skip to main content
10.1145/3332186.3333266acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespearcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Spatial Data Decomposition and Load Balancing on HPC Platforms

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

We are in the era of Spatial Big Data. Due to the developments of topographic techniques, clear satellite imagery, and various means for collecting information, geospatial datasets are growing in volume, complexity and heterogeneity. For example, OpenStreetMap data for the whole world is about 1 TB and NASA world climate datasets are about 17 TB. Spatial data volume and variety makes spatial computations both data-intensive and compute-intensive. Due to the irregular distribution of spatial data, domain decomposition becomes challenging. In this work, we present spatial data partitioning technique that takes into account spatial join cost. In addition, we present spatial join computation using Asynchronous Dynamic Load Balancing (ADLB) library. ADLB is a software library designed to help rapidly build scalable parallel programs using MPI. We evaluated the performance of ADLB-based MPI-GIS implementation. In our existing work, spatial data movement cost from ADLB server to worker MPI processes limited the scalability of MPI-GIS.

References

  1. {n. d.}. SpatialHadoop, http://spatialhadoop.cs.umn.edu. Website. ({n. d.}). http://spatialhadoop.cs.umn.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Dinesh Agarwal, Satish Puri, Xi He, and Sushil K Prasad. 2012. A system for GIS polygonal overlay computation on linux cluster-an experience and performance report. In 2012 IEEE 26th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium Workshops & PhD Forum. IEEE, 1433--1439. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ewing L Lusk, Steve C Pieper, Ralph M Butler, et al. 2010. More scalability, less pain: A simple programming model and its implementation for extreme computing. SciDAC Review 17, 1 (2010), 30--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Satish Puri. 2019. SpatialMPI: Message Passing Interface for GIS Applications. Geographic Information Science & Technology Body of Knowledge 2019, Q2 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Satish Puri, Anmol Paudel, and Sushil K Prasad. 2018. MPI-Vector-IO: Parallel I/O and Partitioning for Geospatial Vector Data. In Proceedings of the 47th International Conference on Parallel Processing, ICPP. 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Satish Puri and Sushil K Prasad. 2015. A parallel algorithm for clipping polygons with improved bounds and a distributed overlay processing system using mpi. In 2015 15th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster, Cloud and Grid Computing. IEEE, 576--585. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Spatial Data Decomposition and Load Balancing on HPC Platforms

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        PEARC '19: Proceedings of the Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing on Rise of the Machines (learning)
        July 2019
        775 pages
        ISBN:9781450372275
        DOI:10.1145/3332186
        • General Chair:
        • Tom Furlani

        Copyright © 2019 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 July 2019

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate133of202submissions,66%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader