skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3375211acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract
Public Access

Tele-robotic Interface Design in Context: A Case for Recursive Design

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Satellites have useful lifetimes of only a few decades; however, these could easily be extended if consumable resources could be replaced. Many groups are now exploring the possibility of using unmanned orbital robots to perform satellite servicing operations. These orbiting robots are currently semi-autonomous and require monitoring and control by highly trained ground teams in order to complete their activities. This provides for a unique and tightly constrained operating environment with very particular interface needs. Here, we document the process we used for developing a tele-robotic interface specific to NASA's Restore-L mission, and describe the choices and considerations we weighed when implementing our designs. We discuss the technical and mission parameters as well as the social and operational context of our work, and articulate the need for a design framework that is capable of better connecting these two domains.

References

  1. B. A. Nardi, "Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction.," Cambridge, MA: MIT Press., 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. V. Kaptelinin and B. Nardi, "Activity theory in a nutshell," Act. with Technol. Act. theory Interact. Des., no. 1978, pp. 29--73, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. Suchman, Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. E. Hutchins, Cognition in the Wild (Bradford Books). The MIT Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. A. Halverson, "Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition?: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories," Design, pp. 243--267, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. K. Beck, M. Beedle, A. Bennekum, A. Cockburn, W. Cunningham, M. Fowler, J. Grenning, J. Highsmith, A. Hunt, R. Jeffries, J. Kern, B. Marick, R. C. Martin, S. Mellor, K. Schwaber, J. Sutherland, and D. Thomas, "Manifesto for Agile Software Development," The Agile Alliance, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Paelke and K. Nebe, "Integrating agile methods for mixed reality design space exploration," Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Des. Interact. Syst. - DIS '08, pp. 240--249, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. E. Hutchins, "How a cockpit remembers its speeds," Cogn. Sci., 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. K. J. Vicente and J. Rasmussen, "Ecological Interface Design: Theoretical Foundations," IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 589-- 606, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. C. Mcilroy and N. A. Stanton, "Ecological Interface Design Two Decades On?: Whatever Happened to the SRK Taxonomy," vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 145--163, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. C. M. Burns and J. R. Hajdukiewicz, Ecological interface design. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Tele-robotic Interface Design in Context: A Case for Recursive Design

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2020
        4474 pages
        ISBN:9781450368193
        DOI:10.1145/3334480

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 April 2020

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • extended-abstract

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format