skip to main content
10.1145/3334480.3382936acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Bardzell's "Feminist HCI" Legacy: Analyzing Citational Patterns

Published:25 April 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this late-breaking work, we describe the legacy of feminist theory within HCI literature, focusing on Shaowen Bardzell's seminal publication "Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design," which was one of the first to propose adoption of feminist theories into HCI research and practice. We conducted a citation analysis of 70 published texts that cited this paper, using the Harwood functions to identify how feminist theory concepts have been cited in HCI and whether the implementation of proposed frameworks has taken place. This paper was mostly given 'credit,' and most frequently 'signposted' to keep readers on track of the topical issues in HCI, with little evidence of explicit use or extension of proposed frameworks. These results demonstrate a largely one-dimensional impact, characterized by a lack of deep engagement in feminist theories. We identify opportunities to expand feminist approach to further improve research and practice in HCI.

References

  1. Donald R Baker. 1990. Citation analysis: A methodological review. Social work research & abstracts 26, 3 (Sept. 1990), 3--10. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/swra/26.3.3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2015. Humanistic HCI. Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics 8, 4 (Sept. 2015), 1--185. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2200/S00664ED1V01Y201508HCI031Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jeffrey Bardzell, Shaowen Bardzell, and Mark A Blythe. 2018. Critical Theory and Interaction Design. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1301--1310. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J Beck and L Chiapello. 2016. Schön's legacy: Examining contemporary citation practices in DRS publications. DRS2016: Future-Focused Thinking, Brighton, UK (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lutz Bornmann. 2008. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation 64, 1 (Jan. 2008), 45--80. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220410810844150Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Donald O Case and Georgeann M Higgins. 2000. How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 7 (2000), 635--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Audrey Desjardins, Cayla Key, Heidi R. Biggs, and Kelsey Aschenbeck. 2019. Bespoke Booklets: A Method for Situated Co-Speculation. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 697--709. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322311Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Catherine D'Ignazio, Alexis Hope, Becky Michelson, Robyn Churchill, and Ethan Zuckerman. 2016. A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2612--2622.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Daniel A. Epstein, Nicole B. Lee, Jennifer H. Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R. Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A. Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining Menstrual Tracking to Inform the Design of Personal Informatics Tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). ACM, NY, NY, USA, 6876--6888. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025635Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, and Amy S Bruckman. 2016. An archive of their own: A case study of feminist HCI and values in design. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2574--2585.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Steve Harrison, Phoebe Sengers, and Deborah Tatar. 2011. Making epistemological trouble: Third-paradigm HCI as successor science. Interact. Comput. 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 385--392. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.03.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nigel Harwood. 2009. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. J. Pragmat. 41, 3 (March 2009), 497--518. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Naveena Karusala and Neha Kumar. 2017. Women's Safety in Public Spaces: Examining the Efficacy of Panic Buttons in New Delhi. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3340--3351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Neha Kumar and Richard J Anderson. 2015. Mobile phones for maternal health in rural India. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 427--436.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jeppe Nicolaisen. 2007. Citation analysis. Ann. Rev. Info. Sci. Tech. 41, 1 (Oct. 2007), 609--641. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Johanna Okerlund, Madison Dunaway, Celine Latulipe, David Wilson, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Statement Making: A Maker Fashion Show Foregrounding Feminism, Gender, and Transdisciplinarity. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, 187--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yvonne Rogers. 2004. New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction. Annual review of information science and technology 38, 1 (2004), 87--143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Katie Shilton. 2018. Values and Ethics in Human-Computer Interaction. Foundations and Trends® Human--Computer Interaction 12, 2 (2018), 107--171. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/1100000073Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Aditya Vashistha, Abhinav Garg, Richard Anderson, and Agha Ali Raza. 2019. Threats, Abuses, Flirting, and Blackmail: Gender Inequity in Social Media Voice Forums. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article Paper 72, 13 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300302Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mihaela Vorvoreanu, Lingyi Zhang, Yun-Han Huang, Claudia Hilderbrand, Zoe Steine-Hanson, and Margaret Burnett. 2019. From Gender Biases to Gender-Inclusive Design: An Empirical Investigation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '19). ACM, NY, NY, USA, Article Paper 53, 14 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300283Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Lindsay Weinberg. 2017. Rethinking Privacy: A Feminist Approach to Privacy Rights after Snowden. Westminster Papers in Culture and Communication 12, 3 (Oct. 2017), 5--20. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.258Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Marisol Wong-Villacres, Arkadeep Kumar, Aditya Vishwanath, Naveena Karusala, Betsy DiSalvo, and Neha Kumar. 2018. Designing for intersections. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, 45--58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Guo Zhang, Ying Ding, and Staa Milojevic. 2013. Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 64, 7 (July 2013), 1490--1503. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22850Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Bardzell's "Feminist HCI" Legacy: Analyzing Citational Patterns

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '20: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2020
      4474 pages
      ISBN:9781450368193
      DOI:10.1145/3334480

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 April 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • abstract

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format