skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382913acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Chasing Play with Instagram: How Can We Capture Mundane Play Potentials to Inspire Interaction Design?

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Play and playfulness permeate our daily lives and are often the target of interaction designers. Yet, designing for play while embracing the idiosyncrasies of users and their contexts is challenging. Here we address recent calls for new situated and emergent play design methods by turning to social media, which is currently a source of inspiration for arts, crafts, fashion, and more. We present @chasing.play: An exploration of how Instagram may help designers capture and share instances of mundane playful engagement to inspire play design. We report on the findings of a pilot study where we experimented with the tool, and raise a challenges and open questions we plan to address in the future. Our work can trigger discussions among researchers about the potential of social media as a design tool and inspire action towards collectively defining strategies to leverage that potential.

References

  1. Chadia Abras, Diane Maloney-Krichmar, and Jenny Preece. 2004. User-centered design. Bainbridge, W. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 37(4), 445456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Elena Márquez Segura, Jared Duval, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Chasing Play Potentials: Towards an Increasingly Situated and Emergent Approach to Everyday Play Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1265--1277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322325Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Elena Márquez Segura, Jared Duval, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Designing for Play that Permeates Everyday Life: Towards New Methods for Situated Play Design. In Proceedings of the Halfway to the Future Symposium 2019 (HTTF 2019), Joel E Fischer, Sarah Martindale, Martin Porcheron, Stuart Reeves, and Jocelyn Spence (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 16, 4 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3363384.3363400Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Laurens Boer and Jared Donovan. 2012. Provotypes for participatory innovation. In Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, 388--397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Simon Clatworthy, Robin Oorschot, and Berit Lindquister. 2014. How to get a leader to talk: Tangible objects for strategic conversations in service design. In ServDes. 2014 Service Future; Proceedings of the fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference; Lancaster University; United Kingdom; 9--11 April 2014. Linköping University Electronic Press, 270--280.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrew Crabtree, Mark Rouncefield, and Peter Tolmie. 2012. Doing design ethnography. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ella Dagan, Elena Márquez Segura, Ferran Altarriba Bertran, Miguel Flores, and Katherine Isbister. 2019. Designing 'True Colors': A Social Wearable that Affords Vulnerability. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Proceedings May 4--9, 2019, Glasgow, Scotland UK. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 15 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Allison Druin. 2002. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behaviour and information technology 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jared Duval, Elena Márquez Segura, Elizabeth Goldman, Su-Hua Wang, and Sri H Kurniawan. 2019. Using Connected Learning Design Principles to Further Co-Create a Critical Speech Therapy Game. In Proceedings of the 2019 Connected Learning Summit.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Sarah Gallacher, Jenny O'Connor, Jon Bird, Yvonne Rogers, Licia Capra, Daniel Harrison, and Paul Marshall. 2015. Mood Squeezer: Lightening up the Workplace through Playful and Lightweight Interactions. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 891--902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675170Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Bill Gaver, Tony Dunne, and Elena Pacenti. 1999. Design: cultural probes. Interactions 6, 1 (1999), 21--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. William W. Gaver, John Bowers, Andrew Boucher, Hans Gellerson, Sarah Pennington, Albrecht Schmidt, Anthony Steed, Nicholas Villars, and Brendan Walker. 2004. The drift table: designing for ludic engagement. In CHI '04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '04). ACM, New York NY, USA, 885--900. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.985947Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Greg Guest, Kathleen M. MacQueen, and Emily E. Namey. 2011. Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Stacy Holman Jones, Tony E. Adams, and Carolyn Ellis (Eds.). 2016. Handbook of autoethnography. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Andrés Lucero, Audrey Desjardins, Carman Neustaedter, Kristina Höök, Marc Hassenzahl, and Marta E. Cecchinato. 2019. A Sample of One: First-Person Research Methods in HCI. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion (DIS '19 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 385--388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3319996Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Elena Márquez Segura, Laia Turmo Vidal, Asreen Rostami, and Annika Waern. 2016. Embodied sketching. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6014--6027.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Elena Márquez Segura, Annika Waern, Luis Márquez Segura, and David López Recio. 2016. Playification: The PhySeEar case. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on ComputerHuman Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 376--388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2967934.2968099Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sherif Mekky and Andrés Lucero. 2016. An Exploration of Designing for Playfulness in a Business Context. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3136--3143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Michael J Muller. 2009. Participatory design: the third space in HCI. In Humancomputer interaction. CRC press, 181--202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Eric Sanchez, Shawn Young, and Caroline Jouneau-Sion. 2017. Classcraft: from gamification to ludicization of classroom management. Education and Information Technologies 22, 2 (March 2017), 497--513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016--9489--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Jaakko Stenros. 2015. Behind games: Playful mindsets and transformative practices. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Laia Turmo Vidal and Elena Márquez Segura. 2018. Documenting the Elusive and Ephemeral in Embodied Design Ideation Activities. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2, 3 (2018), 35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Chasing Play with Instagram: How Can We Capture Mundane Play Potentials to Inspire Interaction Design?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      4474 pages
      ISBN:9781450368193
      DOI:10.1145/3334480

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format