ABSTRACT
Play and playfulness permeate our daily lives and are often the target of interaction designers. Yet, designing for play while embracing the idiosyncrasies of users and their contexts is challenging. Here we address recent calls for new situated and emergent play design methods by turning to social media, which is currently a source of inspiration for arts, crafts, fashion, and more. We present @chasing.play: An exploration of how Instagram may help designers capture and share instances of mundane playful engagement to inspire play design. We report on the findings of a pilot study where we experimented with the tool, and raise a challenges and open questions we plan to address in the future. Our work can trigger discussions among researchers about the potential of social media as a design tool and inspire action towards collectively defining strategies to leverage that potential.
- Chadia Abras, Diane Maloney-Krichmar, and Jenny Preece. 2004. User-centered design. Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 37(4), 445456.Google Scholar
- Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Elena Márquez Segura, Jared Duval, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Chasing Play Potentials: Towards an Increasingly Situated and Emergent Approach to Everyday Play Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1265--1277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322325Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Elena Márquez Segura, Jared Duval, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Designing for Play that Permeates Everyday Life: Towards New Methods for Situated Play Design. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (HTTF 2019), Joel E Fischer, Sarah Martindale, Martin Porcheron, Stuart Reeves, and Jocelyn Spence (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 4 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363400Google ScholarDigital Library
- Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, 388--397.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simon Clatworthy, Robin Oorschot, and Berit Lindquister. 2014. How to get a leader to talk: Tangible objects for strategic conversations in service design. In ServDes. 2014 Service Future; Proceedings of the fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference; Lancaster University; United Kingdom; 9--11 April 2014. Linköping University Electronic Press, 270--280.Google Scholar
- Andrew Crabtree, Mark Rouncefield, and Peter Tolmie. 2012. Doing design ethnography. Springer.Google Scholar
- Ella Dagan, Elena Márquez Segura, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Miguel Flores, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Designing 'True Colors': A Social Wearable that Affords Vulnerability. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UK. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300263Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.Google Scholar
- Jared Duval, Elena Márquez Segura, Elizabeth Goldman, Su-Hua Wang, and Sri H Kurniawan. 2019. Using Connected Learning Design Principles to Further Co-Create a Critical Speech Therapy Game. In Proceedings of the 2019 Connected Learning Summit.Google Scholar
- Sarah Gallacher, Jenny O'Connor, Jon Bird, Yvonne Rogers, Licia Capra, Daniel Harrison, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Mood Squeezer: Lightening up the Workplace through Playful and Lightweight Interactions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 891--902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675170Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29.Google ScholarDigital Library
- William W. Gaver, John Bowers, Andrew Boucher, Hans Gellerson, Sarah Pennington, Albrecht Schmidt, Anthony Steed, Nicholas Villars, and Brendan Walker. 2004. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04). ACM, New York NY, USA, 885--900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.985947Google ScholarDigital Library
- Greg Guest, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2011. Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Stacy Holman Jones, Tony E. Adams, and Carolyn Ellis (Eds.). 2016. Handbook of autoethnography. Routledge.Google Scholar
- Andrés Lucero, Audrey Desjardins, Carman Neustaedter, Kristina Höök, Marc Hassenzahl, and Marta E. Cecchinato. 2019. A Sample of One: First-Person Research Methods in HCI. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (DIS '19 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 385--388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319996Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Asreen Rostami, and Annika Waern. 2016. Embodied sketching. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6014--6027.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elena Márquez Segura, Annika Waern, Luis Márquez Segura, and David López Recio. 2016. Playification: The PhySeEar case. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on ComputerHuman Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 376--388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968099Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sherif Mekky and Andrés Lucero. 2016. An Exploration of Designing for Playfulness in a Business Context. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3136--3143.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael J Muller. 2009. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In Humancomputer interaction. CRC press, 181--202.Google Scholar
- Eric Sanchez, Shawn Young, and Caroline Jouneau-Sion. 2017. Classcraft: from gamification to ludicization of classroom management. Education and Information Technologies 22, 2 (March 2017), 497--513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016--9489--6Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jaakko Stenros. 2015. Behind games: Playful mindsets and transformative practices. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Laia Turmo Vidal and Elena Márquez Segura. 2018. Documenting the Elusive and Ephemeral in Embodied Design Ideation Activities. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 3 (2018), 35.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Chasing Play with Instagram: How Can We Capture Mundane Play Potentials to Inspire Interaction Design?
Recommendations
Chasing Play Potentials in Food Culture: Learning from Traditions to Inspire Future Human-Food Interaction Design
DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceIn this pictorial, we turn to culture and traditions to present an annotated portfolio of play-food potentials, i.e. interesting design qualities and/or interaction mechanisms that could help promote playful and social engagement in food practices. Our ...
Designing for Play that Permeates Everyday Life: Towards New Methods for Situated Play Design
HTTF 2019: Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019In this paper we discuss strategies to support our design research agenda of promoting playful engagement within everyday activities and situations. We argue that this agenda is in alignment with the ethos of the third wave of HCI. To support design in ...
Chasing Play Potentials: Towards an Increasingly Situated and Emergent Approach to Everyday Play Design
DIS '19: Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems ConferenceUser involvement is well established in game and play design. But in a time when play design is becoming relevant in domains beyond pure entertainment, and play blends into everyday activity in diverse ways, we need to revisit old, and develop new, user ...
Comments