Murata and Kaori Fujinami. 2011. A Stabilization Method of Projected Images for Wearable Projector Applications. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 469--470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030175Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jürgen Scheible, Achim Hoth, Julian Saal, and Haifeng Su. 2013. Displaydrone: A Flying Robot Based Interactive Display. In Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (PerDis '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 49--54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pramod Verma. 2016. Flying User Interface. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '16 Adjunct). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 203--204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2984751.2984770Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Karl D.D. Willis, Ivan Poupyrev, Scott Hudson, and Moshe Mahler. 2012. SideBySide: Multi-user Gestural Interaction with Handheld Projectors. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Companion (MobileHCI '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 203--206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2371664.2371710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Andrew Wilson, Hrvoje Benko, Shahram Izadi, and Otmar Hilliges. 2012. Steerable Augmented Reality with the Beamatron. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 413--422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380169Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Andrew D. Wilson and Hrvoje Benko. 2017. Holograms Without Headsets: Projected Augmented Reality with the RoomAlive Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 425--428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3027063.3050433Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Ji Zhao, Hujia Liu, Chunhui Zhang, and Zhengyou Zhang. 2010. MobileSurface: Interaction in the Air for Mobile Computing. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 23Nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 459--460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1866218.1866270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Stick User Interface

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      UIST '19 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology
      October 2019
      192 pages
      ISBN:9781450368179
      DOI:10.1145/3332167

      Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 14 October 2019

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

      Upcoming Conference

      UIST '24
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)26
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader