Wei-Hsi Hung
ABSTRACT
Industry 4.0 can use production data and integrated information to make a production line perform dynamically and flexibly. Industry 4.0 can also make information be circulated easily and enable managers to make decisions more accurately and rapidly. The production process can be accelerated by those benefits. However, manufacturers do not have complete transformation strategies for Industry 4.0 yet. This study tries to find out the key success factors of Industry 4.0 from the cases of European manufacturing enterprises. The development histories of Siemens, Asea Brown Boveri (ABB) and Schneider electrics were analyzed through multiple cases comparisons. The same and different factors were compared to find out the key success factors of industry 4.0 development through thematic analysis. The key success factors of industry 4.0 identified is helpful for guiding the development strategy and transformation plan for other companies in the future.
- Agarwal, N. and Brem, A. 2015. Strategic business transformation through technology convergence: Implications from General Electric's industrial internet initiative. International Journal of Technology Management, 67(2/3/4), 196--214.Google Scholar
- Aaker, D.A. 1984. Strategic Market Management, New York: Humanities.Google Scholar
- Bartodziej, C.J. 2017. The Concept Industry 4.0: An Empirical Analysis of Technologies and Applications in Production Logistics. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln Y.S. 2005. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed), CA: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt K.M. 1989. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review Vol.14, No.4: 532--550.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Executive Yuan. 2015. Productivity Development Plan. Taiwan: Executive Yuan.Google Scholar
- Franke, N. and Martin S. 2008. Product Uniqueness as A Driver of Customer Utility in Mass Customization, Marketing Letters, 19(2), 93--107.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Garbuzova-Schlifter M, Madlener R. 2016. AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia. Energy Policy, 97, 559--581.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hollender, M., Graven, T. G., Partini, J., & Schäring, P. 2017. Process operation 4.0: Collaborative operations in highly integrated work environments. Atp edition, 1--7.Google Scholar
- Lee, J., Bagheri, B., & Kao, H. A. 2015. A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3(1), 18--23.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lee, J. 2016. Industrial big data: Transition of wisdom and value innovation in the era of Industry 4.0. CommnWealth, Taipei City, TaiwanGoogle Scholar
- Lu, Y. 2017. Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 6, 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leidecker, J.K., and Bruno A.V. (1984). Identifying and Using critical Success Factor. Long Range Planning, 17(1): 23--32.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohd, A. K. B., Mohd, F. O., Nor, H. N. A., & Muhamad, F. T. 2016. Industry 4.0: a review on industrial automation and robotic. Jurnal Teknologi, 78: 6--13 (2016) 137--143.Google Scholar
- Peres, R. S., Rocha, A. D., Leitao, P., & Barata, J. 2018. IDARTS-Towards intelligent data analysis and real-time supervision for industry 4.0. Computers in Industry, 101, 138--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Qin, J., Liu, Y., & Grosvenor, R. 2016. A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia Cirp, 52, 173--178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rockart, J. F. and Bullen, C. V. 1981. A Primer on Critical Success Factors. published in The Rise of Managerial Computing: The Best of the Center for Information Systems Research edited with Christine V. Bullen. (Homewood, IL: Dow Jones-Irwin)Google Scholar
- Stock, T. & Seliger, G. 2016. Opportunities of Sustainable Manufacturing in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 40, 536--541.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tillett, B.B.1989. Considerations for Authority Control in the Online Environment. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 9(3), 1--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Theorin, A., Bengtsson, K., Provost, J., Lieder, M., Johnsson, C., Lundholm, T., & Lennartson, B. 2017. An event-driven manufacturing information system architecture for Industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1297--1311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T. 2017. Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industry 4.0: A Review. Engineering, 3(5), 616--630.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Analysis of Key Success Factors for Industry 4.0 Development
Recommendations
Drivers and Barriers of Industry 4.0 Adoption in Indonesian Manufacturing Industry
APCORISE '20: Proceedings of the 3rd Asia Pacific Conference on Research in Industrial and Systems EngineeringIndustry 4.0, the fourth revolution Industry, has become a global trend in the manufacturing industry because it is able to produce a "smart factory" with cyber-physical systems (CPS). CPS integrate the physical world with digital by monitoring physical ...
Analysis of Industry 4.0 challenges using best worst method: A case study
Highlights- 36 Industry 4.0 challenges pertaining to automotive sector are identified.
- Best ...
AbstractAs manufacturing organizations are in need to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies, analysis of challenges is essential. Industry 4.0 is relatively new to the developing nations particularly India and requires in-depth knowledge about its ...
Augmented reality in support of Industry 4.0—Implementation challenges and success factors
Highlights- Augmented reality (AR) is a central part of Industry 4.0 or similar initiatives.
AbstractIndustrial augmented reality (AR) is an integral part of Industry 4.0 concepts, as it enables workers to access digital information and overlay that information with the physical world. While not being broadly adopted in some ...
Comments