skip to main content
10.1145/3332324.3332326acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicemcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Outlining a New Approach to Study Mobile Marketing: Relevancy as a Primary Mediating Construct to Understand Mobile Advertising Effectiveness

Published:22 May 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mobile Marketing is a relatively new field. Many articles attempt to understand, define, encapsulate, find best practices, and describe marketing use applications on mobile devices. A significant part of the research on mobile marketing and mobile advertising focuses on the technology or functionality perspective, i.e., QR Codes, MMS and SMS, APPS, and Smart Tags/Proximity technology implementations, User Interface, and Payments to name a few. Researchers try to understand how consumers' attitudes are formed and influenced by Mobile Marketing, in many cases using models that studied technology acceptance (TAM, UTAUT, etc.). The authors contend that there is a critical misconception in the study of Mobile Marketing. It is argued here that different from extant research, "mobile" in the context of "mobile marketing" is not a technology, it is a medium. That medium can be highly customized, even considered as a one to one conversation. Consequently, different from current research, it is claimed here that consumer intention, acceptance, and redemption of mobile offers are affected directly not by technological, situational, or contextual factors, but through a primary mediating construct: Relevancy or "Agent R". Drawing concepts from the Relevance Theory we offer a new perspective on how to study the effects of mobile advertising on consumer behavior; opening a new field of study, that will focus on how to enhance the "Agent R" construct. We theorize that previously studied factors that affect mobile consumer's behavior are antecedents of the "Agent R" and that without relevancy all those factors are immaterial. This change of paradigm on the investigation of mobile advertising will have direct practical consequences too. The Holy Grail of marketers will be to find ways to win the relevance game, enhancing immediate customer value and improving return on advertising expenditures.

References

  1. Poushter, J. Smartphone ownership and Internet usage continues to climb in emerging economies. Pew Research Center (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Weiser, M. The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American, 265, 3 (1991), 94--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. McGuigan, L. and Manzerolle, V. "All the world'sa shopping cart": Theorizing the political economy of ubiquitous media and markets. new media & society, 17, 11 (2015), 1830--1848.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee, S. and Yancey, S. Enhancing mobile coupon redemption in fast food campaigns. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 4, 2 (2010 2011-06-15 2010), 97--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bart, Y., Stephen, A. T. and Sarvary, M. Which Products Are Best Suited to Mobile Advertising? A Field Study of Mobile Display Advertising Effects on Consumer Attitudes and Intentions. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 3 (Jun 2014 2014-06-27 2014), 270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Wang, X., Wu, D. and Teo, H. H. Right Message at Right Place: Investigating the Effectiveness of Location-based Mobile Advertising on Consumers' Redemption Responses. In Proceedings of the Thirty Fifth International Conference on Information Systems ( Auckland, 2014), {insert City of Publication},{insert 2014 of Publication}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Danaher, P. J., Smith, M. S., Ranasinghe, K. and Danaher, T. S. Where, when, and how long: Factors that influence the redemption of mobile phone coupons. Journal of Marketing Research, 52, 5 (2015), 710--725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly (1989), 319--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Bagozzi, R. P. The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8, 4 (2007), 244--254.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Wu, J.-H. and Wang, S.-C. What drives mobile commerce?: An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & management, 42, 5 (2005), 719--729. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Moon, J.-W. and Kim, Y.-G. Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & management, 38, 4 (2001), 217--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Hsu, C.-L. and Lu, H.-P. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & management, 41, 7 (2004), 853--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shih, H.-P. Extended technology acceptance model of Internet utilization behavior. Information & Management, 41, 6 (2004), 719--729.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46, 2 (2000), 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Venkatesh, V. and Bala, H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision sciences, 39, 2 (2008), 273--315.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L. and Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36, 1 (Mar 2012 2012-03-08 2012), 157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Carlsson, C., Carlsson, J., Hyvonen, K., Puhakainen, J. and Walden, P. Adoption of mobile devices/services-searching for answers with the UTAUT. IEEE, City, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Wu, Y.-L., Tao, Y.-H. and Yang, P.-C. Using UTAUT to explore the behavior of 3G mobile communication users. IEEE, City, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Shin, D.-H. Towards an understanding of the consumer acceptance of mobile wallet. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 6 (2009), 1343--1354. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Yu, C.-S. Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 2 (2012), 104--121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou, T., Lu, Y. and Wang, B. Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 4 (2010), 760--767. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Alkhunaizan, A. and Love, S. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised UTAUT model. International Journal of Management and Marketing Academy, 2, 1 (2012), 82--99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaradat, M.-I. R. M. and Al Rababaa, M. S. Assessing key factor that influence on the acceptance of mobile commerce based on modified UTAUT. International Journal of Business and Management, 8, 23 (2013), p102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang, K. and Forney, J. C. The moderating role of consumer technology anxiety in mobile shopping adoption: differential effects of facilitating conditions and social influences. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 14, 4 (2013 2013-12-21 2013), 334--347.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Springer, City, 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Celsi, R. L. and Olson, J. C. The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 2 (1988), 210--224.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Chiagouris, L. and Mohr, I. An evaluation of the effectiveness of Internet advertising tools. Journal of Internet Commerce, 3, 3 (2004), 41--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Campbell, D. E. and Wright, R. T. SHUT-UP I DON'T CARE: UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF RELEVANCE AND INTERACTIVITY ON CUSTOMER ATTITUDES TOWARD REPETITIVE ONLINE ADVERTISING. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 9, 1 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Wilson, D. and Sperber, D. Relevance theory. Blackwell, City, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Byrne, B. Relevance Theory and the Language of Advertising. CLS Occasional Paper No. 31. 0332--3889, Trinity Coll, Dublin Centre for Language Communication, Studies, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Díaz Pérez, F. J. Sperber and Wilson's Relevance Theory and its applicability to advertising discourse: Evidence from British press advertisements. City, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhaohui, X. and Yanchun, Z. Relevance Theory and Its Application to Advertising Interpretation. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 3, 3 (03// 2013), 492--496.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Infantidou, E. Multimodality and relevance in the Athens 2004 Olympic Games televised promotion. City, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Djafarova, E. Why do advertisers use visual metaphors? A pragmatic perspective. Marketing Review, 16, 2 (Summer 2016-2016), 203--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Rauen, F. J. Teoria da relevância e análise sociorretórica de gêneros textuais: análise de correlações entre chamadas de capa e respectivos textos chamados. Relevance theory and socio-rhetorical analysis of genres: analysis ofcorrelations between headlines and headlined texts., 9, 1 (2012), 68--82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Djafarova, E. and Waring, T. LANGUAGE OF TOURISM ADVERTISING: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH. Tourism Analysis, 17, 2 (2012), 233--237.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Schramm, W. L. e. Process and effects of mass communication. Univ. of Ill. press, 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. MMA, M. M. A.-. MMA updates definition of Mobile Marketing. City, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Merisavo, M., Kajalo, S., Karjaluoto, H., Virtanen, V., Salmenkivi, S., Raulas, M. and Leppäniemi, M. An empirical study of the drivers of consumer acceptance of mobile advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7, 2 (2007), 41--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. José Martí, P., Sanz-Blas, S., Ruiz-Mafé, C. and Aldás-Manzano, J. Key factors of teenagers' mobile advertising acceptance. Industrial Management + Data Systems, 113, 5 (2013 2013-09-09 2013), 732--749.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35, 8 (1989), 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Bagozzi, R. P. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the association for information systems, 8, 4 (2007), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Sperber, D. A. N., Wilson, D. and Wilson, D. Relevance Theory. Blackwell Publishers, City, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Basheer, A. M. A.-a. and Ibrahim, A. M. A. Mobile Marketing: Examining the impact of trust, privacy concern and consumers' attitudes on intention to purchase. International Journal of Business and Management, 5, 3 (Mar 2010 2012-09-12 2010), 28--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Du, P. Factors influencing consumers' acceptance of mobile marketing: an empirical study of the Chinese youth market. International Journal of China Marketing, 2, 2 (May 2012 2012-09-17 2012), 24--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Tang, H., Liao, S. S. and Sun, S. X. A prediction framework based on contextual data to support Mobile Personalized Marketing. Decision Support Systems, 56 (Dec 2013 2013-12-11 2013), 234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Banerjee, S. and Dholakia, R. R. Mobile advertising: does location-based advertising work? International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 3, 2 (2008), 68--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Varnali, K., Yilmaz, C. and Toker, A. Predictors of attitudinal and behavioral outcomes in mobile advertising: A field experiment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 6 (Nov/Dec Nov/Dec 2012 2014-08-28 2012), 570--581.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Zaichkowsky, J. L. The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of advertising, 23, 4 (1994), 59--70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Zaichkowsky, J. L. Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of consumer research, 12, 3 (1985), 341--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Cengiz, E. and Tetik, H. Consumer attitudes toward permission-based mobile marketing: an empirical study for turkey. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 5, 2 (2010), 102--113.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsang, M. M., Shu-Chun, H. and Ting-Peng, L. Consumer atitudes toward mobile advertising: an empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 3 (Spring 2004-2004), 65--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Mirusmonov, M. C., Kim, C. and Jung, J. J. An empirical study of factors driving to M-shopping usage. The Business Review, Cambridge, 22, 1 (Summer Summer 2014 2014-05-27 2014), 182--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Im, H. and Young, H. Who are the users of mobile coupons? A profile of US consumers. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6, 3 (2012 2013-01-29 2012), 215--232.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Schilit, B. N. and Theimer, M. M. Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. Network, IEEE, 8, 5 (1994), 22--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Dey, A. K., Abowd, G. D. and Salber, D. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16, 2 (2001), 97--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Spiekermann, S., Rothensee, M. and Klafft, M. Street marketing: how proximity and context drive coupon redemption. The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28, 4 (2011 2011-10-05 2011), 280--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Chinomona, R. and Sandada, M. The influence of market related mobile activities on the acceptance of mobile marketing and consumer intention to purchase products promoted by SMS in South Africa. Journal of Applied Business Research, 29, 6 (Nov/Dec Nov/Dec 2013 2014-03-07 2013), 1897-n/a.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Spaid, B. I. and Flint, D. J. The meaning of shopping experiences augmented by mobile internet devices. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 22, 1 (Winter Winter 2014 2014-01-17 2014), 73--89.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Bamba, F. and Barnes, S. J. SMS advertising, permission and the consumer: a study. Business Process Management Journal, 13, 6 (2007 2014-08-15 2007), 815--829.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Okazaki, S., Katsukura, A. and Nishiyama, M. How Mobile Advertising works: the role of trust in improving attitudes and recall. Journal of Advertising Research, 47, 2 (2007), 165--178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Okazaki, S., Navarro-Bailón, M. Á. and Molina-Castillo, F.-J. Privacy concerns in Quick Response Code mobile promotion: the role of social anxiety and situational involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16, 4 (Summer 2012-2012), 91--120. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. Díaz, B. B., Mesías, J. F. T. and Serna, D. C. ACEPTACIÓN TECNOLÓGICA DE LA PUBLICIDAD EN DISPOSITIVOS MÓVILES EN COLOMBIA*. Semestre Económico, 17, 36 (Jul-Dec 2014 2016-04-27 2014), 133--153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Fang, Z., Yang, Y., Ren, Y. D. and Cai, J. Application of Wireless Location Technology in Advertising. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 268--270 (Dec 2012 2013-11-27 2012), 1805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Jong-Hyuok, J., Somerstein, R. and Eun Seon, K. SHOULD I SCAN OR SHOULD I GO?: YOUNG CONSUMERS' MOTIVATIONS FOR SCANNING QR CODE ADVERTISING. International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 7, 3 (Winter 2012-2012), 25--37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryu, J. S. and Murdock, K. Consumer acceptance of mobile marketing communications using the QR code. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 15, 2 (Oct/Dec Oct/Dec 2013 2014-05-28 2013), 111--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Davis, R., Sajtos, L. and Chaudhri, A. A. Do consumers trust mobile service advertising? Contemporary Management Research, 7, 4 (Dec 2011 2011-12-27 2011), 245--269.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Kavassalis, P., Spyropoulou, N., Drossos, D., Mitrokostas, E., Gikas, G. and Hatzistamatiou, A. Mobile permission marketing: framing the market inquiry. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 1 (2003), 55--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  70. Yousif, R. O. Factors affecting consumer attitudes towards mobile marketing. Journal of Database Marketing & Customer Strategy Management, 19, 3 (Sep 2012 2012-11-26 2012), 147--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Nokia New Nokia research shows consumers ready for m-marketing via mobile handsets. City, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Bauer, H. H., Barnes, S. J., Reichardt, T. and Neumann, M. M. Driving consumer acceptance of mobile marketing: A theoretical framework and empirical study. Journal of electronic commerce research, 6, 3 (2005), 181--192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Outlining a New Approach to Study Mobile Marketing: Relevancy as a Primary Mediating Construct to Understand Mobile Advertising Effectiveness

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICEMC '19: Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on E-business and Mobile Commerce
      May 2019
      90 pages
      ISBN:9781450371827
      DOI:10.1145/3332324

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 May 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader