skip to main content
10.1145/3333165.3333167acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesarabwicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Inter Blockchain Communication: A Survey

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Blockchain technology is growing massively where the number of blockchain platforms and decentralized applications are increasing rapidly in the last years. However, most of the existing blockchain networks are operating in a standalone environment isolated from each other, which increases scalability and connectivity issues in the current blockchain platforms as well as limiting the blockchain adoption in industry ecosystems. In the current phase, different blockchain networks don't have mutual trust where they cannot interact with each other and their capacity level has only reached a level similar to LAN. Due to the high barriers between the independent isolated blockchain platforms, researchers have started to focus on the concept of Blockchain interoperability. Blockchain interoperability is the ability of connecting multiple blockchain networks together, which significantly increases and solves scalability and connectivity issues in the blockchain platforms. Given the potential of blockchain interoperability and cross blockchain communication, many researchers are working on finding the optimal cross blockchain communication solution. As blockchain interoperability is emerging as an essential blockchain feature, the number of proposed blockchain interoperability solutions have been increasing within the last few years. In this paper, a survey of all the available cross blockchain communication solutions are discussed with a comparison of the proposed architectures.

References

  1. D. Yaga et al., "Blockchain Technology Overview," NIST Draft NISTIR 8202, January 2018, available on https://csrc.nist.gov,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Buterin, "R3 Reports Chain Interoperability," R3 Res., 2016. (chain Intrabobality)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Back et al., "Sidechains," pp. 1--25, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. B. Sergio and D. Lerner, "RSK," 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. S. Shapiro et al., "Alpha Networks," no. April, pp. 1--40, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. J. Poon and V. Buterin, "Plasma: Scalable Autonomous Smart Contracts Scalable Multi-Party Computation," pp. 1--47, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. "POA Network."{Online}. Available: https://poa.network {Accessed: 08-Sep-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Poelstra, "Mimblewimble," vol. 06, pp. 1--19, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. "Drivechain."{Online}. Available: http://www.truthcoin.info/blog/drivechain/ {Accessed: 20-Sep-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H. Wang, Y. Cen, and X. Li, "Blockchain Router: A Cross-Chain Communication Protocol," Proc. 6th Int. Conf. Informatics, Environ. Energy Appl. - IEEA '17, pp. 94--97, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Kan, Y. Wei, A. Hafiz Muhammad, W. Siyuan, G. Linchao, and H. Kai, "A Multiple Blockchains Architecture on Inter-Blockchain Communication," Proc. - 2018 IEEE 18th Int. Conf. Softw. Qual. Reliab. Secur. Companion, QRS-C 2018, pp. 139--145, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Z. Tech, "Anlink Blockchain Network," 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Ding, "InterChain: A Framework to Support Blockchain Interoperability."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Z. CHEN, Z. YU, Z. DUAN, and K. HU, "Inter-Blockchain Communication," DEStech Trans. Comput. Sci. Eng., vol. 0, no. cst, pp. 448--454, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. W. Li, A. Sforzin, S. Fedorov, and G. O. Karame, "Towards Scalable and Private Industrial Blockchains," Proc. ACM Work. Blockchain, Cryptocurrencies Contract. - BCC '17, pp. 9--14, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. G. G. Dagher, C. L. Adhikari, and T. Enderson, "Towards Secure Interoperability between Heterogeneous Blockchains using Smart Contracts," no. November, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. P. Bennink et al., "An Analysis of Atomic Swaps on and between Ethereum Blockchains using Smart Contracts," 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. "Cosmos."{Online}. Available: https://cosmos.network/docs/resources/whitepaper.html {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. W. Gavin, "Polkadot: vision for a heterogeneous multi-chain framework," pp. 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. "ICON," {Online}. Available: https://www.iconpartners.io {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. "AION," {Online}. Available: https://aion.network {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. "Wanchain." {Online}. Available: https://wanchain.org {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. A. Culwick and D. Metcalf, "THE BLOCKNET DESIGN SPECIFICATION."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. S. Thomas and E. Schwartz, "A Protocol for Interledger Payments."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. "ARK Whitepaper." {Online}. Available: https://ark.io {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. "Hyperledger Quilt."{Online}. Available: https://www.hyperledger.org/projects/quilt {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. "Metronome."{Online}. Available: https://www.metronome.io {Accessed: 22-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. "Block Collider," {Online}. Available: https://www.blockcollider.org {Accessed: 10-Aug-2018}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Inter Blockchain Communication: A Survey

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ArabWIC 2019: Proceedings of the ArabWIC 6th Annual International Conference Research Track
      March 2019
      136 pages
      ISBN:9781450360890
      DOI:10.1145/3333165

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ArabWIC 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%Overall Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader